Nerman Fatic and Gerard Campana Lee will square off in the qualifications of the Skopje Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 6. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 2 sets.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.34
Gerard Campana Lee -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Nerman Fatic vs. Gerard Campana Lee
This will be the 2nd time that Nerman Fatic and Gerard Campana Lee square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Campana (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Campana won 7-6(1) 4-6 6-2 in the 2nd round in the Skopje Challenger back in 2023.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-17 | 2-1 | 44-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-26 | 3-5 | 19-20 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 348, the Bosnian reached the qualifications after defeating Amar Huseinovic 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Fatic had a good straight sets win against Huseinovic (6-2 6-3). During the match, Fatic scored 58 points vs Huseinovic’s 35. Fatic was very aggressive to blast 15 winners.
Regarding the service games, Fatic made 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Nerman Fatic was quite effective on serve to win 79% (15/19) of his 1st serve and 71% (15/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Fatic broke Huseinovic 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Fatic has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (308-196). 22-6 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fatic has a compiled 271-157 match record in the last years on clay.
Fatic’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya,M15 Porec and M15 Dubrovnik.
The Bosnian has a composed 22-6 win-loss record in 2025, 22-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Skopje Challenger
Gerard Campana Lee
9 - 12win/loss
618
318
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-32 | 5-5 | 19-24 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-31 | 0-0 | 31-31 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 1-3 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 383, Campana reached the qualifications after beating Stefan Micov 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Campana had a good straight sets win against Micov (6-4 6-4). During the match Campana scored 73 points vs Micov’s 57. Gerard was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Campana made 2 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Gerard Campana Lee lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Campana put 53% of his first serves in, winning 69% (24/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the 2nd serve. The Korean broke Micov 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Gerard has an overall 9-12 win-loss record in 2025, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Skopje Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fatic | Campana |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 |
| Pts | 58-35 | 73-57 |
| Total Points | 93 | 130 |
| Winners | 15 | 24 |
| %Winners | 26% | 33% |
Both Fatic and Campana played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fatic and Campana have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fatic played 3 games less than Campana. The Bosnian scored 15 winners (26% of the total points). On the other side, The Korean bagged 24 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fatic | Campana |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 19/40 | 35/66 |
| %1st in | 48% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 15/19 | 24/35 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 17/31 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 55% |
Fatic recorded 7 aces . Campana made 2 aces . Fatic won 79% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Campana won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fatic | Campana |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 63% | 56% |
| Conceded | 1 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Bosnian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Bosnian surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Gerard broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Gerard conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fatic | |||
| Q1 Huseinovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-35 | 58-35 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 19/40 | 19/40 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 15/19 | 15/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 15/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Campana | |||
| Q1 Micov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 73-57 | 73-57 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 35/66 | 35/66 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 24/35 | 24/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 17/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nerman FaticFatic – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Jelle SelsSels (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Lilian MarmousezMarmousez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction