Dominic Stricker and Kimmer Coppejans will face off in the quarter of the Francavilla Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 3:00 pm on CAMPO CENTRALE. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kimmer Coppejans who should win in 3 sets.
Kimmer Coppejans -> 1.64
Dominic Stricker -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Dominic Stricker vs. Kimmer Coppejans
This will be the 2nd time that Dominic Stricker and Kimmer Coppejans square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Coppejans (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Coppejans won 6-2 6-2 in the 1st round in the Rome Challenger back in April 2025.
Dominic Stricker
12 - 10win/loss
373
88
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-21 | 0-5 | 11-9 | 4-5 | 2-1 | 4-1 |
| 2024 | 12-15 | 7-6 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-25 | 8-3 | 8-5 | 14-13 | 6-3 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 37-25 | 2-5 | 8-7 | 22-10 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-19 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 14-7 | 2-2 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 258, Stricker got to the quarter after beating Paul Jubb 7-6(9) 6-3 and Kyrian Jacquet 1-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Jacquet, Stricker recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-3 6-4). During the match, Stricker scored 94 points vs Jacquet’s 88. Stricker was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Stricker recorded 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Dominic Stricker was very efficient on serve to win 72% (36/50) of his 1st serve and 57% (20/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Swiss broke Jacquet twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Dominic has dropped 1 set in this tournament to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Stricker has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (131-100). 8-3 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Stricker has an aggregate35-27 record in the last 8 years on clay.
Stricker’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Trimbach and M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
The Swiss has an aggregate 12-10 win-loss record in 2025, 8-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Francavilla Challenger
Stricker has never competed in this tournament before.
Kimmer Coppejans
25 - 11win/loss
225
97
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-29 | 20-10 | 24-16 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-8 | 22-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 275, Kimmer got to the quarter after beating Andrea Collarini 2-6 7-5 1-0 ret. and Marco Trungelliti 7-6(5) 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Trungelliti (7-65 6-1). During the match Coppejans scored 81 points vs Trungelliti’s 66. Kimmer was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Coppejans bagged 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 62% of his first serves in, winning 61% (30/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the 2nd serve. Kimmer broke Trungelliti 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Belgian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger and the Murcia Challenger.
Coppejans has a composed 25-11 win-loss record in 2025, 11-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stricker | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 48 | 41 |
| Pts | 176-160 | 157-138 |
| Total Points | 336 | 295 |
| Winners | 73 | 61 |
| %Winners | 41% | 39% |
Both Stricker and Coppejans played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Dominic Stricker lost 1 set, while Kimmer Coppejans conceded 1 set. Stricker has played 1 set(s) less than Coppejans (5 vs 6). However, it’s interesting to notice that Stricker played 7 games more than Coppejans. Dominic scored 73 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Kimmer bagged 61 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stricker | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 2.5 |
| 1st in | 99/168 | 91/153 |
| %1st in | 59% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 73/99 | 61/91 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 39/69 | 33/62 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 53% |
Stricker made 13 aces (6.5 per match). Coppejans struck 5 aces (2.5 per match). Stricker won 74% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stricker | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 6/16 |
| % Converted | 36% | 38% |
| Conceded | 15 | 19 |
| Saved | 12 | 14 |
| % Saved | 80% | 74% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
Stricker broke his opponents 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Swiss surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Kimmer broke his opponents 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. Coppejans conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 74% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stricker | ||||
| R1 Jubb | R2 Jacquet | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-69 6-3 | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 26 | 48 | |
| pts | 82-72 | 94-88 | 176-160 | |
| Total points | 154 | 182 | 336 | |
| Winners | 37 | 36 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 38% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 49/83 | 50/85 | 99/168 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 37/49 | 36/50 | 73/99 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 72% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 20/35 | 39/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/6 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 33% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 10 | 15 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 8/10 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Coppejans | ||||
| R1 Collarini | R2 Trungelliti | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-5 1-0 ret. | 7-65 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 20 | 41 | |
| pts | 76-72 | 81-66 | 157-138 | |
| Total points | 148 | 147 | 295 | |
| Winners | 31 | 30 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 37% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 42/74 | 49/79 | 91/153 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 62% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 31/42 | 30/49 | 61/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 61% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/32 | 19/30 | 33/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 63% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 4/6 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 67% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 6 | 19 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 4/6 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 67% | 72% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Benoit PairePaire (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-1) – H2H and prediction