Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Zachary Svajda will square off in the 2nd round of the Birmingham Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zachary Svajda who should win in 3 sets.
Zachary Svajda -> 1.66
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Zachary Svajda
This will be the 3rd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Zachary Svajda face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Svajda (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on grass.
The last time that they played each other, Svajda won 6-4 6-4 in the qualifications in at the Wimbledon back in 2024.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
12 - 14win/loss
143
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-30 | 20-18 | 2-6 | 4-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 175, Chak reached the 2nd round after beating Ryan Peniston 7-6(3) 6-4, Mark Lajal 6-4 7-5 and Johannus Monday 6-1 5-7 6-3.
In the 1st round, Chak defeated Monday (6-1 5-7 6-3). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 88 points vs Monday’s 69. Lam Coleman Wong was exceptionally aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong fired 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was very efficient on serve to win 80% (35/44) of his 1st serve and 67% (22/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Lam Coleman Wong broke Monday 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (144-114). 3-0 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled3-4 record in the last 7 years on grass.
Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled 12-14 win-loss record in 2025, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Birmingham Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
Zachary Svajda
10 - 14win/loss
141
102
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-21 | 18-15 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 14-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-35 | 27-21 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-24 | 28-8 | 2-6 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-23 | 25-14 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-13 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 228, the American reached the 2nd round after beating Aidan Mchugh 6-1 6-1, Li Tu 4-6 6-4 7-5 and Kamil Majchrzak 6-4 7-6(3).
In the 1st round, Zachary had a good straight sets win against Majchrzak (6-4 7-63). During the match Svajda scored 84 points vs Majchrzak’s 71. Svajda was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Svajda blasted 4 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Zachary Svajda lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Svajda put 61% of his first serves in, winning 67% (29/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (20/28) on the 2nd serve. Svajda broke Majchrzak twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Zachary has an aggregate 10-14 win-loss record in 2025, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 73 | 69 |
| Pts | 232-191 | 240-203 |
| Total Points | 423 | 443 |
| Winners | 110 | 106 |
| %Winners | 47% | 44% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Svajda played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost 1 set, while Zachary Svajda surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Svajda have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 4 games more than Svajda. The scored 110 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 106 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 21 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 139/207 | 145/224 |
| %1st in | 67% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 110/139 | 106/145 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 44/68 | 43/79 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 54% |
Lam Coleman Wong blasted 21 aces (7 per match). Svajda struck 13 aces (4.3 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Svajda won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 10 |
| Converted | 8/16 | 10/23 |
| % Converted | 50% | 43% |
| Conceded | 6 | 14 |
| Saved | 4 | 11 |
| % Saved | 67% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The broke his opponents 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. The surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Zachary broke his opponents 10 times with a 43% conversion rate. Zachary conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||||
| Q1 Peniston | Q3 Lajal | R1 Monday | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-4 | 6-4 7-5 | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 22 | 28 | 73 | |
| pts | 75-61 | 69-61 | 88-69 | 232-191 | |
| Total points | 136 | 130 | 157 | 423 | |
| Winners | 41 | 34 | 35 | 110 | |
| %Winners | 55% | 49% | 40% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 9 | 9 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 54/71 | 41/59 | 44/77 | 139/207 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 69% | 57% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 41/54 | 34/41 | 35/44 | 110/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 83% | 80% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/18 | 22/33 | 44/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 61% | 67% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/5 | 4/5 | 8/16 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 40% | 80% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/1 | 1/2 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 50% | 72% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Svajda | |||||
| Q1 Mchugh | Q3 Tu | R1 Majchrzak | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 32 | 23 | 69 | |
| pts | 56-32 | 100-100 | 84-71 | 240-203 | |
| Total points | 88 | 200 | 155 | 443 | |
| Winners | 22 | 55 | 29 | 106 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 55% | 35% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 28/40 | 74/113 | 43/71 | 145/224 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 65% | 61% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 55/74 | 29/43 | 106/145 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 74% | 67% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/12 | 16/39 | 20/28 | 43/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 41% | 71% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 3/5 | 2/9 | 10/23 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 60% | 22% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 11 | 3 | 14 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 9/11 | 2/3 | 11 | |
| Saved % | – | 82% | 67% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Birmingham Challenger
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Brandon HoltHolt – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Nicolas JarryJarry (7-66 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex BoltBolt – Li TuTu (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Alex BoltBolt (1-0) – H2H and prediction