Braden Shick and Trey Hilderbrand will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Tyler Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Trey Hilderbrand who should win in 3 sets.
Trey Hilderbrand -> 1.85
Braden Shick -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Braden Shick vs. Trey Hilderbrand
There is no head to head record between Braden Shick and Trey Hilderbrand since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Braden Shick
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-14 | 16-11 | 4-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 7-7 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-7 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Braden got to the qualifications after beating Hiroki Moriya 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
In the qualifications against Moriya, Shick recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-65 6-4). During the match, Shick and Moriya scored the same amount of points (123). However, the world no. was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Braden was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Shick fired 12 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Overall, Braden Shick was exceptionally effective on serve to win 74% (40/54) of his 1st serve and 52% (31/60) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. The American broke Moriya 3 times after converting 17% of his break points (3/18).
Shick has a winning win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 58% of his matches (26-19). 1-0 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Shick has an overall18-14 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
The American has an aggregate 4-2 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tyler Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Trey Hilderbrand
10 - 6win/loss
740
620
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-14 | 7-9 | 2-1 | 5-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-20 | 15-10 | 9-8 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-13 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-9 | 9-5 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 652, Hilderbrand got to the qualifications after defeating Nicolas Kicker 6-4 1-0 ret..
In the qualifications against Kicker, Hilderbrand had a free pass after Kicker retired on a 6-4 1-0 . scoreline.
Hilderbrand has a compiled 9-6 win-loss record in 2025, 2-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Shick | Hilderbrand |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 11 |
| Pts | 123-123 | 35-30 |
| Total Points | 246 | 65 |
| Winners | 40 | 19 |
| %Winners | 33% | 54% |
Both Shick and Hilderbrand played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Braden Shick conceded 1 set while Trey Hilderbrand hasn’t dropped a set so far. Talking about their workload, Shick and Hilderbrand have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Shick played 22 games more than Hilderbrand. Braden scored 40 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Trey bagged 19 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Shick | Hilderbrand |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 4 |
| 1st in | 54/114 | 24/35 |
| %1st in | 47% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 40/54 | 19/24 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 31/60 | 5/11 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 45% |
Shick managed to score 12 aces . Hilderbrand managed to score 4 aces . Shick won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Hilderbrand won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Shick | Hilderbrand |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/18 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 17% | 50% |
| Conceded | 14 | 3 |
| Saved | 11 | 3 |
| % Saved | 79% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 17% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Trey was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Shick | |||
| Q1 Moriya | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 123-123 | 123-123 | |
| Total points | 246 | 246 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 54/114 | 54/114 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 40/54 | 40/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 31/60 | 31/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/18 | 3/18 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 11/14 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 79% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Hilderbrand | |||
| Q1 Kicker | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 11 | 11 | |
| pts | 35-30 | 35-30 | |
| Total points | 65 | 65 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/35 | 24/35 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 19/24 | 19/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Hyeon ChungChung – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Alvin Nicholas TudoricaNicholas Tudorica (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – Isaiah StrodeStrode (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-1) – H2H and prediction