Saba Purtseladze and Federico Cina will clash against each other in the final of the Tbilisi Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 1:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Cina who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Federico Cina is the pick to win this match.
Federico Cina -> 1.36
Saba Purtseladze -> 2.94

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Saba Purtseladze vs. Federico Cina

This will be the 2nd time that Saba Purtseladze and Federico Cina face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Cina (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.

The last time that they squared off, Cina won 7-6(4) 6-3 in the semifinal in M15 Sharm ElSheikh back in March 2025.

Saba Purtseladze

Saba Purtseladze

45 - 10win/loss

Hard
45-9
I Hard
0-1
Rank
290
High
237
LLLWLLWLLL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 51-26 50-16 0-3 1-6 0-1 0-0
2024 35-34 25-20 9-11 1-3 0-0 0-0
2023 47-37 44-27 1-7 2-3 0-0 0-0
2022 37-35 34-26 3-9 0-0 0-0 0-0
2021 28-23 20-16 8-7 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 286 (career-high), the Georgean reached the final after beating Giles Hussey 2-6 7-6(2) 7-5, Sergey Fomin 6-3 7-6(4), Daniil Glinka 7-6(5) 5-7 7-6(10) and Martin Damm 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(7).

In the semifinal, The Georgean defeated Damm (7-5 6-74 7-67).During the match, Purtseladze scored less points (5) than Damm. In fact, the world no. 286 won 105 points vs Damm’s. That means that Purtseladze was more focused during the important points. Purtseladze was exceptionally aggressive to blast 50 winners.

Talking about the service games, Purtseladze submerged his opponent with 24 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Saba Purtseladze was very effective on serve to win 82% (50/61) of his 1st serve and 58% (30/52) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Purtseladze broke Damm twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Georgean has conceded 3 set in this tournament to conquer 51% of the points he played.

Purtseladze has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (200-158). 45-9 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Purtseladze has an overall171-101 match record in the last 7 years on hard.

Purtseladze’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M25 Sharm ElSheikh.

The Georgean has an overall 45-10 win-loss record in 2025, 45-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Tbilisi Challenger

Purtseladze has never competed in this tournament before.

Tbilisi Challenger
Purtseladze's Record

Federico Cina

Federico Cina

15 - 6win/loss

Hard
14-2
I Hard
0-0
Clay
1-4
Rank
225
High
202
LLWWWWLLLL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 32-21 17-7 10-9 5-5 0-0 0-0
2024 31-23 18-15 13-8 0-0 0-0 0-0
2023 1-3 1-1 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0
2022 1-1 0-0 1-1 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 323 (career-high), the Italian reached the final after beating Petr Bar Biryukov 6-4 6-4, Ilya Snitari 6-1 7-5, Eliakim Coulibaly 6-4 7-6(4) and Charles Broom 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(5).

In the semifinal, The Italian defeated Broom (6-2 6-75 7-65). During the match Cina scored 107 points vs Broom’s 106. Federico was quite aggressive to blast 51 winners.

About the serving games, Cina fired 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Federico Cina lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Cina put 66% of his first serves in, winning 74% (51/69) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (17/35) on the 2nd serve. Federico broke Broom 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Italian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.

The Italian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and the Hersonissos 2 Challenger.

Federico has a compiled 15-6 win-loss record in 2025, 14-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Tbilisi Challenger
Cina's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

S.Purtseladze
F.Cina
8h:48
8h:48
Time on court​
6h:06
6h:06
!
2h:23
2h:23
Last match​
!
2h:16
2h:16
4
4
Match played
4
4
131
131
Games Played​
96
96
11
11
Set played​​
9
9
404
404
Total points​
319
319
101
101
Avg point​
79.8
79.8
194
194
Winners
138
138
48.5
48.5
Avg Winners​
34.5
34.5
48%
48%
Ratio winners
43%
43%
-- Serve --
61
61
Aces
22
22
!
15.3
15.3
Avg Aces
5.5
5.5
22
22
Double Faults
12
12
!
5.5
5.5
Avg Double Faults
3
3
194/244
194/244
1st won total​
138/173
138/173
!
80%
80%
1st won %
!
80%
80%
91/161
91/161
2nd won total​
62/115
62/115
57%
57%
2nd won %
54%
54%
-- Break Points --
5/16
5/16
BP won
12/23
12/23
1.3/4
1.3/4
Avg BP won
3/5.8
3/5.8
31%
31%
Won
!
52%
52%
15
15
Conceded
13
13
3.8
3.8
Avg Conceded
3.3
3.3
5
5
Broken
4
4
1.3
1.3
Avg Broken
1
1
10
10
Saved
9
9

