Christian Langmo and Ajeet Rai will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christian Langmo who should win in 2 sets.
Christian Langmo -> 1.4
Ajeet Rai -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Christian Langmo vs. Ajeet Rai
This will be the 3rd time that Christian Langmo and Ajeet Rai fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Langmo (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Langmo won 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 in the quarter in M25 Swan Hill back in March 2025.
Christian Langmo
22 - 10win/loss
321
318
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 23-11 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2024 | 41-31 | 33-23 | 7-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 319, Langmo reached the qualifications after beating Yaojie Zeng 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications, Langmo had a good straight sets win against Zeng (7-5 6-2). During the match, Langmo scored 70 points vs Zeng’s 51. Christian was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Langmo managed to score 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Christian Langmo was quite efficient on serve to win 74% (28/38) of his 1st serve and 76% (16/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Zeng 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Langmo has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (243-172). 17-8 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Langmo has an overall201-133 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Langmo’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Timaru.
Langmo has a compiled 22-10 win-loss record in 2025, 17-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
Langmo has never competed in this tournament before.
Ajeet Rai
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 10-9 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2024 | 37-57 | 33-25 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 1-26 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-28 | 19-24 | 4-2 | 1-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-25 | 38-24 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-19 | 22-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 475, the Kiwi got to the qualifications after defeating Zijiang Yang 7-6(2) 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Kiwi had a good straight sets win against Yang (7-62 7-5). During the match Rai scored 82 points vs Yang’s 70. Rai was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Rai bagged 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Ajeet Rai was quite effective on serve to win 79% (31/39) of his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Kiwi broke Yang 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Rai has an overall 10-7 win-loss record in 2025, 7-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Langmo | Rai |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 20 | 25 |
Pts | 70-51 | 82-70 |
Total Points | 121 | 152 |
Winners | 28 | 31 |
%Winners | 40% | 38% |
Both Langmo and Rai played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Langmo and Rai have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Langmo played 5 games less than Rai. Langmo scored 28 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Kiwi fired 31 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Langmo | Rai |
---|---|---|
Aces | 10 | 11 |
Avg per match | 10 | 11 |
1st in | 38/59 | 39/73 |
%1st in | 64% | 53% |
1st pts | 28/38 | 31/39 |
%1st pts | 74% | 79% |
2nd pts | 16/21 | 19/34 |
%2nd pts | 76% | 56% |
Langmo made 10 aces . Rai bagged 11 aces . Langmo won 74% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Rai won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Langmo | Rai |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 3 |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/6 |
% Converted | 43% | 50% |
Conceded | 3 | 6 |
Saved | 3 | 4 |
% Saved | 100% | 67% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Christian had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points. Ajeet broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Ajeet conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Langmo | |||
Q1 Zeng | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 70-51 | 70-51 | |
Total points | 121 | 121 | |
Winners | 28 | 28 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 10 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 38/59 | 38/59 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 16/21 | 16/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Rai | |||
Q1 Yang | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-62 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 82-70 | 82-70 | |
Total points | 152 | 152 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 11 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 39/73 | 39/73 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 31/39 | 31/39 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 19/34 | 19/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Ajeet RaiRai (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fajing SunSun – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rigele TeTe – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Ye Cong MoCong Mo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Colin SinclairSinclair (0-0) – H2H and prediction