Daniel Milavsky and Johan Alexander Rodriguez will face off in the qualifications of the Bogota Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Milavsky who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Milavsky is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Milavsky -> 1.36
Johan Alexander Rodriguez -> 2.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniel Milavsky vs. Johan Alexander Rodriguez
There is no head to head record between Daniel Milavsky and Johan Alexander Rodriguez since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Daniel Milavsky
11 - 3win/loss
687
687
LWLWLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11-3 | 5-0 | 1-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 12-3 | 3-2 | 2-1 | 7-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 8-4 | 7-4 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 687 (career-high), the American got to the qualifications after defeating Nicolas Villalon 6-3 2-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Milavsky defeated Villalon (6-3 2-6 6-3). During the match, Milavsky scored 92 points vs Villalon’s 82. The American was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Milavsky blasted 3 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Daniel Milavsky lost the serve 4 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Milavsky put 49% of his first serves in, winning 80% (33/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (17/42) on the 2nd serve. Milavsky broke Villalon 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Milavsky has a fantastic record in the last 4 years having won 74% of his matches (32-11). 1-0 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Milavsky has an aggregate4-2 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
Daniel’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Kingston and M15 Sherbrooke.
The American has a composed 11-2 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bogota Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Johan Alexander Rodriguez
4 - 2win/loss
720
645
LWWWLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5-3 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-22 | 23-12 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-16 | 4-1 | 19-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-18 | 3-7 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 720, the Colombian got to the qualifications after defeating Ignacio Carou 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Alexander had a good straight sets win against Carou (6-4 6-2). During the match Alexander scored 64 points vs Carou’s 42. Alexander was very aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Alexander recorded 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Johan Alexander Rodriguez was pretty effective on serve to win 83% (20/24) of his 1st serve and 80% (16/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Johan broke Carou 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Alexander has a composed 3-2 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bogota Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023 and 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Milavsky | Alexander |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 18 |
| Pts | 92-82 | 64-42 |
| Total Points | 174 | 106 |
| Winners | 33 | 20 |
| %Winners | 36% | 31% |
Both Milavsky and Alexander played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Milavsky lost 1 set while Johan Alexander Rodriguez hasn’t dropped a set so far. Milavsky has played 1 set more than Alexander (3 vs 2). Therefore, Milavsky played 8 games more than Alexander. Milavsky scored 33 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Alexander scored 20 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Milavsky | Alexander |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 41/83 | 24/44 |
| %1st in | 49% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 20/24 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 17/42 | 16/20 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 80% |
Milavsky scored 3 aces . Alexander bagged 4 aces . Milavsky won 80% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Alexander won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 80% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Milavsky | Alexander |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 3/10 |
| % Converted | 42% | 30% |
| Conceded | 12 | 0 |
| Saved | 8 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
Daniel broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The American lost his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Alexander broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Alexander was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Milavsky | |||
| Q1 Villalon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 92-82 | 92-82 | |
| Total points | 174 | 174 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 41/83 | 41/83 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 33/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/42 | 17/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Alexander | |||
| Q1 Carou |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 64-42 | 64-42 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 24/44 | 24/44 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 20/24 | 20/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/20 | 16/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWWW
LWWWLLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Matias SotoSoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto CidCid – Kiranpal PannuPannu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Karue SellSell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ignacio MonzonMonzon – Alexander KlintcharovKlintcharov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Peter BertranBertran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan MccormickMccormick – Juan Sebastian GomezSebastian Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateo Barreiros ReyesBarreiros Reyes – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – Leonardo AboianAboian (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Igor GimenezGimenez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
