Corentin Denolly and Daniel Michalski will square off in the 2nd round of the Skopje Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 8. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Michalski who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Michalski is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Michalski -> 1.666
Corentin Denolly -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Corentin Denolly vs. Daniel Michalski
This will be the 4th time that Corentin Denolly and Daniel Michalski play each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Denolly (see full H2H stats), 2-1 on clay.
The last time that they played, Michalski won 6-0 6-3 in the 1st round in M25 Antalya back in 2022.
Corentin Denolly
11 - 15win/loss
316
269
LWLLWLLLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12-18 | 3-5 | 8-11 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 55-23 | 0-0 | 55-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-18 | 0-0 | 32-15 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-20 | 0-0 | 39-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-24 | 2-4 | 23-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 302, the French player reached the 2nd round after defeating Nicolai Budkov Kjaer 7-6(2) 6-1.
In the 1st round, Denolly had a good straight sets win against Budkov Kjaer (7-62 6-1). During the match, Denolly scored 91 points vs Budkov Kjaer’s 72. Denolly was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Denolly wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Corentin Denolly lost the serve 3 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Denolly put 68% of his first serves in, winning 64% (32/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Budkov Kjaer 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Denolly has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (383-223). 7-9 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Denolly has an aggregate 285-147 record in the last years on clay.
Corentin has an overall 11-15 win-loss record in 2025, 7-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Skopje Challenger
Denolly has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Michalski
24 - 12win/loss
297
243
LWLWWLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-16 | 2-2 | 26-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-26 | 1-6 | 36-19 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-25 | 4-6 | 36-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-3 | 47-20 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 324, Daniel got to the 2nd round after beating Obrad Markovski 6-3 0-6 6-1, Lilian Marmousez 6-3 6-4 and Max Houkes 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(8).
In the 1st round, Michalski defeated Houkes (7-64 4-6 7-68).During the match Michalski scored less points (1) than Houkes. In fact, the world no. 302 won 117 points vs Houkes’s. That means that Michalski was more focused during the important points. The Pole was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Michalski managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniel Michalski lost the serve 7 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Michalski put 61% of his first serves in, winning 59% (41/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (21/45) on the 2nd serve. The Pole broke Houkes 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Daniel’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Antalya.
Michalski has an overall 24-12 win-loss record in 2025, 22-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Denolly | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 58 |
| Pts | 91-72 | 204-192 |
| Total Points | 163 | 396 |
| Winners | 32 | 73 |
| %Winners | 35% | 36% |
Denolly played 1 match while Michalski competed in 2 matches. Michalski started his run from the qualifications while Denolly had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Daniel Michalski lost 2 sets while Corentin Denolly hasn’t dropped a set so far. Denolly has played 4 set(s) less than Michalski (2 vs 6). Therefore, Denolly played 38 games less than Michalski. The French player scored 32 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel scored 73 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Denolly | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2.5 |
| 1st in | 50/74 | 117/192 |
| %1st in | 68% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 32/50 | 73/117 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 34/75 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 45% |
Denolly didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Michalski bagged 5 aces (2.5 per match). Denolly won 64% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Michalski won 62% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Denolly | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 11 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 11/22 |
| % Converted | 46% | 50% |
| Conceded | 13 | 22 |
| Saved | 10 | 11 |
| % Saved | 77% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 11 |
Denolly broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Corentin surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded. The Pole broke his opponents 11 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Pole conceded his serve 11 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Denolly | |||
| R1 Budkov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 91-72 | 91-72 | |
| Total points | 163 | 163 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 50/74 | 50/74 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 32/50 | 32/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 11/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Michalski | |||||
| Q1 Markovski |
Q3 Marmousez |
R1 Houkes |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 0-6 6-1 | 6-3 6-4 | 7-64 4-6 7-68 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 19 | 36 | 77 | |
| pts | 87-74 | – | 117-118 | 204-192 | |
| Total points | 161 | 0 | 235 | 396 | |
| Winners | 32 | 41 | 73 | ||
| %Winners | 37% | 0% | 35% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 8 | ||
| 1st in | 47/77 | / | 70/115 | 117/192 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 0% | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 32/47 | / | 41/70 | 73/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 0% | 59% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/30 | / | 21/45 | 34/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 0% | 47% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 11 | ||
| Converted | 5/12 | / | 6/10 | 11/22 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 0% | 60% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 13 | 22 | ||
| Saved | 5/9 | 0/ | 6/13 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 56% | – | 46% | 102% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 7 | 11 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLLLLW
LWLWWLLWWL Tennis Scores in Skopje Challenger
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Matej DodigDodig (6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Mili PoljicakPoljicak – Kalin IvanovskiIvanovski (6-4 6-75 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Max HoukesHoukes (7-64 4-6 7-68) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Manas Manoj DhamneManoj Dhamne (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Lilian MarmousezMarmousez (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Jelle SelsSels (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (6-72 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Maxim MrvaMrva (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (6-3 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (4-6 6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Marat SharipovSharipov – Yanaki MilevMilev (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Mili PoljicakPoljicak – Kalin IvanovskiIvanovski (6-4 6-7(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Lilian MarmousezMarmousez (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Maxim MrvaMrva (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (6-7(2) 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (6-3 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Matej DodigDodig (6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Christoph NegrituNegritu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Pedro CachinCachin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (2-1) – H2H and prediction
