
Dimitar Kuzmanov and Norbert Gombos will square off in the 2nd round of the Prostejov Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on PROSTEJOV ARENA. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Norbert Gombos who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Norbert Gombos is the pick to win this match.
Norbert Gombos -> 1.63
Dimitar Kuzmanov -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Dimitar Kuzmanov vs. Norbert Gombos
There is no head to head record between Dimitar Kuzmanov and Norbert Gombos since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Dimitar Kuzmanov


22 - 12win/loss
253
158

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 29-15 | 10-3 | 17-9 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 24-24 | 12-7 | 9-13 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-25 | 9-7 | 22-15 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 32-26 | 10-7 | 16-13 | 4-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 32-25 | 8-6 | 22-15 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 277, Dimitar reached the 2nd round after beating Albert Ramos-Vinolas 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Dimitar had a good straight sets win against Ramos-Vinolas (6-3 6-2). During the match, Kuzmanov scored 59 points vs Ramos-Vinolas’s 38. Kuzmanov was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kuzmanov was unable to score even 1 ace and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Dimitar Kuzmanov was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (29/37) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Bulgarian broke Ramos-Vinolas 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Kuzmanov has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (355-212). 10-6 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Kuzmanov has an overall 225-130 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Hersonissos 2 Challenger where he defeated Federico Cina in the final 6-4 6-2.
The Bulgarian has an overall 22-12 win-loss record in 2025, 10-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prostejov Challenger
Norbert Gombos


23 - 12win/loss
328
80

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 25-15 | 1-2 | 18-9 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 23-23 | 13-3 | 10-13 | 0-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 18-23 | 2-4 | 11-10 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-28 | 7-3 | 28-17 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 26-30 | 0-9 | 13-10 | 12-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 332, the Slovakian reached the 2nd round after defeating Dominik Kellovsky 6-4 6-4, Toby Alex Kodat 7-5 6-3 and Dalibor Svrcina 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Gombos had a good straight sets win against Svrcina (6-3 6-4). During the match Gombos scored 71 points vs Svrcina’s 61. The Slovakian was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Gombos blasted 6 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Norbert Gombos lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Gombos put 64% of his first serves in, winning 69% (33/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (10/27) on the 2nd serve. The Slovakian broke Svrcina 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
The Slovakian’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Madrid Challenger.
Gombos has a compiled 23-12 win-loss record in 2025, 16-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prostejov Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2014. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kuzmanov | Gombos |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
Tot Games | 17 | 60 |
Pts | 59-38 | 218-173 |
Total Points | 97 | 391 |
Winners | 29 | 94 |
%Winners | 49% | 43% |
Kuzmanov played 1 match while Gombos competed in 3 matches. Gombos started his run from the qualifications while Kuzmanov had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Kuzmanov has played 4 set(s) less than Gombos (2 vs 6). Therefore, Kuzmanov played 43 games less than Gombos. Dimitar scored 29 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Norbert scored 94 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kuzmanov | Gombos |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 24 |
Avg per match | 0 | 8 |
1st in | 37/54 | 127/195 |
%1st in | 69% | 65% |
1st pts | 29/37 | 94/127 |
%1st pts | 78% | 74% |
2nd pts | 9/17 | 33/68 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 49% |
Kuzmanov didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Gombos struck 24 aces (8 per match). Kuzmanov won 78% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Gombos won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kuzmanov | Gombos |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 12 |
Converted | 4/5 | 12/23 |
% Converted | 80% | 52% |
Conceded | 4 | 18 |
Saved | 3 | 12 |
% Saved | 75% | 67% |
Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
Dimitar broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Bulgarian surrendered his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Norbert broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Norbert conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Kuzmanov | |||
R1 Ramos-Vinolas |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 59-38 | 59-38 | |
Total points | 97 | 97 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 49% | 49% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 37/54 | 37/54 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 29/37 | 29/37 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Gombos | |||||
Q1 Kellovsky |
Q3 Alex |
R1 Svrcina |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 21 | 19 | 60 | |
pts | 67-53 | 80-59 | 71-61 | 218-173 | |
Total points | 120 | 139 | 132 | 391 | |
Winners | 30 | 31 | 33 | 94 | |
%Winners | 45% | 39% | 46% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 10 | 8 | 6 | 24 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
1st in | 35/49 | 44/71 | 48/75 | 127/195 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 62% | 64% | 65% | |
1st pts | 30/35 | 31/44 | 33/48 | 94/127 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 70% | 69% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 10/14 | 13/27 | 10/27 | 33/68 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 48% | 37% | 49% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 5 | 5 | 12 | |
Converted | 2/7 | 5/10 | 5/6 | 12/23 | |
Converted % | 29% | 50% | 83% | 52% | |
Conceded | 0 | 9 | 9 | 18 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 6/9 | 6/9 | 12 | |
Saved % | – | 67% | 67% | 134% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Prostejov Challenger
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (7-5 6-74 6-4) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Hynek BartonBarton (5-7 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Petr BrunclikBrunclik (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo (7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (6-0 4-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Vit KoprivaKopriva (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxim MrvaMrva – Lukas PokornyPokorny (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Milos KarolKarol – Jozef KovalikKovalik (6-2 5-7 7-60) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Jakub MensikMensik (6-4 1-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Matteo MartineauMartineau (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Milos KarolKarol – Jozef KovalikKovalik (6-2 5-7 7-6(0)) – See score progression
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Petr BrunclikBrunclik (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
- Maxim MrvaMrva – Lukas PokornyPokorny (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo (7-6(2) 6-1) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Vit KoprivaKopriva (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (7-6(6) 6-1) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (7-5 6-7(4) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (1-0) – H2H and prediction