Joanna Garland and Petra Marcinko will square off in the qualifications of the French Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:00 pm on Court 11. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Petra Marcinko who should win in 3 sets.
Petra Marcinko -> 1.56
Joanna Garland -> 2.43
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Joanna Garland vs. Petra Marcinko
There is no head to head record between Joanna Garland and Petra Marcinko since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Joanna Garland
28 - 9win/loss
127
120
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-21 | 16-12 | 12-3 | 1-2 | 4-2 | 13-2 |
| 2024 | 43-9 | 28-8 | 5-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 10-0 |
| 2023 | 39-23 | 17-11 | 2-3 | 0-3 | 10-4 | 10-2 |
| 2022 | 50-24 | 39-11 | 0-0 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-13 | 6-7 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 177 (career-high), Joanna got to the qualifications after defeating Celine Naef 7-6(3) 6-3.
In the qualifications, Joanna had a good straight sets win against Naef (7-63 6-3). During the match, Garland scored 80 points vs Naef’s 62. Garland was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Garland scored 4 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Joanna Garland was quite efficient on serve to win 74% (28/38) of her 1st serve and 53% (17/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve 3 times. Joanna broke Naef 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Garland has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 69% of her matches (256-116). 6-0 on clay in 2025. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Garland has an overall33-17 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the W35 Nairobi where she overcame Angella Okutoyi in the final 6-1 6-4 and the W35 Solarino where she defeated Weronika Falkowska in the final 6-1 6-2 and the W35 Solarino where she beat Viktoria Hruncakova in the final 7-6(4) 6-2.
Garland has an overall 28-9 win-loss record in 2025, 6-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the French Open
Petra Marcinko
18 - 12win/loss
114
114
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 57-24 | 28-11 | 18-7 | 11-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 21-17 | 3-2 | 11-11 | 7-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-18 | 12-7 | 20-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-13 | 2-2 | 25-7 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-6 | 6-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 209, Petra got to the qualifications after beating Aoi Ito 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications, Marcinko had a good straight sets win against Ito (7-5 6-2). During the match Marcinko scored 72 points vs Ito’s 51. The Croatian was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Marcinko scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 5 double faults. Petra Marcinko lost the serve 4 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Marcinko put 56% of her first serves in, winning 63% (25/40) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (15/32) on the 2nd serve. The Croatian broke Ito 7 times after converting 88% of her break points (7/8).
The Croatian has an overall 18-12 win-loss record in 2025, 5-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the French Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023 and 2024. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Garland | Marcinko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 20 |
| Pts | 80-62 | 72-51 |
| Total Points | 142 | 123 |
| Winners | 28 | 25 |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% |
Both Garland and Marcinko played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Garland and Marcinko have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Garland played 2 games more than Marcinko. The Chinese scored 28 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Marcinko struck 25 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Garland | Marcinko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 1 |
| 1st in | 38/70 | 40/72 |
| %1st in | 54% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 25/40 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 17/32 | 15/32 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 47% |
Garland recorded 4 aces . Marcinko blasted 1 ace . Garland won 74% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Marcinko won 63% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Garland | Marcinko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 7/8 |
| % Converted | 56% | 88% |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 |
| Saved | 2 | 7 |
| % Saved | 40% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Joanna broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Garland dropped her serve 3 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded. Marcinko broke her opponent 7 times with a 88% conversion rate. Petra conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 64% of the break points that she conceded.
| Garland | |||
| Q1 Naef | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 80-62 | 80-62 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/70 | 38/70 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/32 | 17/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Marcinko | |||
| Q1 Ito | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 72-51 | 72-51 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 40/72 | 40/72 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 25/40 | 25/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/32 | 15/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/8 | 7/8 | |
| Converted % | 88% | 88% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores – French Open
- Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko – Jana FettFett (1-6 6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nina StojanovicStojanovic – Margaux RouvroyRouvroy (3-6 7-5 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Oksana SelekhmetevaSelekhmeteva – Antonia RuzicRuzic (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – Marina StakusicStakusic (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rebeka MasarovaMasarova – Carson BranstineBranstine (6-0 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sara BejlekBejlek – Ena ShibaharaShibahara (7-5 2-6 7-610) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lola RadivojevicRadivojevic – Sofia CostoulasCostoulas (6-1 3-6 7-69) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Anastasiia SobolievaSobolieva – Julie BelgraverBelgraver (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ella SeidelSeidel – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (3-6 6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Fiona FerroFerro (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nao HibinoHibino – Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu (2-6 7-65 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kristina DmitrukDmitruk – Maddison InglisInglis (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Shuai ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria BrancaccioBrancaccio – Veronika ErjavecErjavec (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Sara ErraniErrani (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mananchaya SawangkaewSawangkaew – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Hanna ChangChang (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales – Xiyu WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miriam Bianca BulgaruBianca Bulgaru – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Julia RieraRiera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Francesca JonesJones (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebeka MasarovaMasarova – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Kristina DmitrukDmitruk (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko – Nina StojanovicStojanovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction