
Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ivan Gakhov will play each other in the quarter of the Tunis Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 3:00 pm on COURT AZIZ ZOUHIR. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ivan Gakhov who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ivan Gakhov is the pick to win this match.
Ivan Gakhov -> 1.57
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Ivan Gakhov
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ivan Gakhov since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong


9 - 12win/loss
172
128

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 15-18 | 6-8 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 174, the reached the quarter after beating Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez 6-2 6-2 and Murkel Dellien 7-5 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Lam Coleman Wong had a good straight sets win against Alejandro Dellien Velasco (7-5 7-5). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 85 points vs Alejandro Dellien Velasco’s 81. Chak was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong scored just 1 ace and he committed only 4 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 63% of his first serves in, winning 62% (29/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (12/28) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Alejandro Dellien Velasco 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (141-111). 2-2 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate20-19 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Chak has an overall 9-11 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tunis Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong has never competed in this tournament before.
Ivan Gakhov
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 31-19 | 2-2 | 24-13 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 36-35 | 1-2 | 35-32 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 30-30 | 2-4 | 26-21 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 56-32 | 1-3 | 53-26 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 43-28 | 0-1 | 38-23 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 317, Gakhov got to the quarter after beating Niels Visker 6-2 7-6(3), Buvaysar Gadamauri 4-6 7-6(4) 7-5, Alex Marti Pujolras 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-1 and Bernard Tomic 6-1 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Ivan had a good straight sets win against Tomic (6-1 6-4). During the match Gakhov scored 63 points vs Tomic’s 45. The Russian was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Gakhov scored 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ivan Gakhov lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Gakhov put 60% of his first serves in, winning 72% (26/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. Ivan broke Tomic 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gakhov started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Gakhov’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Santa margherita di Pula.
Gakhov has an aggregate 24-13 win-loss record in 2025, 17-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Gakhov |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 4 | 10 |
Tot Games | 40 | 106 |
Pts | 144-118 | 362-319 |
Total Points | 262 | 681 |
Winners | 47 | 144 |
%Winners | 33% | 40% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches while Gakhov competed in 4 matches. Gakhov started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Ivan Gakhov lost 2 sets while Chak Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t dropped a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 6 set(s) less than Gakhov (4 vs 10). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 66 games less than Gakhov. Chak scored 47 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Ivan made 144 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Gakhov |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 14 |
Avg per match | 2 | 3.5 |
1st in | 71/119 | 196/335 |
%1st in | 60% | 59% |
1st pts | 47/71 | 144/196 |
%1st pts | 66% | 73% |
2nd pts | 23/48 | 67/139 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 48% |
Lam Coleman Wong blasted 4 aces (2 per match). Gakhov struck 14 aces (3.5 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 66% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Gakhov won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Gakhov |
---|---|---|
Won | 12 | 19 |
Converted | 12/23 | 19/42 |
% Converted | 52% | 45% |
Conceded | 10 | 28 |
Saved | 4 | 17 |
% Saved | 40% | 61% |
Times Broken | 6 | 11 |
Chak broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Chak surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Ivan broke his opponents 19 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Russian conceded his serve 11 times and he saved 61% of the break points that he conceded.
Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
R1 Pacheco Mendez |
R2 Alejandro Dellien Velasco |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | 7-5 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 24 | 40 | |
pts | 59-37 | 85-81 | 144-118 | |
Total points | 96 | 166 | 262 | |
Winners | 18 | 29 | 47 | |
%Winners | 31% | 34% | 33% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
1st in | 24/44 | 47/75 | 71/119 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 63% | 60% | |
1st pts | 18/24 | 29/47 | 47/71 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 62% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 11/20 | 12/28 | 23/48 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 43% | 48% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 6 | 6 | 12 | |
Converted | 6/10 | 6/13 | 12/23 | |
Converted % | 60% | 46% | 52% | |
Conceded | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 3/7 | 4 | |
Saved % | 33% | 43% | 38% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Gakhov | ||||||
Q1 Visker |
Q3 Gadamauri |
R1 Marti |
R2 Tomic |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-63 | 4-6 7-64 7-5 | 6-75 7-63 6-1 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 35 | 33 | 17 | 106 | |
pts | 72-61 | 112-115 | 115-98 | 63-45 | 362-319 | |
Total points | 133 | 227 | 213 | 108 | 681 | |
Winners | 29 | 47 | 42 | 26 | 144 | |
%Winners | 40% | 42% | 37% | 41% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 19 | |
1st in | 34/61 | 64/116 | 62/98 | 36/60 | 196/335 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 55% | 63% | 60% | 59% | |
1st pts | 29/34 | 47/64 | 42/62 | 26/36 | 144/196 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 73% | 68% | 72% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 16/27 | 26/52 | 14/36 | 11/24 | 67/139 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 50% | 39% | 46% | 48% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 19 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/10 | 8/17 | 5/8 | 19/42 | |
Converted % | 43% | 30% | 47% | 63% | 45% | |
Conceded | 5 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 28 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 6/9 | 4/9 | 3/5 | 17 | |
Saved % | 80% | 67% | 44% | 60% | 126% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
Head 2 Head



Upcoming matches in the draw
- Federico CoriaCoria – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Chris RodeschRodesch (0-0) – H2H and prediction