Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Mark Lajal will face off in the qualifications of the Birmingham Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mark Lajal who should win in 3 sets.
Mark Lajal -> 1.56
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Mark Lajal
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Mark Lajal since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
11 - 14win/loss
143
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-30 | 20-18 | 2-6 | 4-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 175, Lam Coleman Wong reached the qualifications after defeating Ryan Peniston 7-6(3) 6-4.
In the qualifications, Chak had a good straight sets win against Peniston (7-63 6-4). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 75 points vs Peniston’s 61. Lam Coleman Wong was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong fired 3 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was pretty efficient on serve to win 76% (41/54) of his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Chak broke Peniston twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 55% of his matches (142-114). 1-0 on grass in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled1-4 record in the last 7 years on grass.
Chak has a compiled 10-14 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Birmingham Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
Mark Lajal
18 - 10win/loss
146
145
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-25 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 15-8 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-30 | 18-14 | 0-3 | 15-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 25-16 | 5-2 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 35-12 | 2-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 199, the Estonian reached the qualifications after defeating Henry Searle 5-7 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications against Searle, Lajal recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-5 6-3). During the match Lajal scored 115 points vs Searle’s 101. Lajal was very aggressive to blast 51 winners.
About the serving games, Lajal blasted 6 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Mark Lajal was pretty effective on serve to win 84% (51/61) of his 1st serve and 55% (22/40) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Mark broke Searle twice after converting 15% of his break points (2/13).
Lajal’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Oeiras 3 Challenger and the Francavilla Challenger.
The Estonian has an aggregate 18-9 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 33 |
| Pts | 75-61 | 115-101 |
| Total Points | 136 | 216 |
| Winners | 41 | 51 |
| %Winners | 55% | 44% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Lajal played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Mark Lajal conceded 1 set while Chak Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set(s) less than Lajal (2 vs 3). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 10 games less than Lajal. The scored 41 winners (55% of the total points). On the other side, Mark struck 51 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 6 |
| 1st in | 54/71 | 61/101 |
| %1st in | 76% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 41/54 | 51/61 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 22/40 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 55% |
Lam Coleman Wong bagged 3 aces . Lajal managed to score 6 aces . Lam Coleman Wong won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Lajal won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 2 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/13 |
| % Converted | 33% | 15% |
| Conceded | 3 | 10 |
| Saved | 2 | 9 |
| % Saved | 67% | 90% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Chak lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Lajal broke his opponent twice with a 15% conversion rate. The Estonian conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| Q1 Peniston | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 75-61 | 75-61 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 55% | 55% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 54/71 | 54/71 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 41/54 | 41/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 11/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Lajal | |||
| Q1 Searle | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 115-101 | 115-101 | |
| Total points | 216 | 216 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 61/101 | 61/101 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 51/61 | 51/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/40 | 22/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/13 | 2/13 | |
| Converted % | 15% | 15% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Harold MayotMayot (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Billy HarrisHarris (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-0) – H2H and prediction