Maria Sakkari and Maja Chwalinska will face off in the qualifications of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 10:00 am on PIETRANGELI. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maria Sakkari who should win in 2 sets.
Maria Sakkari -> 1.15
Maja Chwalinska -> 4.85
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Maria Sakkari vs. Maja Chwalinska
There is no head to head record between Maria Sakkari and Maja Chwalinska since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Maria Sakkari
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-29 | 14-19 | 7-5 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-17 | 12-8 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-25 | 26-17 | 5-4 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-23 | 21-12 | 8-5 | 4-2 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-20 | 23-13 | 9-4 | 5-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 81, the Greek reached the qualifications after beating Chloe Paquet 4-6 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications against Paquet, Maria recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-2). During the match, Sakkari scored 101 points vs Paquet’s 89. Sakkari was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sakkari blasted 5 aces and she committed only 7 double faults. Maria Sakkari lost the serve 3 times and she saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Sakkari put 65% of her first serves in, winning 68% (43/63) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (16/34) on the 2nd serve. Maria broke Paquet 5 times after converting 38% of her break points (5/13).
Sakkari has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of her matches (301-215). 5-3 on clay in 2025. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Sakkari has an overall 90-55 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Maria has an aggregate 11-14 win-loss record in 2025, 5-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Maja Chwalinska
9 - 10win/loss
133
121
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-19 | 4-2 | 21-13 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| 2024 | 48-21 | 12-6 | 27-10 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 23-19 | 8-6 | 12-10 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-15 | 13-5 | 16-6 | 5-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-11 | 3-3 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 124, Maja reached the qualifications after defeating Yuliia Starodubtseva 6-7(6) 7-5 6-1.
In the qualifications against Starodubtseva, Maja recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-76 7-5 6-1). During the match Chwalinska scored 124 points vs Starodubtseva’s 104. The Pole was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Chwalinska bagged 3 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Maja Chwalinska lost the serve 5 times and she saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Chwalinska put 71% of her first serves in, winning 54% (42/78) of the points behind her 1st serve and 63% (20/32) on the 2nd serve. The Pole broke Starodubtseva 9 times after converting 60% of her break points (9/15).
The Pole’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Antalya.
Chwalinska has an aggregate 9-10 win-loss record in 2025, 4-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Chwalinska has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sakkari | Chwalinska |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 32 |
| Pts | 101-89 | 124-104 |
| Total Points | 190 | 228 |
| Winners | 43 | 42 |
| %Winners | 43% | 34% |
Both Sakkari and Chwalinska played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Maria Sakkari dropped 1 set, while Maja Chwalinska conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Sakkari and Chwalinska have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Sakkari played 5 games less than Chwalinska. Sakkari scored 43 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Maja scored 42 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sakkari | Chwalinska |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 63/97 | 78/110 |
| %1st in | 65% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 43/63 | 42/78 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 54% |
| 2nd pts | 16/34 | 20/32 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 63% |
Sakkari struck 5 aces . Chwalinska bagged 3 aces . Sakkari won 68% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Chwalinska won 54% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sakkari | Chwalinska |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 9 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 9/15 |
| % Converted | 38% | 60% |
| Conceded | 13 | 15 |
| Saved | 10 | 10 |
| % Saved | 77% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
The Greek broke her opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Greek conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 77% of the break points that she conceded. Chwalinska broke her opponent 9 times with a 60% conversion rate. Chwalinska conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Sakkari | |||
| Q1 Paquet | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 101-89 | 101-89 | |
| Total points | 190 | 190 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 63/97 | 63/97 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 43/63 | 43/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/34 | 16/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Chwalinska | |||
| Q1 Starodubtseva | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-76 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 124-104 | 124-104 | |
| Total points | 228 | 228 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 78/110 | 78/110 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 42/78 | 42/78 | |
| % 1st pts | 54% | 54% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/32 | 20/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 9 | 9 | |
| Converted | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 10/15 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Tennis Scores in Rome
- Jiri BarnatBarnat – Matyas CernyCerny (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Lisa PigatoPigato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alize CornetCornet – Anna BondarBondar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean – Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Arantxa RusRus (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Jil TeichmannTeichmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova – Katie BoulterBoulter (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Olga DanilovicDanilovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Irina-Camelia BeguBegu (6-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Mccartney KesslerKessler (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – Anastasija SevastovaSevastova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Jaqueline CristianCristian (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Suzan LamensLamens – Renata ZarazuaZarazua (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Nuria BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Naomi OsakaOsaka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Ann LiLi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan (2-1) – H2H and prediction