Terence Atmane and Marat Sharipov will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Terence Atmane who should win in 2 sets.
Terence Atmane -> 1.38
Marat Sharipov -> 2.85
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. Marat Sharipov
There is no head to head record between Terence Atmane and Marat Sharipov since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Terence Atmane
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-31 | 28-17 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-32 | 30-20 | 5-5 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 136, the French player reached the 2nd round after beating Rigele Te 5-7 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round against Te, Terence recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-3 6-1). During the match, Atmane scored 93 points vs Te’s 70. Terence was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Atmane fired 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Terence Atmane was pretty effective on serve to win 83% (34/41) of his 1st serve and 69% (22/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Terence broke Te 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Atmane has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (216-136). 11-10 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Atmane has a composed170-93 record in the last 8 years on hard.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Busan Challenger where he beat Adam Walton in the final 6-3 6-4.
Atmane has an aggregate 12-13 win-loss record in 2025, 11-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Marat Sharipov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 48-26 | 24-11 | 14-9 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-17 | 16-7 | 27-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 65-18 | 43-4 | 22-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-19 | 8-6 | 7-10 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-17 | 2-5 | 3-7 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 256, Marat reached the 2nd round after defeating Mats Rosenkranz 6-3 3-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Marat defeated Rosenkranz (6-3 3-6 6-4). During the match Sharipov scored 87 points vs Rosenkranz’s 81. Marat was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Sharipov scored 14 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Marat Sharipov was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (33/43) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Sharipov broke Rosenkranz 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Sharipov’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger,M25 Doha,the Manama Challenger,M25 Creteil and Balma.
The Russian has an overall 24-9 win-loss record in 2025, 18-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Sharipov has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Atmane | Sharipov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 |
| Pts | 93-70 | 87-81 |
| Total Points | 163 | 168 |
| Winners | 34 | 33 |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% |
Both Atmane and Sharipov played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Terence Atmane conceded 1 set, while Marat Sharipov lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Atmane and Sharipov have played the same amount of sets 3. They also played the same amount of games (28). The French player scored 34 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Marat made 33 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Atmane | Sharipov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 14 |
| 1st in | 41/73 | 43/78 |
| %1st in | 56% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 34/41 | 33/43 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 22/32 | 18/35 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 51% |
Atmane managed to score 11 aces . Sharipov managed to score 14 aces . Atmane won 83% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Sharipov won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Atmane | Sharipov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 29% | 44% |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 50% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 29% conversion rate. The French player surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Sharipov broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Marat conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded.
| Atmane | |||
| R1 Te | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 93-70 | 93-70 | |
| Total points | 163 | 163 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 41/73 | 41/73 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 34/41 | 34/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/32 | 22/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Sharipov | |||
| R1 Rosenkranz | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 87-81 | 87-81 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 14 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 43/78 | 43/78 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 33/43 | 33/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 18/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Guangzhou Challenger
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Li TuTu (6-4 6-78 6-3) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Ye Cong MoCong Mo (6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Alex BoltBolt (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Charles ChenChen (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Marat SharipovSharipov – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Hoyoung RohRoh (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Andre IlaganIlagan (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-3 6-73 6-3) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Jie CuiCui – Yi ZhouZhou (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Fajing SunSun (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Rigele TeTe (5-7 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (7-63 7-62) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Constant LestienneLestienne (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Adam WaltonWalton – Andre IlaganIlagan (6-3 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Fajing SunSun (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-3 6-7(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Alex BoltBolt (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Hoyoung RohRoh (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Charles ChenChen (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Omar JasikaJasika – (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jie CuiCui – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Hugo GrenierGrenier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (1-1) – H2H and prediction