Martin Landaluce and Daniel Evans will square off in the 2nd round of the Prague Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Landaluce who should win in 3 sets.
Martin Landaluce -> 1.55
Daniel Evans -> 2.33
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Martin Landaluce vs. Daniel Evans
There is no head to head record between Martin Landaluce and Daniel Evans since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Martin Landaluce
8 - 11win/loss
147
133
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 11-13 | 5-2 | 6-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 42-24 | 23-9 | 13-11 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-27 | 11-10 | 15-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 147, Martin got to the 2nd round after defeating Jurij Rodionov 5-7 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round against Rodionov, Landaluce recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-2 7-5). During the match, Landaluce scored 117 points vs Rodionov’s 101. The Spaniard was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Landaluce blasted 2 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Martin Landaluce lost the serve 6 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Landaluce put 70% of his first serves in, winning 64% (46/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (12/31) on the 2nd serve. Landaluce broke Rodionov 8 times after converting 47% of his break points (8/17).
Landaluce has a winning win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 54% of his matches (76-64). 3-6 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Landaluce has a compiled31-34 record in the last 4 years on clay.
The Spaniard’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Canberra Challenger.
Landaluce has a compiled 8-11 win-loss record in 2025, 3-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague Challenger
Landaluce has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Evans
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 9-14 | 2-4 | 6-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 18-26 | 8-11 | 3-8 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 19-27 | 11-15 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 35-27 | 19-13 | 4-7 | 6-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-24 | 12-11 | 6-6 | 3-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 190, Evans reached the 2nd round after defeating Lloyd Harris 6-1 7-5.
In the 1st round, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Lloyd (6-1 7-5). During the match Evans scored 72 points vs Lloyd’s 54. Daniel was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Evans wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Daniel Evans lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Evans put 67% of his first serves in, winning 67% (31/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (11/23) on the 2nd serve. Evans broke Lloyd 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Daniel has an aggregate 7-11 win-loss record in 2025, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Landaluce | Evans |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 32 | 19 |
Pts | 117-101 | 72-54 |
Total Points | 218 | 126 |
Winners | 46 | 31 |
%Winners | 39% | 43% |
Both Landaluce and Evans played 1 match. At the moment, Martin Landaluce lost 1 set while Daniel Evans hasn’t lost a set so far. Landaluce has played 1 set more than Evans (3 vs 2). Therefore, Landaluce played 13 games more than Evans. Landaluce scored 46 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel fired 31 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Landaluce | Evans |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 0 |
Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
1st in | 72/103 | 46/69 |
%1st in | 70% | 67% |
1st pts | 46/72 | 31/46 |
%1st pts | 64% | 67% |
2nd pts | 12/31 | 11/23 |
%2nd pts | 39% | 48% |
Landaluce struck 2 aces . Evans didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Landaluce won 64% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Evans won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Landaluce | Evans |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 5 |
Converted | 8/17 | 5/12 |
% Converted | 47% | 42% |
Conceded | 11 | 3 |
Saved | 5 | 1 |
% Saved | 45% | 33% |
Times Broken | 6 | 2 |
Martin broke his opponent 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. Martin conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 45% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
Landaluce | |||
R1 Rodionov | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 5-7 6-2 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
pts | 117-101 | 117-101 | |
Total points | 218 | 218 | |
Winners | 46 | 46 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
1st in | 72/103 | 72/103 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
1st pts | 46/72 | 46/72 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
2nd pts | 12/31 | 12/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 8 | 8 | |
Converted | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
Converted % | 47% | 47% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 5/11 | 5 | |
Saved % | 45% | 45% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 6 |
Evans | |||
R1 Lloyd | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 72-54 | 72-54 | |
Total points | 126 | 126 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 46/69 | 46/69 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
1st pts | 31/46 | 31/46 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 11/23 | 11/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Tennis Scores in Prague Challenger
- Petr BrunclikBrunclik – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Guy Den OudenDen Ouden – Sumit NagalNagal (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg – Dmitry PopkoPopko (7-63 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (6-2 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (4-6 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Henrique RochaRocha (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexander BlockxBlockx – Hady HabibHabib (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Maxim MrvaMrva (6-0 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Jurij RodionovRodionov (5-7 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Lloyd HarrisHarris (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Petr BrunclikBrunclik – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (4-6 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Maxim MrvaMrva (6-0 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg – Dmitry PopkoPopko (7-6(3) 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Jan KumstatKumstat (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (6-2 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Guy Den OudenDen Ouden – Sumit NagalNagal (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Henrique RochaRocha (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexander BlockxBlockx – Hady HabibHabib (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (1-0) – H2H and prediction