Luca Van Assche and Dino Prizmic will play each other in the final of the Zagreb Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dino Prizmic who should win in 3 sets.
Dino Prizmic -> 1.86
Luca Van Assche -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Luca Van Assche vs. Dino Prizmic
There is no head to head record between Luca Van Assche and Dino Prizmic since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Luca Van Assche
13 - 9win/loss
167
63
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-26 | 7-4 | 15-12 | 9-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-38 | 15-15 | 8-10 | 10-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-30 | 1-7 | 15-11 | 15-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-31 | 0-1 | 40-20 | 15-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-22 | 3-2 | 8-7 | 15-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 211, Van Assche reached the final after beating Dalibor Svrcina 6-2 6-1, Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-4 6-2, Filip Misolic 6-4 6-4 and Luka Pavlovic 6-3 6-2
.In the semifinal, The French player had a good straight sets win against Pavlovic (6-3 6-2). During the match, Van Assche scored 71 points vs Pavlovic’s 50. Luca was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van Assche scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Luca Van Assche was extremely efficient on serve to win 71% (32/45) of his 1st serve and 60% (6/10) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The French player broke Pavlovic 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The French player hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Van Assche has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (170-134). 7-4 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van Assche has a compiled84-54 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
The French player best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Monza Challenger and the Zagreb Challenger.
The French player has an overall 13-9 win-loss record in 2025, 7-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zagreb Challenger
Van Assche has never competed in this tournament before.
Dino Prizmic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-15 | 8-4 | 23-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 20-18 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 10-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-19 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-9 | 21-1 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 334, Prizmic reached the final after defeating Mirza Basic 6-1 6-2, Kyrian Jacquet 7-5 6-2, Jerome Kym 6-2 6-3 and Marco Trungelliti 6-3 6-7(5) 7-5.
In the semifinal, The Croatian defeated Trungelliti (6-3 6-75 7-5). During the match Prizmic scored 116 points vs Trungelliti’s 109. Prizmic was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Prizmic scored 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Dino Prizmic was very effective on serve to win 71% (41/58) of his 1st serve and 51% (23/45) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 4 times. Dino broke Trungelliti 6 times after converting 32% of his break points (6/19).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Dino has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Dino’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Lugano Challenger and the Zagreb Challenger.
Dino has an overall 15-7 win-loss record in 2025, 7-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zagreb Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van Assche | Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 70 | 86 |
| Pts | 279-209 | 315-247 |
| Total Points | 488 | 562 |
| Winners | 119 | 119 |
| %Winners | 43% | 38% |
Both Van Assche and Prizmic played 4 matches. At the moment, Dino Prizmic dropped 1 set while Luca Van Assche hasn’t lost a set so far. Van Assche has played 1 set(s) less than Prizmic (8 vs 9). Therefore, Van Assche played 16 games less than Prizmic. Luca scored 119 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Prizmic blasted 119 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van Assche | Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 1.5 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 174/232 | 167/291 |
| %1st in | 75% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 119/174 | 119/167 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 31/58 | 70/124 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 56% |
Van Assche managed to score 6 aces (1.5 per match). Prizmic managed to score 22 aces (5.5 per match). Van Assche won 68% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Prizmic won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van Assche | Prizmic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 18 | 19 |
| Converted | 18/41 | 19/39 |
| % Converted | 44% | 49% |
| Conceded | 14 | 23 |
| Saved | 9 | 16 |
| % Saved | 64% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 7 |
Luca broke his opponents 18 times with a 44% conversion rate. Luca surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. The Croatian broke his opponents 19 times with a 49% conversion rate. Prizmic conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van Assche | ||||||
| R1 Svrcina | R2 Kuzmanov | 1/4 Misolic | 1/2 Pavlovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 20 | 17 | 70 | |
| pts | 68-45 | 64-47 | 76-67 | 71-50 | 279-209 | |
| Total points | 113 | 111 | 143 | 121 | 488 | |
| Winners | 20 | 26 | 41 | 32 | 119 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 41% | 54% | 45% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 28/39 | 37/54 | 64/84 | 45/55 | 174/232 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 69% | 76% | 82% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 20/28 | 26/37 | 41/64 | 32/45 | 119/174 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 70% | 64% | 71% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 8/17 | 11/20 | 6/10 | 31/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 47% | 55% | 60% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 18 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 5/10 | 3/6 | 4/10 | 18/41 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 14 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 4/6 | 4/5 | 1/2 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 67% | 80% | 50% | 49% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
| Prizmic | ||||||
| R1 Basic | R2 Jacquet | 1/4 Kym | 1/2 Trungelliti | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | 7-5 6-2 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 6-75 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 20 | 17 | 34 | 86 | |
| pts | 56-27 | 77-61 | 66-50 | 116-109 | 315-247 | |
| Total points | 83 | 138 | 116 | 225 | 562 | |
| Winners | 20 | 33 | 25 | 41 | 119 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 43% | 38% | 35% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 25/43 | 51/83 | 33/62 | 58/103 | 167/291 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 61% | 53% | 56% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 20/25 | 33/51 | 25/33 | 41/58 | 119/167 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 65% | 76% | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/18 | 16/32 | 17/29 | 23/45 | 70/124 | |
| % 2nd pts | 78% | 50% | 59% | 51% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 19 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 6/8 | 3/7 | 6/19 | 19/39 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 75% | 43% | 32% | 49% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 11 | 5 | 7 | 23 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 8/11 | 5/5 | 3/7 | 16 | |
| Saved % | – | 73% | 100% | 43% | 54% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | |