
Daniil Glinka and Henry Searle will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Tbilisi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Henry Searle who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Henry Searle is the pick to win this match.
Henry Searle -> 1.69
Daniil Glinka -> 2.07
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniil Glinka vs. Henry Searle
There is no head to head record between Daniil Glinka and Henry Searle since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Daniil Glinka


24 - 10win/loss
377
377

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 31-16 | 14-10 | 0-0 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 393, Glinka got to the 2nd round after beating Fajing Sun 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Daniil had a good straight sets win against Sun (6-3 6-4). During the match, Glinka scored 64 points vs Sun’s 55. Daniil was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Glinka scored 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniil Glinka was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (32/43) of his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Daniil broke Sun twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Glinka has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 55% of his matches (200-164). 7-4 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Glinka has an aggregate92-85 record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Estonian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Trento and M25 Trimbach.
Daniil has an aggregate 24-10 win-loss record in 2025, 7-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tbilisi Challenger
Daniil has never competed in this tournament before.
Henry Searle
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 19-14 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
2024 | 24-26 | 7-7 | 3-5 | 10-9 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 10-10 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 444, Searle got to the 2nd round after defeating Fabrizio Andaloro 6-7(4) 7-6(2) 6-3.
In the 1st round against Andaloro, Henry recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 7-62 6-3). During the match Searle scored 126 points vs Andaloro’s 117. Henry was extremely aggressive to blast 55 winners.
About the serving games, Searle fired 17 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Overall, Henry Searle was extremely efficient on serve to win 74% (55/74) of his 1st serve and 58% (30/52) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Searle broke Andaloro 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Searle’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Nottingham Challenger.
Henry has an aggregate 13-6 win-loss record in 2025, 5-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Glinka | Searle |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 19 | 35 |
Pts | 64-55 | 126-117 |
Total Points | 119 | 243 |
Winners | 32 | 55 |
%Winners | 50% | 44% |
Both Glinka and Searle played 1 match. At the moment, Henry Searle conceded 1 set while Daniil Glinka hasn’t dropped a set so far. Glinka has played 1 set(s) less than Searle (2 vs 3). Therefore, Glinka played 16 games less than Searle. The Estonian scored 32 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, Henry fired 55 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Glinka | Searle |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 17 |
Avg per match | 6 | 17 |
1st in | 43/65 | 74/126 |
%1st in | 66% | 59% |
1st pts | 32/43 | 55/74 |
%1st pts | 74% | 74% |
2nd pts | 12/22 | 30/52 |
%2nd pts | 55% | 58% |
Glinka struck 6 aces . Searle bagged 17 aces . Glinka won 74% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Searle won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Glinka | Searle |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 3 |
Converted | 2/5 | 3/11 |
% Converted | 40% | 27% |
Conceded | 2 | 16 |
Saved | 2 | 15 |
% Saved | 100% | 94% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Daniil broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Daniil was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Brit broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Searle conceded his serve once and he saved 94% of the break points that he conceded.
Glinka | |||
R1 Sun |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 64-55 | 64-55 | |
Total points | 119 | 119 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 50% | 50% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 43/65 | 43/65 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 32/43 | 32/43 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 12/22 | 12/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Searle | |||
R1 Andaloro |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-74 7-62 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
pts | 126-117 | 126-117 | |
Total points | 243 | 243 | |
Winners | 55 | 55 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 17 | 17 | |
Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
1st in | 74/126 | 74/126 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 55/74 | 55/74 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 30/52 | 30/52 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
Saved | 15/16 | 15 | |
Saved % | 94% | 94% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Tbilisi Challenger
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly – Maximus JonesJones (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Fabrizio AndaloroAndaloro (6-74 7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Giles HusseyHussey (2-6 7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Toby SamuelSamuel (6-74 7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Florent BaxBax – Kaichi UchidaUchida (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas PokornyPokorny – Alastair GrayGray (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Fajing SunSun (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sergey FominFomin – Aleksandre BakshiBakshi (6-3 6-75 6-1) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Kris Van WykVan Wyk (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (4-6 6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Ilya SnitariSnitari – Masamichi ImamuraImamura (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Johannus MondayMonday – Philip HenningHenning (6-4 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly – Maximus JonesJones (6-3 7-6(6)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sergey FominFomin – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Charles BroomBroom (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – (0-1) – H2H and prediction