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Purtseladze Cina
Match played 4 4
Tot Set 11 9
Tot Games 131 96
Pts 404-396 319-267
Total Points 800 586
Winners 194 138
%Winners 48% 43%

Both Purtseladze and Cina played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Saba Purtseladze dropped 3 sets, while Federico Cina lost 1 set. Purtseladze has played 2 sets more than Cina (11 vs 9). Therefore, Purtseladze played 35 games more than Cina. Saba scored 194 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Federico blasted 138 winners (43%).

Serve Performance

Serve Purtseladze Cina
Aces 61 22
Avg per match 15.3 5.5
1st in 244/405 173/288
%1st in 60% 60%
1st pts 194/244 138/173
%1st pts 80% 80%
2nd pts 91/161 62/115
%2nd pts 57% 54%

Purtseladze managed to score 61 aces (15.3 per match). Cina managed to score 22 aces (5.5 per match). Purtseladze won 80% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Cina won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Purtseladze Cina
Won 5 12
Converted 5/16 12/23
% Converted 31% 52%
Conceded 15 13
Saved 10 9
% Saved 67% 69%
Times Broken 5 4

The Georgean broke his opponents 5 times with a 31% conversion rate. Purtseladze dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Cina broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Federico conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.

Purtseladze
R1
Hussey
R2
Fomin
1/4
Glinka
1/2
Damm
Total
Score 2-6 7-62 7-5 6-3 7-64 7-65 5-7 7-610 7-5 6-74 7-67
Tot Set 3 2 3 3 11
Tot Games 33 22 38 38 131
pts 110-105 77-68 112-113 105-110 404-396
Total points 215 145 225 215 800
Winners 43 37 64 50 194
%Winners 39% 48% 57% 48% 48%
SERVE
Aces 9 15 13 24 61
Double Faults 5 6 4 7 22
1st in 58/99 51/82 74/111 61/113 244/405
% 1st in 59% 62% 67% 54% 60%
1st pts 43/58 37/51 64/74 50/61 194/244
% 1st pts 74% 73% 86% 82% 80%
2nd pts 24/41 19/31 18/37 30/52 91/161
% 2nd pts 59% 61% 49% 58% 57%
Breaks
Won 1 1 1 2 5
Converted 1/6 1/1 1/5 2/4 5/16
Converted % 17% 100% 20% 50% 31%
Conceded 7 4 3 1 15
Saved 5/7 4/4 1/3 0/1 10
Saved % 71% 100% 33% 0% 51%
Times Broken 2 0 2 1 5
Cina
R1
Bar
R2
Snitari
1/4
Coulibaly
1/2
Broom
Total
Score 6-4 6-4 6-1 7-5 6-4 7-64 6-2 6-75 7-65
Tot Set 2 2 2 3 9
Tot Games 20 19 23 34 96
pts 66-46 63-44 83-71 107-106 319-267
Total points 112 107 154 213 586
Winners 25 28 34 51 138
%Winners 38% 44% 41% 48% 43%
SERVE
Aces 2 3 7 10 22
Double Faults 2 0 9 1 12
1st in 26/48 32/56 46/80 69/104 173/288
% 1st in 54% 57% 58% 66% 60%
1st pts 25/26 28/32 34/46 51/69 138/173
% 1st pts 96% 88% 74% 74% 80%
2nd pts 15/22 13/24 17/34 17/35 62/115
% 2nd pts 68% 54% 50% 49% 54%
Breaks
Won 2 3 3 4 12
Converted 2/2 3/5 3/5 4/11 12/23
Converted % 100% 60% 60% 36% 52%
Conceded 0 1 10 2 13
Saved 0/0 1/1 8/10 0/2 9
Saved % 100% 80% 0% 45%
Times Broken 0 0 2 2 4

Upcoming matches in the draw