Otto Virtanen and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will fight against each other in the quarter of the Birmingham Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:30 pm on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Otto Virtanen who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Otto Virtanen is the pick to win this match.
Otto Virtanen -> 1.38
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.85
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Otto Virtanen vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
There is no head to head record between Otto Virtanen and Chak Lam Coleman Wong since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Otto Virtanen
10 - 16win/loss
98
91
WWWWWWLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 14-16 | 2-6 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 6-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-28 | 9-11 | 5-7 | 24-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-31 | 4-6 | 4-10 | 22-11 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-31 | 4-1 | 7-12 | 25-13 | 8-3 | 2-2 |
| 2021 | 40-21 | 2-2 | 16-11 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
Ranked no. 114, Virtanen reached the quarter after defeating Aleksandar Vukic 7-6(4) 6-3 and Marc-Andrea Huesler 6-3 6-7(6) 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Finn defeated Huesler (6-3 6-76 6-1). During the match, Virtanen scored 103 points vs Huesler’s 78. Virtanen was quite aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Virtanen made 18 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Otto Virtanen was quite effective on serve to win 85% (46/54) of his 1st serve and 63% (24/38) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Otto broke Huesler 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Otto has dropped 1 set in this tournament to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Virtanen has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (215-152). 2-0 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Virtanen has an aggregate18-10 record in the last 9 years on grass.
The Finn has a composed 10-16 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Birmingham Challenger
Virtanen has never competed in this tournament before.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
13 - 14win/loss
172
128
WLWLLWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-17 | 6-8 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 175, the got to the quarter after beating Ryan Peniston 7-6(3) 6-4, Mark Lajal 6-4 7-5, Johannus Monday 6-1 5-7 6-3 and Zachary Svajda 4-6 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Svajda, Chak recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 94 points vs Svajda’s 76. Chak was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Lam Coleman Wong made 10 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (39/52) of his 1st serve and 62% (18/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The broke Svajda 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
The has an overall 13-14 win-loss record in 2025, 4-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Virtanen | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 51 | 100 |
| Pts | 178-138 | 326-267 |
| Total Points | 316 | 593 |
| Winners | 80 | 149 |
| %Winners | 45% | 46% |
Virtanen played 2 matches while Lam Coleman Wong competed in 4 matches. Lam Coleman Wong started his run from the qualifications while Virtanen had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Otto Virtanen surrendered 1 set, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost 2 sets. Virtanen has played 5 set(s) less than Lam Coleman Wong (5 vs 10). Therefore, Virtanen played 49 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. Otto scored 80 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The made 149 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Virtanen | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 33 | 31 |
| Avg per match | 16.5 | 7.8 |
| 1st in | 95/160 | 191/288 |
| %1st in | 59% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 80/95 | 149/191 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 42/65 | 62/97 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 64% |
Virtanen fired 33 aces (16.5 per match). Lam Coleman Wong struck 31 aces (7.8 per match). Virtanen won 84% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Virtanen | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/19 | 12/26 |
| % Converted | 21% | 46% |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 |
| Saved | 5 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Otto broke his opponents 4 times with a 21% conversion rate. The Finn pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 5 break points. Chak broke his opponents 12 times with a 46% conversion rate. Chak conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Virtanen | ||||
| R1 Vukic |
R2 Huesler |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-3 | 6-3 6-76 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 29 | 51 | |
| pts | 75-60 | 103-78 | 178-138 | |
| Total points | 135 | 181 | 316 | |
| Winners | 34 | 46 | 80 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 15 | 18 | 33 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 41/68 | 54/92 | 95/160 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 34/41 | 46/54 | 80/95 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 85% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/27 | 24/38 | 42/65 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 63% | 65% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Converted | 1/6 | 3/13 | 4/19 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 23% | 21% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 4/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||||
| Q1 Peniston |
Q3 Lajal |
R1 Monday |
R2 Svajda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-4 | 6-4 7-5 | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 22 | 28 | 27 | 100 | |
| pts | 75-61 | 69-61 | 88-69 | 94-76 | 326-267 | |
| Total points | 136 | 130 | 157 | 170 | 593 | |
| Winners | 41 | 34 | 35 | 39 | 149 | |
| %Winners | 55% | 49% | 40% | 41% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 31 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 54/71 | 41/59 | 44/77 | 52/81 | 191/288 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 69% | 57% | 64% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 41/54 | 34/41 | 35/44 | 39/52 | 149/191 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 83% | 80% | 75% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/18 | 22/33 | 18/29 | 62/97 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 61% | 67% | 62% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/5 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 12/26 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 40% | 80% | 40% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/1 | 1/2 | 3/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 50% | 60% | 139% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWLWLL
WLWLLWWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Brandon HoltHolt – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Alex BoltBolt (1-0) – H2H and prediction
