Yibing Wu and Maxime Cressy will square off in the qualifications of the Tyler Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on STADIUM 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yibing Wu who should win in 2 sets.
Yibing Wu -> 1.175
Maxime Cressy -> 4.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Yibing Wu vs. Maxime Cressy
There is no head to head record between Yibing Wu and Maxime Cressy since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Yibing Wu
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 9-3 | 7-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 9-5 | 7-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 18-17 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 9-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-7 | 20-5 | 10-2 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 401, Yibing reached the qualifications after defeating Keisuke Saitoh 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Yibing had a good straight sets win against Saitoh (6-1 6-3). During the match, Wu scored 60 points vs Saitoh’s 38. Wu was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Wu scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Yibing Wu was extremely efficient on serve to win 78% (21/27) of his 1st serve and 75% (12/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Yibing broke Saitoh 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Wu has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 62% of his matches (123-74). 1-1 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Wu has an aggregate70-48 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Yibing has an overall 3-3 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tyler Challenger
Yibing has never competed in this tournament before.
Maxime Cressy
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 3-8 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 29-26 | 17-15 | 0-1 | 6-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 19-31 | 3-10 | 0-5 | 15-10 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
2022 | 34-30 | 15-11 | 5-7 | 3-8 | 11-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 43-32 | 14-10 | 2-8 | 16-8 | 4-4 | 7-2 |
Ranked no. 439, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Alex Martinez 4-6 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications against Martinez, Cressy recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-4).During the match Cressy scored less points (5) than Martinez. In fact, the world no. 401 won 90 points vs Martinez’s. That means that Cressy was more focused during the important points. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Cressy recorded 6 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Maxime Cressy lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Cressy put 66% of his first serves in, winning 79% (48/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. Maxime broke Martinez 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
The American has a compiled 3-7 win-loss record in 2025, 2-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Wu | Cressy |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 16 | 32 |
Pts | 60-38 | 90-95 |
Total Points | 98 | 185 |
Winners | 21 | 48 |
%Winners | 35% | 53% |
Both Wu and Cressy played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Maxime Cressy surrendered 1 set while Yibing Wu hasn’t conceded a set so far. Wu has played 1 set(s) less than Cressy (2 vs 3). Therefore, Wu played 16 games less than Cressy. Yibing scored 21 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Cressy recorded 48 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Wu | Cressy |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 6 |
Avg per match | 1 | 6 |
1st in | 27/43 | 61/92 |
%1st in | 63% | 66% |
1st pts | 21/27 | 48/61 |
%1st pts | 78% | 79% |
2nd pts | 12/16 | 13/31 |
%2nd pts | 75% | 42% |
Wu bagged 1 ace . Cressy also bagged 6 aces . Wu won 78% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Cressy won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Wu | Cressy |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/5 | 3/13 |
% Converted | 80% | 23% |
Conceded | 0 | 3 |
Saved | 0 | 1 |
% Saved | 0% | 33% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Wu broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Chinese was rock solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Maxime broke his opponent 3 times with a 23% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
Wu | |||
Q1 Saitoh | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 60-38 | 60-38 | |
Total points | 98 | 98 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 27/43 | 27/43 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 21/27 | 21/27 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 12/16 | 12/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Cressy | |||
Q1 Martinez | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
pts | 90-95 | 90-95 | |
Total points | 185 | 185 | |
Winners | 48 | 48 | |
%Winners | 53% | 53% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 61/92 | 61/92 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 48/61 | 48/61 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 13/31 | 13/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/13 | 3/13 | |
Converted % | 23% | 23% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Hyeon ChungChung – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Alvin Nicholas TudoricaNicholas Tudorica (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – Isaiah StrodeStrode (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-1) – H2H and prediction