
George Loffhagen and Martin Damm will clash against each other in the quarter of the Tbilisi Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is George Loffhagen who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, George Loffhagen is the pick to win this match.
George Loffhagen -> 1.6
Martin Damm -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head George Loffhagen vs. Martin Damm
This will be the 2nd time that George Loffhagen and Martin Damm fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Damm (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Damm won 7-6(5) 6-4 in the 1st round in M25 Sheffield back in 2023.
George Loffhagen
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 31-8 | 17-1 | 0-0 | 12-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2024 | 18-12 | 14-6 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 35-15 | 20-6 | 4-2 | 9-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 16-7 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 28-17 | 9-4 | 12-11 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 316 (career-high), the Brit reached the quarter after beating Zura Tkemaladze 6-2 6-1 and Ilia Simakin 6-4 7-5.
In the 2nd round, George had a good straight sets win against Simakin (6-4 7-5). During the match, Loffhagen scored 68 points vs Simakin’s 59. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Loffhagen bagged 14 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. George Loffhagen conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 62% of his first serves in, win 92% (33/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Simakin twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Loffhagen hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to win 60% of the points he played.
Loffhagen has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 64% of his matches (181-100). 17-1 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Loffhagen has an aggregate95-42 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
Loffhagen’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Roehampton,M25 Quinta do Lago,M25 Vale do Lobo and M25 Nottingham.
The Brit has an aggregate 29-5 win-loss record in 2025, 17-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tbilisi Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Martin Damm
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 30-10 | 28-7 | 0-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 15-20 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 740, the American reached the quarter after defeating Mukund Sasikumar 7-6(3) 7-6(2), Ajeet Rai 7-6(4) 7-5, Toby Samuel 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-3 and Robert Strombachs 6-1 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Damm had a good straight sets win against Strombachs (6-1 6-3). During the match Damm scored 52 points vs Strombachs’s 24. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Damm struck 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Martin Damm was extremely efficient on serve to win 96% (27/28) of his 1st serve and 71% (5/7) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Martin broke Strombachs 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Damm started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Damm’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M25 Tbilisi.
Martin has a composed 21-7 win-loss record in 2025, 19-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Loffhagen | Damm |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 4 | 9 |
Tot Games | 37 | 102 |
Pts | 123-83 | 331-272 |
Total Points | 206 | 603 |
Winners | 54 | 166 |
%Winners | 44% | 50% |
Loffhagen played 2 matches while Damm competed in 4 matches. Damm started his run from the qualifications while Loffhagen had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Martin Damm conceded 1 set while George Loffhagen hasn’t lost a set so far. Loffhagen has played 5 set(s) less than Damm (4 vs 9). Therefore, Loffhagen played 65 games less than Damm. Loffhagen scored 54 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Martin blasted 166 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Loffhagen | Damm |
---|---|---|
Aces | 25 | 70 |
Avg per match | 12.5 | 17.5 |
1st in | 58/90 | 189/284 |
%1st in | 64% | 67% |
1st pts | 54/58 | 166/189 |
%1st pts | 93% | 88% |
2nd pts | 18/32 | 51/95 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 54% |
Loffhagen bagged 25 aces (12.5 per match). Damm fired 70 aces (17.5 per match). Loffhagen won 93% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Damm won 88% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Loffhagen | Damm |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 7 |
Converted | 7/13 | 7/23 |
% Converted | 54% | 30% |
Conceded | 0 | 1 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Brit broke his opponents 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. The Brit quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. The American broke his opponents 7 times with a 30% conversion rate. Damm conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Loffhagen | ||||
R1 Tkemaladze |
R2 Simakin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 22 | 37 | |
pts | 55-24 | 68-59 | 123-83 | |
Total points | 79 | 127 | 206 | |
Winners | 21 | 33 | 54 | |
%Winners | 38% | 49% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 11 | 14 | 25 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 22/32 | 36/58 | 58/90 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 62% | 64% | |
1st pts | 21/22 | 33/36 | 54/58 | |
% 1st pts | 95% | 92% | 93% | |
2nd pts | 7/10 | 11/22 | 18/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 70% | 50% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 2/7 | 7/13 | |
Converted % | 83% | 29% | 54% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Damm | ||||||
Q1 Kumar Mukund |
Q3 Rai |
R1 Samuel |
R2 Strombachs |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-63 7-62 | 7-64 7-5 | 6-74 7-63 6-3 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 25 | 35 | 16 | 102 | |
pts | 80-68 | 83-73 | 116-107 | 52-24 | 331-272 | |
Total points | 148 | 156 | 223 | 76 | 603 | |
Winners | 47 | 32 | 60 | 27 | 166 | |
%Winners | 59% | 39% | 52% | 52% | 50% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 23 | 16 | 25 | 6 | 70 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 14 | |
1st in | 50/67 | 42/71 | 69/111 | 28/35 | 189/284 | |
% 1st in | 75% | 59% | 62% | 80% | 67% | |
1st pts | 47/50 | 32/42 | 60/69 | 27/28 | 166/189 | |
% 1st pts | 94% | 76% | 87% | 96% | 88% | |
2nd pts | 8/17 | 19/29 | 19/42 | 5/7 | 51/95 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 66% | 45% | 71% | 54% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
Converted | 0/2 | 2/11 | 1/5 | 4/5 | 7/23 | |
Converted % | 0% | 18% | 20% | 80% | 30% | |
Conceded | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | – | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Head 2 Head



Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (0-0) – H2H and prediction