Charles Broom and Federico Cina will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Tbilisi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Cina who should win in 2 sets.
Federico Cina -> 1.39
Charles Broom -> 2.81
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Charles Broom vs. Federico Cina
There is no head to head record between Charles Broom and Federico Cina since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Charles Broom
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-22 | 34-15 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-33 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 14-13 | 8-7 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 320, Charles reached the semifinal after defeating Ricardas Berankis 4-6 6-4 7-6(5), Clement Chidekh 6-3 3-6 6-4 and Lukas Pokorny 3-6 6-4 6-0.
In the quarter against Pokorny, Charles recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-0). During the match, Broom scored 93 points vs Pokorny’s 75. Charles was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Broom fired 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Charles Broom lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Broom put 72% of his first serves in, winning 75% (43/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. Broom broke Pokorny 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit has dropped 3 set in this tournament to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Broom has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 62% of his matches (229-138). 12-7 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Broom has an aggregate108-59 record in the last 9 years on hard.
Broom’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Nottingham.
The Brit has a composed 12-8 win-loss record in 2025, 12-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tbilisi Challenger
Broom has never competed in this tournament before.
Federico Cina
14 - 6win/loss
225
202
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-21 | 17-7 | 10-9 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-23 | 18-15 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 323 (career-high), Federico got to the semifinal after beating Petr Bar Biryukov 6-4 6-4, Ilya Snitari 6-1 7-5 and Eliakim Coulibaly 6-4 7-6(4).
In the quarter, Federico had a good straight sets win against Coulibaly (6-4 7-64). During the match Cina scored 83 points vs Coulibaly’s 71. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Cina blasted 7 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Federico Cina lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Cina put 58% of his first serves in, winning 74% (34/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (17/34) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Coulibaly 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Italian hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Cina’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and the Hersonissos 2 Challenger.
Federico has a compiled 14-6 win-loss record in 2025, 13-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Broom | Cina |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 86 | 62 |
| Pts | 296-271 | 212-161 |
| Total Points | 567 | 373 |
| Winners | 121 | 87 |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% |
Both Broom and Cina played 3 matches. At the moment, Charles Broom lost 3 sets while Federico Cina hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Broom has played 3 sets more than Cina (9 vs 6). Therefore, Broom played 24 games more than Cina. Broom scored 121 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Cina managed to score 87 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Broom | Cina |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 184/269 | 104/184 |
| %1st in | 68% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 121/184 | 87/104 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 44/85 | 45/80 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 56% |
Broom blasted 15 aces (5 per match). Cina blasted 12 aces (4 per match). Broom won 66% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Cina won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Broom | Cina |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 8 |
| Converted | 14/33 | 8/12 |
| % Converted | 42% | 67% |
| Conceded | 20 | 11 |
| Saved | 9 | 9 |
| % Saved | 45% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 11 | 2 |
The Brit broke his opponents 14 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 11 times and he saved 45% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponents 8 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Broom | |||||
| R1 Berankis | R2 Chidekh | 1/4 Pokorny | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 7-65 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 28 | 25 | 86 | |
| pts | 105-104 | 98-92 | 93-75 | 296-271 | |
| Total points | 209 | 190 | 168 | 567 | |
| Winners | 42 | 36 | 43 | 121 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 37% | 46% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 3 | 3 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 58/94 | 69/96 | 57/79 | 184/269 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 72% | 72% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 42/58 | 36/69 | 43/57 | 121/184 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 52% | 75% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/36 | 18/27 | 11/22 | 44/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 67% | 50% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 6/10 | 4/10 | 14/33 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 60% | 40% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 9 | 6 | 20 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 4/9 | 4/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 44% | 67% | 44% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 5 | 2 | 11 | |
| Cina | |||||
| R1 Bar | R2 Snitari | 1/4 Coulibaly | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-1 7-5 | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 | 23 | 62 | |
| pts | 66-46 | 63-44 | 83-71 | 212-161 | |
| Total points | 112 | 107 | 154 | 373 | |
| Winners | 25 | 28 | 34 | 87 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 44% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 9 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 26/48 | 32/56 | 46/80 | 104/184 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 57% | 58% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 25/26 | 28/32 | 34/46 | 87/104 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 88% | 74% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 13/24 | 17/34 | 45/80 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 54% | 50% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 8/12 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 60% | 60% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/1 | 8/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 80% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Tbilisi Challenger
- Charles BroomBroom – Lukas PokornyPokorny (3-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (7-65 5-7 7-610) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (w/o) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Lukas PokornyPokorny (3-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (7-6(5) 5-7 7-6(10)) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (w/o) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Charles BroomBroom – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – (1-1) – H2H and prediction