Stuart Parker and Toby Samuel will fight against each other in the quarter of the Chisinau Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:30 pm on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Toby Samuel who should win in 3 sets.
Toby Samuel -> 1.82
Stuart Parker -> 1.909
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Stuart Parker vs. Toby Samuel
There is no head to head record between Stuart Parker and Toby Samuel since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Stuart Parker
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-24 | 26-14 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-21 | 29-13 | 0-2 | 10-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-21 | 18-12 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 7-5 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 44-16 | 40-12 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 469, the Brit reached the quarter after defeating Naoki Tajima 6-1 1-0 ret., Filip Pieczonka 6-4 6-2
, Ilya Snitari 6-2 6-1 and Lorenzo Giustino 6-4 6-2.In the 2nd round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Giustino (6-4 6-2). During the match, Parker scored 61 points vs Giustino’s 43. Stuart was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Parker managed to score 10 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults. Stuart Parker was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 83% (24/29) of his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Giustino 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Stuart started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
Parker has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 64% of his matches (221-124). 20-7 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Parker has a compiled158-70 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Stuart’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Hersonissos 1 Challenger and M15 Heraklion.
Stuart has an aggregate 24-11 win-loss record in 2025, 20-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chisinau Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Toby Samuel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 48-16 | 40-11 | 3-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-14 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 8-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-5 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 5-1 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 888, Samuel reached the quarter after defeating Lilian Marmousez 7-5 6-2 and Radu Albot 6-4 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Samuel had a good straight sets win against Albot (6-4 6-3). During the match Samuel scored 67 points vs Albot’s 51. Samuel was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Samuel struck 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Toby Samuel was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (31/42) of his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Samuel broke Albot 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Toby hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
Toby has an aggregate 13-10 win-loss record in 2025, 8-6 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Parker | Samuel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 59 | 39 |
| Pts | 214-138 | 137-94 |
| Total Points | 352 | 231 |
| Winners | 88 | 64 |
| %Winners | 41% | 47% |
Parker played 4 matches while Samuel competed in 2 matches. Parker started his run from the qualifications while Samuel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Parker has played 5 sets more than Samuel (9 vs 4). Therefore, Parker played 20 games more than Samuel. The Brit scored 88 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Samuel blasted 64 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Parker | Samuel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 21 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 5.3 | 9 |
| 1st in | 103/164 | 80/111 |
| %1st in | 63% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 88/103 | 64/80 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 37/61 | 17/31 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 55% |
Parker fired 21 aces (5.3 per match). Samuel fired 18 aces (9 per match). Parker won 85% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Samuel won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Parker | Samuel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 7 |
| Converted | 14/27 | 7/12 |
| % Converted | 52% | 58% |
| Conceded | 1 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Parker broke his opponents 14 times with a 52% conversion rate. Stuart was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Brit broke his opponents 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Samuel conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Parker | ||||||
| Q1 Tajima | Q3 Pieczonka | R1 Snitari | R2 Giustino | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 1-0 ret. | 6-4 6-2 | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 8 | 18 | 15 | 18 | 59 | |
| pts | 32-13 | 63-49 | 58-33 | 61-43 | 214-138 | |
| Total points | 45 | 112 | 91 | 104 | 352 | |
| Winners | 14 | 29 | 21 | 24 | 88 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 46% | 36% | 39% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 16/21 | 34/59 | 24/37 | 29/47 | 103/164 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 58% | 65% | 62% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 14/16 | 29/34 | 21/24 | 24/29 | 88/103 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 85% | 88% | 83% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 3/5 | 13/25 | 8/13 | 13/18 | 37/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 52% | 62% | 72% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 14 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/5 | 5/9 | 3/7 | 14/27 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 60% | 56% | 43% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | – | – | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Samuel | ||||||
| R1 Marmousez | R2 Albot | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | 6-4 6-3 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 | 39 | |||
| pts | 70-43 | 67-51 | 137-94 | |||
| Total points | 113 | 118 | 231 | |||
| Winners | 33 | 31 | 64 | |||
| %Winners | 47% | 46% | 47% | |||
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 12 | 6 | 18 | |||
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||
| 1st in | 38/47 | 42/64 | 80/111 | |||
| % 1st in | 81% | 66% | 72% | |||
| 1st pts | 33/38 | 31/42 | 64/80 | |||
| % 1st pts | 87% | 74% | 80% | |||
| 2nd pts | 5/9 | 12/22 | 17/31 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 55% | 55% | |||
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |||
| Converted | 4/8 | 3/4 | 7/12 | |||
| Converted % | 50% | 75% | 58% | |||
| Conceded | 1 | 5 | 6 | |||
| Saved | 0/1 | 4/5 | 4 | |||
| Saved % | 0% | 80% | 20% | |||
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
Tennis Scores in Chisinau Challenger
- Siddhant Banthia/Ramkumar RamanathanBanthia/Ramkumar Ramanathan – Petr Bar Biryukov/Saba PurtseladzeBar Biryukov/Saba Purtseladze (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Szymon Kielan/Filip PieczonkaKielan/Filip Pieczonka – Philip Henning/Courtney John LockHenning/Courtney John Lock (6-3 4-6 10-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (2-0) – H2H and prediction