Nathan Trouve and Clement Chidekh will play each other in the qualifications of the Tbilisi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Clement Chidekh who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Clement Chidekh is the pick to win this match.
Clement Chidekh -> 1.21
Nathan Trouve -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Nathan Trouve vs. Clement Chidekh
There is no head to head record between Nathan Trouve and Clement Chidekh since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Nathan Trouve
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 5-7 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 4-3 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Nathan got to the qualifications after beating Egor Agafonov 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(6).
In the qualifications against Agafonov, Trouve recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-64 7-66). During the match, Trouve scored 123 points vs Agafonov’s 114. Trouve was pretty aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Trouve scored 4 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Nathan Trouve lost the serve 5 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Trouve put 56% of his first serves in, winning 70% (48/69) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (26/54) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Agafonov 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Trouve has a losing match record in the last 4 years having won 46% of his matches (11-13). 1-0 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Trouve has a composed9-10 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
The French player has a compiled 1-0 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tbilisi Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Clement Chidekh
11 - 16win/loss
234
184
WLWWWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31-20 | 27-8 | 0-2 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 64-26 | 17-7 | 7-6 | 39-11 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-17 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 24-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 26-5 | 23-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 290, Clement reached the qualifications after defeating Aleksandre Shvangiradze 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, Chidekh had a good straight sets win against Shvangiradze (6-1 6-2). During the match Chidekh scored 66 points vs Shvangiradze’s 42. The French player was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Chidekh scored 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Clement Chidekh conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Chidekh put 61% of his first serves in, winning 84% (26/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (8/20) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Shvangiradze 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
The French player has an overall 11-16 win-loss record in 2025, 7-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Trouve | Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 15 |
| Pts | 123-114 | 66-42 |
| Total Points | 237 | 108 |
| Winners | 48 | 26 |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% |
Both Trouve and Chidekh played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Nathan Trouve lost 1 set while Clement Chidekh hasn’t lost a set so far. Trouve has played 1 set more than Chidekh (3 vs 2). Therefore, Trouve played 21 games more than Chidekh. Nathan scored 48 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Clement scored 26 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Trouve | Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 5 |
| 1st in | 69/123 | 31/51 |
| %1st in | 56% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 48/69 | 26/31 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 26/54 | 8/20 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 40% |
Trouve managed to score 4 aces . Chidekh struck 5 aces . Trouve won 70% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Chidekh won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Trouve | Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 16 | 3 |
| Saved | 11 | 3 |
| % Saved | 69% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Nathan broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The French player dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Chidekh broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The French player was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Trouve | |||
| Q1 Agafonov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-64 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 36 | |
| pts | 123-114 | 123-114 | |
| Total points | 237 | 237 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 69/123 | 69/123 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 48/69 | 48/69 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/54 | 26/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
| Saved | 11/16 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Chidekh | |||
| Q1 Shvangiradze |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 66-42 | 66-42 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/51 | 31/51 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 26/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/20 | 8/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LW
WLWWWWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fajing SunSun – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kris Van WykVan Wyk – (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Richard BerankisBerankis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Florent BaxBax – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Semen PankinPankin – Sergey FominFomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (1-0) – H2H and prediction
