Filip Misolic and Kimmer Coppejans will face off in the 2nd round of the Zagreb Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Filip Misolic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Filip Misolic is the pick to win this match.
Filip Misolic -> 1.48
Kimmer Coppejans -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Filip Misolic vs. Kimmer Coppejans
This will be the 3rd time that Filip Misolic and Kimmer Coppejans square off. The head to head is 1-1 for Misolic and Coppejans (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they played, Coppejans won 6-2 6-2 in the qualifications in at the U.S. Open back in 2023.
Filip Misolic
27 - 11win/loss
155
126
WLWWWWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-12 | 7-2 | 19-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 16-22 | 1-4 | 15-16 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-28 | 6-9 | 25-13 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-18 | 5-4 | 31-12 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-16 | 0-1 | 44-13 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 180, the Austrian got to the 2nd round after defeating Max Houkes 6-1 6-1.
In the 1st round, Misolic had a good straight sets win against Houkes (6-1 6-1). During the match, Misolic scored 60 points vs Houkes’s 30. Misolic was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Misolic scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 1 double fault. Filip Misolic was exceptionally effective on serve to win 85% (22/26) of his 1st serve and 75% (6/8) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Misolic broke Houkes 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Misolic has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 62% of his matches (186-112). 17-6 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Misolic has an overall150-74 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Prague Challenger where he overcame Guy Den Ouden in the final 6-4 6-0.
The Austrian has a composed 27-11 win-loss record in 2025, 17-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zagreb Challenger
Kimmer Coppejans
26 - 12win/loss
264
97
WLWLWWLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-13 | 14-6 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-8 | 22-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 275, the Belgian got to the 2nd round after defeating Norbert Gombos 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Gombos (6-3 6-3). During the match Coppejans scored 68 points vs Gombos’s 53. Coppejans was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Coppejans managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Kimmer Coppejans was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kimmer broke Gombos 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Kimmer’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger and the Murcia Challenger.
Coppejans has an overall 26-12 win-loss record in 2025, 12-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zagreb Challenger
The Belgian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Misolic | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 18 |
| Pts | 60-30 | 68-53 |
| Total Points | 90 | 121 |
| Winners | 22 | 26 |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% |
Both Misolic and Coppejans played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Misolic and Coppejans have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Misolic played 4 games less than Coppejans. Filip scored 22 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Coppejans managed to score 26 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Misolic | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
| 1st in | 26/34 | 36/65 |
| %1st in | 76% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 26/36 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 6/8 | 16/29 |
| %2nd pts | 75% | 55% |
Misolic managed to score 1 ace . Coppejans also blasted 2 aces . Misolic won 85% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Misolic | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 38% | 57% |
| Conceded | 0 | 7 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Filip broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Austrian had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Kimmer broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Kimmer conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Misolic | |||
| R1 Houkes |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 60-30 | 60-30 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 22/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Coppejans | |||
| R1 Gombos |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 68-53 | 68-53 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 36/65 | 36/65 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | 26/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 16/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWWWWWWL
WLWLWWLLWW Tennis Scores in Zagreb Challenger
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (1-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Mirza BasicBasic (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-2 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Mili PoljicakPoljicak – Nerman FaticFatic (4-6 6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Norbert GombosGombos (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Jurij RodionovRodionov (7-5 6-73 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Max HoukesHoukes (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (6-2 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Milos KarolKarol – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Matej DodigDodig (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (7-63 6-0) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Gonzalo BuenoBueno – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (6-2 6-79 6-3) – See score progression
- Mili PoljicakPoljicak – Nerman FaticFatic (4-6 6-3 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Norbert GombosGombos (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-2 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (6-2 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Milos KarolKarol – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Mirza BasicBasic (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-2 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo MenaMena – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Filip MisolicMisolic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
