Kenta Miyoshi and Daniel Milavsky will face off in the 2nd round of the Little Rock Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 13. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kenta Miyoshi who should win in 3 sets.
Kenta Miyoshi -> 1.53
Daniel Milavsky -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kenta Miyoshi vs. Daniel Milavsky
There is no head to head record between Kenta Miyoshi and Daniel Milavsky since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Kenta Miyoshi
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 11-6 | 10-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 24-12 | 12-6 | 2-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 10-11 | 7-9 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 9-5 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 656, Miyoshi got to the 2nd round after defeating Hiroki Moriya 6-1 6-1, Hyeon Chung 7-5 7-6(5) and Santiago Rodriguez Taverna 7-5 5-1 ret..
In the 1st round against Rodriguez Taverna, Miyoshi had a free pass after Rodriguez Taverna retired on a 7-5 5-1 . scoreline.
Miyoshi has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 62% of his matches (47-29). 3-0 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Miyoshi has an overall30-19 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
Miyoshi has a compiled 4-1 win-loss record in 2025, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
The Japanese has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Milavsky
14 - 4win/loss
568
568
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 22-9 | 16-5 | 1-1 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2024 | 12-3 | 3-2 | 2-1 | 7-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 8-4 | 7-4 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 679, Daniel got to the 2nd round after beating Alex Rybakov 1-6 6-3 6-2, Yusuke Takahashi 6-4 1-2 ret. and Moerani Bouzige 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Milavsky had a good straight sets win against Bouzige (6-4 6-4). During the match Milavsky scored 68 points vs Bouzige’s 57. Milavsky was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Milavsky blasted 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Daniel Milavsky conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Milavsky put 59% of his first serves in, winning 84% (31/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (13/26) on the 2nd serve. Milavsky broke Bouzige twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Milavsky’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Kingston and M15 Sherbrooke.
The American has an aggregate 14-3 win-loss record in 2025, 8-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Miyoshi | Milavsky |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 3 |
Tot Set | 7 | 8 |
Tot Games | 57 | 57 |
Pts | 224-174 | 181-156 |
Total Points | 398 | 337 |
Winners | 96 | 85 |
%Winners | 43% | 47% |
Both Miyoshi and Milavsky played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Milavsky lost 2 sets while Kenta Miyoshi hasn’t lost a set so far. Miyoshi has played 1 set(s) less than Milavsky (7 vs 8). However, it is interesting to notice that they played the same amount of games (57). Kenta scored 96 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Milavsky recorded 85 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Miyoshi | Milavsky |
---|---|---|
Aces | 18 | 16 |
Avg per match | 6 | 5.3 |
1st in | 124/195 | 110/170 |
%1st in | 64% | 65% |
1st pts | 96/124 | 85/110 |
%1st pts | 77% | 77% |
2nd pts | 35/71 | 30/60 |
%2nd pts | 49% | 50% |
Miyoshi managed to score 18 aces (6 per match). Milavsky scored 16 aces (5.3 per match). Miyoshi won 77% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Milavsky won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Miyoshi | Milavsky |
---|---|---|
Won | 11 | 7 |
Converted | 11/34 | 7/12 |
% Converted | 32% | 58% |
Conceded | 10 | 12 |
Saved | 8 | 9 |
% Saved | 80% | 75% |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Miyoshi broke his opponents 11 times with a 32% conversion rate. The Japanese lost his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Milavsky broke his opponents 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Milavsky conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Miyoshi | |||||
Q1 Moriya | Q3 Chung | R1 Rodriguez | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-1 | 7-5 7-65 | 7-5 5-1 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 25 | 18 | 57 | |
pts | 57-33 | 99-90 | 68-51 | 224-174 | |
Total points | 90 | 189 | 119 | 398 | |
Winners | 23 | 43 | 30 | 96 | |
%Winners | 40% | 43% | 44% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 5 | 3 | 10 | 18 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 29/49 | 58/89 | 37/57 | 124/195 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 65% | 65% | 64% | |
1st pts | 23/29 | 43/58 | 30/37 | 96/124 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 74% | 81% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 10/20 | 16/31 | 9/20 | 35/71 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 52% | 45% | 49% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 2 | 4 | 11 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 2/13 | 4/13 | 11/34 | |
Converted % | 63% | 15% | 31% | 32% | |
Conceded | 2 | 6 | 2 | 10 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 5/6 | 1/2 | 8 | |
Saved % | 100% | 83% | 50% | 78% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Milavsky | |||||
Q1 Rybakov | Q3 Takahashi | R1 Bouzige | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 1-2 ret. | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 13 | 20 | 57 | |
pts | 74-66 | 39-33 | 68-57 | 181-156 | |
Total points | 140 | 72 | 125 | 337 | |
Winners | 34 | 20 | 31 | 85 | |
%Winners | 46% | 51% | 46% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 5 | 5 | 6 | 16 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
1st in | 47/71 | 26/36 | 37/63 | 110/170 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 72% | 59% | 65% | |
1st pts | 34/47 | 20/26 | 31/37 | 85/110 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 77% | 84% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 13/24 | 4/10 | 13/26 | 30/60 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 40% | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 2/2 | 2/4 | 7/12 | |
Converted % | 50% | 100% | 50% | 58% | |
Conceded | 7 | 3 | 2 | 12 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 2/3 | 2/2 | 9 | |
Saved % | 71% | 67% | 100% | 79% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Tennis Scores in Little Rock Challenger
- Kenta MiyoshiMiyoshi – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (7-5 5-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Yi ZhouZhou (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Karue SellSell (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Tyler ZinkZink – Tung-Lin WuWu (7-63 5-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Govind NandaNanda (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Rafael JodarJodar (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Nicolas MejiaMejia (7-64 6-0) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Hyeon ChungChung (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael ZhengZheng – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Aziz DougazDougaz (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Nicolas KickerKicker (5-7 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Alexander KotzenKotzen (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Nicolas KickerKicker (5-7 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Rafael JodarJodar (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Tyler ZinkZink (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Paul JubbJubb (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-4) – H2H and prediction