Mats Rosenkranz and Ramkumar Ramanathan will play each other in the qualifications of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mats Rosenkranz who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mats Rosenkranz is the pick to win this match.
Mats Rosenkranz -> 1.41
Ramkumar Ramanathan -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mats Rosenkranz vs. Ramkumar Ramanathan
There is no head to head record between Mats Rosenkranz and Ramkumar Ramanathan since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Mats Rosenkranz
17 - 11win/loss
365
336
LWLWLLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20-15 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2024 | 36-23 | 7-4 | 13-7 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 35-34 | 4-9 | 4-10 | 22-12 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 31-36 | 2-4 | 7-14 | 14-13 | 2-4 | 6-1 |
| 2021 | 42-30 | 1-1 | 20-18 | 15-9 | 5-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 365, Mats got to the qualifications after beating Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Rosenkranz had a good straight sets win against Wei Kang Leong (6-2 6-4). During the match, Rosenkranz scored 62 points vs Wei Kang Leong’s 35. The German was very aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Rosenkranz managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mats Rosenkranz was very effective on serve to win 91% (20/22) of his 1st serve and 80% (16/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Wei Kang Leong 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Rosenkranz has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (296-273). 3-3 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Rosenkranz has a composed 56-68 match record in the last years on hard.
The German’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Oberhaching.
The German has a composed 17-11 win-loss record in 2025, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Ramkumar Ramanathan
4 - 7win/loss
631
111
LWLLWLLLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5-10 | 5-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-26 | 22-23 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-21 | 25-12 | 0-6 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-34 | 4-13 | 4-8 | 2-6 | 4-6 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 45-32 | 23-11 | 8-7 | 5-8 | 7-4 | 2-2 |
Ranked no. 559, Ramanathan reached the qualifications after beating Pengyu Lu 6-0 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Indian had a good straight sets win against Lu (6-0 6-0). During the match Ramanathan scored 48 points vs Lu’s 10. The Indian was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
About the serving games, Ramanathan recorded 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ramkumar Ramanathan was very efficient on serve to win 100% (17/17) of his 1st serve and 70% (7/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ramkumar was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Lu 6 times.
Ramkumar has a compiled 4-7 win-loss record in 2025, 4-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rosenkranz | Ramanathan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 12 |
| Pts | 62-35 | 48-10 |
| Total Points | 97 | 58 |
| Winners | 20 | 17 |
| %Winners | 32% | 35% |
Both Rosenkranz and Ramanathan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Rosenkranz and Ramanathan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Rosenkranz played 6 games more than Ramanathan. Mats scored 20 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Ramkumar bagged 17 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rosenkranz | Ramanathan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 5 |
| 1st in | 22/42 | 17/27 |
| %1st in | 52% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 20/22 | 17/17 |
| %1st pts | 91% | 100% |
| 2nd pts | 16/20 | 7/10 |
| %2nd pts | 80% | 70% |
Rosenkranz made 3 aces . Ramanathan recorded 5 aces . Rosenkranz won 91% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 80% of the points. On the other side, Ramanathan won 100% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rosenkranz | Ramanathan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 6/6 |
| % Converted | 43% | 100% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The German broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Rosenkranz extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Ramanathan broke his opponent 6 times with a 100% conversion rate. Ramkumar was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Rosenkranz | |||
| Q1 Wei Kang Leong |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 62-35 | 62-35 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 22/42 | 22/42 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 20/22 | 20/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/20 | 16/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Ramanathan | |||
| Q1 Lu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 48-10 | 48-10 | |
| Total points | 58 | 58 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 17/27 | 17/27 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 17/17 | 17/17 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 100% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/6 | 6/6 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLWWLL
LWLLWLLLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Ajeet RaiRai (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fajing SunSun – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rigele TeTe – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Ye Cong MoCong Mo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Colin SinclairSinclair (0-0) – H2H and prediction
