Ilia Simakin and Giles Hussey will square off in the semifinal of the Chisinau Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 2:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ilia Simakin who should win in 3 sets.
Ilia Simakin -> 1.55
Giles Hussey -> 2.33
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ilia Simakin vs. Giles Hussey
There is no head to head record between Ilia Simakin and Giles Hussey since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Ilia Simakin
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 33-13 | 33-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 62-22 | 55-21 | 0-0 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-19 | 28-18 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-17 | 24-12 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 249, the Russian got to the semifinal after beating Charlie Robertson 7-5 7-6(6), Philip Henning 6-4 6-1 and Petr Bar Biryukov 6-3 4-6 6-2.
In the quarter, The Russian defeated Bar Biryukov (6-3 4-6 6-2). During the match, Simakin scored 84 points vs Bar Biryukov’s 68. Ilia was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Simakin struck 2 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Ilia Simakin was quite efficient on serve to win 79% (33/42) of his 1st serve and 85% (17/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Simakin broke Bar Biryukov 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Russian has lost 1 set in this competition to win 55% of the points he played.
Simakin has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 68% of his matches (148-70). 30-10 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Simakin has a composed137-61 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Simakin’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M15 Heraklion and the Wuxi Challenger.
Simakin has an aggregate 30-10 win-loss record in 2025, 30-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chisinau Challenger
Simakin has never competed in this tournament before.
Giles Hussey
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 27-14 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2024 | 37-22 | 35-15 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-23 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 18-7 | 0-3 | 3-2 |
2022 | 30-25 | 16-11 | 0-1 | 12-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 30-15 | 23-10 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 434, the Brit reached the semifinal after beating Andrei Gorban 6-1 6-1, Ben Jones 6-4 7-6(2), Robin Bertrand 7-5 6-1, Masamichi Imamura 7-5 6-3 and Kaichi Uchida 6-4 7-6(4).
In the quarter, Giles had a good straight sets win against Uchida (6-4 7-64). During the match Hussey scored 78 points vs Uchida’s 65. Hussey was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Hussey fired 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Giles Hussey was extremely efficient on serve to win 78% (38/49) of his 1st serve and 71% (15/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Hussey broke Uchida once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Giles started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to conquer 57% of the points he played.
The Brit’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir.
Hussey has a compiled 23-8 win-loss record in 2025, 19-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Simakin | Hussey |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 5 |
Tot Set | 7 | 10 |
Tot Games | 69 | 100 |
Pts | 248-202 | 352-271 |
Total Points | 450 | 623 |
Winners | 98 | 148 |
%Winners | 40% | 42% |
Simakin played 3 matches while Hussey competed in 5 matches. Hussey started his run from the qualifications while Simakin had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Ilia Simakin lost 1 set while Giles Hussey hasn’t lost a set so far. Simakin has played 3 set(s) less than Hussey (7 vs 10). Therefore, Simakin played 31 games less than Hussey. Ilia scored 98 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Hussey struck 148 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Simakin | Hussey |
---|---|---|
Aces | 15 | 22 |
Avg per match | 5 | 4.4 |
1st in | 137/210 | 203/301 |
%1st in | 65% | 67% |
1st pts | 98/137 | 148/203 |
%1st pts | 72% | 73% |
2nd pts | 44/73 | 59/98 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 60% |
Simakin scored 15 aces (5 per match). Hussey scored 22 aces (4.4 per match). Simakin won 72% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Hussey won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Simakin | Hussey |
---|---|---|
Won | 12 | 19 |
Converted | 12/30 | 19/39 |
% Converted | 40% | 49% |
Conceded | 14 | 12 |
Saved | 9 | 7 |
% Saved | 64% | 58% |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
The Russian broke his opponents 12 times with a 40% conversion rate. Simakin dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 19 times with a 49% conversion rate. Hussey conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
Simakin | |||||
R1 Robertson | R2 Henning | 1/4 Bar | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 7-66 | 6-4 6-1 | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 17 | 27 | 69 | |
pts | 97-84 | 67-50 | 84-68 | 248-202 | |
Total points | 181 | 117 | 152 | 450 | |
Winners | 35 | 30 | 33 | 98 | |
%Winners | 36% | 45% | 39% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 5 | 8 | 2 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | |
1st in | 55/81 | 40/67 | 42/62 | 137/210 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 60% | 68% | 65% | |
1st pts | 35/55 | 30/40 | 33/42 | 98/137 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 75% | 79% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 15/26 | 12/27 | 17/20 | 44/73 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 44% | 85% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
Converted | 4/12 | 4/5 | 4/13 | 12/30 | |
Converted % | 33% | 80% | 31% | 40% | |
Conceded | 6 | 7 | 1 | 14 | |
Saved | 3/6 | 6/7 | 0/1 | 9 | |
Saved % | 50% | 86% | 0% | 45% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Hussey | |||||||
Q1 Gorban | Q3 Jones | R1 Bertrand | R2 Imamura | 1/4 Uchida | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-1 | 6-4 7-62 | 7-5 6-1 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 23 | 19 | 21 | 23 | 100 | |
pts | 56-32 | 82-68 | 65-42 | 71-64 | 78-65 | 352-271 | |
Total points | 88 | 150 | 107 | 135 | 143 | 623 | |
Winners | 24 | 34 | 29 | 23 | 38 | 148 | |
%Winners | 43% | 41% | 45% | 32% | 49% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 22 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |
1st in | 32/47 | 46/72 | 37/45 | 39/67 | 49/70 | 203/301 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 64% | 82% | 58% | 70% | 67% | |
1st pts | 24/32 | 34/46 | 29/37 | 23/39 | 38/49 | 148/203 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 74% | 78% | 59% | 78% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 6/15 | 18/26 | 3/8 | 17/28 | 15/21 | 59/98 | |
% 2nd pts | 40% | 69% | 38% | 61% | 71% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 6 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 19 | |
Converted | 6/8 | 1/4 | 6/11 | 5/12 | 1/4 | 19/39 | |
Converted % | 75% | 25% | 55% | 42% | 25% | 49% | |
Conceded | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 12 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 1/1 | 2/4 | 1/3 | 1/1 | 7 | |
Saved % | 67% | 100% | 50% | 33% | 100% | 117% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Tennis Scores in Chisinau Challenger
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Toby SamuelSamuel – Stuart ParkerParker (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Giles HusseyHussey – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Siddhant Banthia/Ramkumar RamanathanBanthia/Ramkumar Ramanathan – Petr Bar Biryukov/Saba PurtseladzeBar Biryukov/Saba Purtseladze (w/o) – See score progression
- Szymon Kielan/Filip PieczonkaKielan/Filip Pieczonka – Philip Henning/Courtney John LockHenning/Courtney John Lock (6-3 4-6 10-4) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Giles HusseyHussey – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Toby SamuelSamuel – Stuart ParkerParker (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (6-4 6-0) – See score progression