
Patrick Kypson and Hernan Casanova will face off in the semifinal of the Bogota Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:30 am on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Kypson is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.4
Hernan Casanova -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Patrick Kypson vs. Hernan Casanova
There is no head to head record between Patrick Kypson and Hernan Casanova since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Patrick Kypson
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 23-6 | 16-3 | 7-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2024 | 26-27 | 8-11 | 4-7 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 435, Kypson reached the semifinal after defeating Renzo Olivo 6-0 7-6(1), Johan Alexander Rodriguez 6-3 6-4 and Elmar Ejupovic 7-6(6) 7-6(6).
In the quarter, Patrick had a good straight sets win against Ejupovic (7-66 7-66).During the match, Kypson scored less points (1) than Ejupovic. In fact, the world no. 435 won 92 points vs Ejupovic’s. That means that Kypson was more focused during the important points. Kypson was very aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kypson made 9 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Patrick Kypson was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (45/56) of his 1st serve and 54% (22/41) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Patrick hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Kypson has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (210-128). 5-1 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kypson has a compiled 96-45 record in the last years on clay.
Patrick has an overall 8-4 win-loss record in 2025, 5-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bogota Challenger
Kypson has never competed in this tournament before.
Hernan Casanova
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 23-15 | 0-0 | 23-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 32-24 | 0-0 | 32-23 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-27 | 0-2 | 29-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 45-32 | 3-3 | 42-28 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 503, Hernan got to the semifinal after defeating Mateus Alves 2-6 7-6(2) 7-5, Miguel Tobon 6-3 6-1 and Zdenek Kolar 4-6 6-3 6-1.
In the quarter against Kolar, The Argentine recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-1). During the match Casanova scored 94 points vs Kolar’s 76. Casanova was quite aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Casanova managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Hernan Casanova lost the serve once and he saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Casanova put 67% of his first serves in, winning 70% (46/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (18/33) on the 2nd serve. Casanova was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Kolar 4 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Argentine has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Hernan’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Santiago.
The Argentine has a composed 20-11 win-loss record in 2025, 20-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kypson | Casanova |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 3 |
Tot Set | 6 | 8 |
Tot Games | 64 | 75 |
Pts | 243-208 | 260-224 |
Total Points | 451 | 484 |
Winners | 108 | 109 |
%Winners | 44% | 42% |
Both Kypson and Casanova played 3 matches. At the moment, Hernan Casanova dropped 2 sets while Patrick Kypson hasn’t conceded a set so far. Kypson has played 2 set(s) less than Casanova (6 vs 8). Therefore, Kypson played 11 games less than Casanova. The American scored 108 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Hernan recorded 109 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kypson | Casanova |
---|---|---|
Aces | 29 | 6 |
Avg per match | 9.7 | 2 |
1st in | 137/241 | 155/254 |
%1st in | 57% | 61% |
1st pts | 108/137 | 109/155 |
%1st pts | 79% | 70% |
2nd pts | 50/104 | 52/99 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 53% |
Kypson blasted 29 aces (9.7 per match). Casanova managed to score 6 aces (2 per match). Kypson won 79% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Casanova won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kypson | Casanova |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 13 |
Converted | 8/18 | 13/26 |
% Converted | 44% | 50% |
Conceded | 24 | 26 |
Saved | 21 | 19 |
% Saved | 88% | 73% |
Times Broken | 3 | 7 |
The American broke his opponents 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Patrick lost his serve 3 times and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. The Argentine broke his opponents 13 times with a 50% conversion rate. Casanova conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
Kypson | |||||
R1 Olivo |
R2 Alexander |
1/4 Ejupovic |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 7-61 | 6-3 6-4 | 7-66 7-66 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | 26 | 64 | |
pts | 71-49 | 80-66 | 92-93 | 243-208 | |
Total points | 120 | 146 | 185 | 451 | |
Winners | 20 | 43 | 45 | 108 | |
%Winners | 28% | 54% | 49% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 4 | 16 | 9 | 29 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 6 | 12 | |
1st in | 27/59 | 54/85 | 56/97 | 137/241 | |
% 1st in | 46% | 64% | 58% | 57% | |
1st pts | 20/27 | 43/54 | 45/56 | 108/137 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 80% | 80% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 18/32 | 10/31 | 22/41 | 50/104 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 32% | 54% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 0 | 8 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 3/7 | 0/3 | 8/18 | |
Converted % | 63% | 43% | 0% | 44% | |
Conceded | 7 | 9 | 8 | 24 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 8/9 | 8/8 | 21 | |
Saved % | 71% | 89% | 100% | 87% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Casanova | |||||
R1 Alves |
R2 Tobon |
1/4 Kolar |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 7-62 7-5 | 6-3 6-1 | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 33 | 16 | 26 | 75 | |
pts | 101-99 | 65-49 | 94-76 | 260-224 | |
Total points | 200 | 114 | 170 | 484 | |
Winners | 37 | 26 | 46 | 109 | |
%Winners | 37% | 40% | 49% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
1st in | 52/103 | 37/52 | 66/99 | 155/254 | |
% 1st in | 50% | 71% | 67% | 61% | |
1st pts | 37/52 | 26/37 | 46/66 | 109/155 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 70% | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 26/51 | 8/15 | 18/33 | 52/99 | |
% 2nd pts | 51% | 53% | 55% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 5/12 | 4/4 | 13/26 | |
Converted % | 40% | 42% | 100% | 50% | |
Conceded | 8 | 4 | 14 | 26 | |
Saved | 3/8 | 3/4 | 13/14 | 19 | |
Saved % | 38% | 75% | 93% | 69% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Bogota Challenger
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (7-66 7-66) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Zdenek KolarKolar (4-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateo Barreiros ReyesBarreiros Reyes – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (1-0) – H2H and prediction