Paul Jubb and Giles Hussey will face off in the qualifications of the Ilkley Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.727
Giles Hussey -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Giles Hussey
There is no head to head record between Paul Jubb and Giles Hussey since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Paul Jubb
9 - 12win/loss
260
180
LWLWWLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11-14 | 2-4 | 6-6 | 0-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 254, Paul reached the qualifications after beating James Story 7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(4).
In the qualifications, The Brit defeated Story (7-64 3-6 7-64).During the match, Jubb scored less points (8) than Story. In fact, the world no. 254 won 108 points vs Story’s. That means that Jubb was more focused during the important points. Jubb was very aggressive to blast 57 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jubb recorded 4 aces and he was not very solid on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve 5 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 60% of his first serves in, winning 75% (57/76) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (20/51) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Story 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Jubb has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 67% of his matches (225-110). 1-0 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Jubb has an overall19-16 win-loss record in the last 9 years on grass.
Jubb’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Santa margherita di Pula.
Paul has an overall 9-12 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ilkley Challenger
Giles Hussey
25 - 10win/loss
376
304
LWLWLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-11 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-22 | 35-15 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 18-7 | 0-3 | 3-2 |
| 2022 | 30-25 | 16-11 | 0-1 | 12-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-15 | 23-10 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 434, Hussey reached the qualifications after defeating Omar Jasika 6-0 6-2.
In the qualifications, Giles had a good straight sets win against Jasika (6-0 6-2). During the match Hussey scored 56 points vs Jasika’s 32. Giles was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Hussey managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Giles Hussey conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Hussey put 63% of his first serves in, winning 67% (20/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Jasika 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Giles’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir.
Hussey has an overall 25-10 win-loss record in 2025, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jubb | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 14 |
| Pts | 108-116 | 56-32 |
| Total Points | 224 | 88 |
| Winners | 57 | 20 |
| %Winners | 53% | 36% |
Both Jubb and Hussey played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Paul Jubb lost 1 set while Giles Hussey hasn’t conceded a set so far. Jubb has played 1 set more than Hussey (3 vs 2). Therefore, Jubb played 21 games more than Hussey. Jubb scored 57 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit bagged 20 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jubb | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6 |
| 1st in | 76/127 | 30/48 |
| %1st in | 60% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 57/76 | 20/30 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 20/51 | 12/18 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 67% |
Jubb struck 4 aces . Hussey scored 6 aces . Jubb won 75% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Hussey won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jubb | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 43% | 56% |
| Conceded | 15 | 2 |
| Saved | 10 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
The Brit broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Paul lost his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Giles broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Giles was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Jubb | |||
| Q1 Story |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 3-6 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 108-116 | 108-116 | |
| Total points | 224 | 224 | |
| Winners | 57 | 57 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 76/127 | 76/127 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 57/76 | 57/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/51 | 20/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 10/15 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Hussey | |||
| Q1 Jasika |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 56-32 | 56-32 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 30/48 | 30/48 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 20/30 | 20/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 12/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWLWL
LWLWLWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fajing SunSun – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Chris RodeschRodesch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harry WendelkenWendelken – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
