Tristan Schoolkate and Alibek Kachmazov will face off in the semifinal of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Schoolkate who should win in 3 sets.
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.59
Alibek Kachmazov -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Alibek Kachmazov
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Alibek Kachmazov since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-36 | 33-25 | 0-2 | 2-5 | 9-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-33 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 122, Schoolkate got to the semifinal after defeating Ryan Peniston 6-4 4-6 6-4, Sho Shimabukuro 6-2 ret. and Hugo Grenier 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Grenier (6-4 6-4). During the match, Schoolkate scored 70 points vs Grenier’s 59. Tristan was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Schoolkate recorded 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Tristan Schoolkate was very efficient on serve to win 79% (31/39) of his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Tristan broke Grenier 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Schoolkate has surrendered 1 set in this event to win 53% of the points he played.
Schoolkate has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (191-133). 21-12 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Schoolkate has an overall131-91 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Brisbane 1 Challenger where he beat Marek Gengel in the final 7-6(3) 7-6(4).
Schoolkate has a compiled 21-12 win-loss record in 2025, 21-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Alibek Kachmazov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-21 | 10-11 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-28 | 17-13 | 6-6 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 49-31 | 24-14 | 9-6 | 14-10 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 49-21 | 18-11 | 9-5 | 22-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-20 | 6-8 | 3-6 | 27-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 185, Alibek reached the semifinal after defeating Fajing Sun 6-4 7-6(5), Adam Walton 4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 and James McCabe 7-6(5) 6-4.
In the quarter, The Russian had a good straight sets win against McCabe (7-65 6-4). During the match Kachmazov scored 77 points vs McCabe’s 67. Kachmazov was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Kachmazov blasted 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Alibek Kachmazov was extremely efficient on serve to win 74% (25/34) of his 1st serve and 65% (22/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Kachmazov broke McCabe 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kachmazov has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Alibek’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Gwangju Challenger.
The Russian has an aggregate 14-11 win-loss record in 2025, 8-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schoolkate | Kachmazov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 58 | 77 |
| Pts | 204-172 | 277-244 |
| Total Points | 376 | 521 |
| Winners | 88 | 105 |
| %Winners | 43% | 38% |
Both Schoolkate and Kachmazov played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Tristan Schoolkate conceded 1 set, while Alibek Kachmazov conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Schoolkate and Kachmazov have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Schoolkate played 19 games less than Kachmazov. Tristan scored 88 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Russian made 105 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schoolkate | Kachmazov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 30 |
| Avg per match | 6.3 | 10 |
| 1st in | 112/183 | 133/266 |
| %1st in | 61% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 88/112 | 105/133 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 33/71 | 70/133 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 53% |
Schoolkate scored 19 aces (6.3 per match). Kachmazov bagged 30 aces (10 per match). Schoolkate won 79% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Kachmazov won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schoolkate | Kachmazov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 9 |
| Converted | 10/29 | 9/24 |
| % Converted | 34% | 38% |
| Conceded | 18 | 20 |
| Saved | 13 | 14 |
| % Saved | 72% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
Tristan broke his opponents 10 times with a 34% conversion rate. Schoolkate conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 72% of the break points that he conceded. Kachmazov broke his opponents 9 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Russian conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Schoolkate | |||||
| R1 Peniston | R2 Shimabukuro | 1/4 Grenier | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | 6-2 ret. | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 8 | 20 | 58 | |
| pts | 102-95 | 32-18 | 70-59 | 204-172 | |
| Total points | 197 | 50 | 129 | 376 | |
| Winners | 42 | 15 | 31 | 88 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 47% | 44% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 4 | 7 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 1 | 3 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 55/88 | 18/27 | 39/68 | 112/183 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 67% | 57% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 42/55 | 15/18 | 31/39 | 88/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 83% | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/33 | 5/9 | 15/29 | 33/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 56% | 52% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/19 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 10/29 | |
| Converted % | 26% | 40% | 60% | 34% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 0 | 8 | 18 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 0/0 | 7/8 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 60% | – | 88% | 49% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| Kachmazov | |||||
| R1 Sun | R2 Walton | 1/4 McCabe | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-65 | 4-6 7-62 6-2 | 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 31 | 23 | 77 | |
| pts | 87-76 | 113-101 | 77-67 | 277-244 | |
| Total points | 163 | 214 | 144 | 521 | |
| Winners | 34 | 46 | 25 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% | 32% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 13 | 8 | 30 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 7 | 2 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 39/80 | 60/118 | 34/68 | 133/266 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 51% | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 34/39 | 46/60 | 25/34 | 105/133 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 77% | 74% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 28/58 | 22/34 | 70/133 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 48% | 65% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 4/11 | 3/5 | 9/24 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 36% | 60% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 12 | 5 | 20 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 9/12 | 3/5 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 75% | 60% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
Tennis Scores in Guangzhou Challenger
- Brandon HoltHolt – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – James McCabeMcCabe (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Ilia SimakinSimakin (1-6 7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Ji Sung Nam/Takeru YuzukiSung Nam/Takeru Yuzuki – Blake Bayldon/Reese StalderBayldon/Reese Stalder (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – James McCabeMcCabe (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Ilia SimakinSimakin (1-6 7-6(4) 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Brandon HoltHolt (1-4) – H2H and prediction