Daniel Michalski and Lilian Marmousez will square off in the qualifications of the Skopje Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lilian Marmousez who should win in 3 sets.
Lilian Marmousez -> 1.83
Daniel Michalski -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniel Michalski vs. Lilian Marmousez
There is no head to head record between Daniel Michalski and Lilian Marmousez since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Daniel Michalski
23 - 11win/loss
301
243
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 30-19 | 2-2 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 39-26 | 1-6 | 36-19 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-25 | 4-6 | 36-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 47-25 | 0-3 | 47-20 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 319, Michalski reached the qualifications after beating Obrad Markovski 6-3 0-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Pole defeated Markovski (6-3 0-6 6-1). During the match, Michalski scored 87 points vs Markovski’s 74. The Pole was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Michalski fired 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Daniel Michalski lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Michalski put 61% of his first serves in, winning 68% (32/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (13/30) on the 2nd serve. Michalski broke Markovski 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Michalski has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (262-154). 21-9 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Michalski has a compiled227-116 record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Pole’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Antalya.
Daniel has a composed 23-11 win-loss record in 2025, 21-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Skopje Challenger
The Pole has never competed in this tournament before.
Lilian Marmousez
11 - 5win/loss
435
378
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 32-10 | 5-3 | 26-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 57-22 | 14-9 | 42-12 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-15 | 13-3 | 9-9 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 15-17 | 1-2 | 11-12 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-18 | 15-9 | 8-7 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 393, Marmousez reached the qualifications after beating Daniel Cukierman 6-2 7-5.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Cukierman (6-2 7-5). During the match Marmousez scored 75 points vs Cukierman’s 60. Marmousez was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Marmousez struck 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Lilian Marmousez was extremely efficient on serve to win 71% (25/35) of his 1st serve and 59% (20/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Lilian broke Cukierman 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Lilian has an overall 11-5 win-loss record in 2025, 7-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Michalski | Marmousez |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 22 | 20 |
Pts | 87-74 | 75-60 |
Total Points | 161 | 135 |
Winners | 32 | 25 |
%Winners | 37% | 33% |
Both Michalski and Marmousez played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Michalski dropped 1 set while Lilian Marmousez hasn’t lost a set so far. Michalski has played 1 set more than Marmousez (3 vs 2). Therefore, Michalski played 2 games more than Marmousez. Michalski scored 32 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Lilian made 25 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Michalski | Marmousez |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 3 |
Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
1st in | 47/77 | 35/69 |
%1st in | 61% | 51% |
1st pts | 32/47 | 25/35 |
%1st pts | 68% | 71% |
2nd pts | 13/30 | 20/34 |
%2nd pts | 43% | 59% |
Michalski scored 3 aces . Marmousez made 3 aces . Michalski won 68% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Marmousez won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Michalski | Marmousez |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 4 |
Converted | 5/12 | 4/8 |
% Converted | 42% | 50% |
Conceded | 9 | 6 |
Saved | 5 | 5 |
% Saved | 56% | 83% |
Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
Daniel broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Michalski lost his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
Michalski | |||
Q1 Markovski | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 0-6 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 87-74 | 87-74 | |
Total points | 161 | 161 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 47/77 | 47/77 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 32/47 | 32/47 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 13/30 | 13/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Marmousez | |||
Q1 Cukierman | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 75-60 | 75-60 | |
Total points | 135 | 135 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 35/69 | 35/69 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
1st pts | 25/35 | 25/35 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 20/34 | 20/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nerman FaticFatic – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Jelle SelsSels (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Lilian MarmousezMarmousez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction