Ajeet Rai and Martin Damm will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Tbilisi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Damm who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Martin Damm is the pick to win this match.
Martin Damm -> 1.42
Ajeet Rai -> 2.69
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ajeet Rai vs. Martin Damm
There is no head to head record between Ajeet Rai and Martin Damm since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Ajeet Rai
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11-10 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-57 | 33-25 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 1-26 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-28 | 19-24 | 4-2 | 1-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-25 | 38-24 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-19 | 22-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 477, Rai got to the qualifications after defeating Olaf Pieczkowski 4-6 7-5 6-0.
In the qualifications against Pieczkowski, Rai recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-0). During the match, Rai scored 89 points vs Pieczkowski’s 73. Ajeet was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Rai scored 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Ajeet Rai was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (35/48) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. The Kiwi broke Pieczkowski 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Rai has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 52% of his matches (190-172). 8-7 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Rai has an overall163-125 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Ajeet has a compiled 11-9 win-loss record in 2025, 8-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tbilisi Challenger
The Kiwi has never competed in this tournament before.
Martin Damm
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-9 | 23-6 | 0-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 15-20 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 740, the American got to the qualifications after defeating Mukund Sasikumar 7-6(3) 7-6(2).
In the qualifications, Martin had a good straight sets win against Kumar Mukund (7-63 7-62). During the match Damm scored 80 points vs Kumar Mukund’s 68. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Damm overwhelmed his opponent with 23 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Martin Damm conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 75% of his first serves in, win 94% (47/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve.
Damm’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M25 Tbilisi.
Damm has a composed 18-7 win-loss record in 2025, 16-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rai | Damm |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 26 |
| Pts | 89-73 | 80-68 |
| Total Points | 162 | 148 |
| Winners | 35 | 47 |
| %Winners | 39% | 59% |
Both Rai and Damm played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ajeet Rai lost 1 set while Martin Damm hasn’t dropped a set so far. Rai has played 1 set more than Damm (3 vs 2). Therefore, Rai played 2 games more than Damm. Rai scored 35 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 47 winners (59%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rai | Damm |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 23 |
| 1st in | 48/77 | 50/67 |
| %1st in | 62% | 75% |
| 1st pts | 35/48 | 47/50 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 94% |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 8/17 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 47% |
Rai recorded 7 aces . Damm recorded 23 aces . Rai won 73% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Damm won 94% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rai | Damm |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 0 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 0/2 |
| % Converted | 55% | 0% |
| Conceded | 9 | 0 |
| Saved | 6 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Rai broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Ajeet surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. On the other side, Martin hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Rai | |||
| Q1 Pieczkowski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 89-73 | 89-73 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 48/77 | 48/77 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 35/48 | 35/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 16/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Damm | |||
| Q1 Kumar Mukund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 80-68 | 80-68 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 47 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 59% | 59% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 23 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 50/67 | 50/67 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 47/50 | 47/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 94% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/2 | 0/2 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLLWWL
LWWWWLWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fajing SunSun – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Richard BerankisBerankis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Florent BaxBax – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Semen PankinPankin – Sergey FominFomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (1-0) – H2H and prediction
