Cori Gauff and Belinda Bencic will face off in the 4th round of the Mutua Madrid Open for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on ARANTXA SANCHEZ STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cori Gauff who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cori Gauff is the pick to win this match.
Cori Gauff -> 1.615
Belinda Bencic -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cori Gauff vs. Belinda Bencic
This will be the 5th time that Cori Gauff and Belinda Bencic square off. The head to head is 2-2 for Gauff and Bencic (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Bencic won 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the 4th round in Indian Wells back in March 2025.
Highlights Belinda Bencic vs Cori Gauff – Indian Wells 12-March-2025
Cori Gauff
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 48-16 | 29-9 | 18-3 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 54-18 | 31-10 | 14-5 | 4-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-16 | 40-9 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-23 | 23-16 | 10-4 | 0-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-16 | 16-10 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 4, Cori got to the 4th round after beating Dayana Yastremska 0-6 6-2 7-5 and Ann Li 6-2 6-3.
In the 3rd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Li (6-2 6-3). During the match, Gauff scored 61 points vs Li’s 42. Gauff was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gauff scored just 1 ace during the match and she committed only 4 double faults. Cori Gauff lost the serve twice and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Gauff put 60% of her first serves in, winning 73% (22/30) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Li 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gauff has lost 1 set in this tournament to conquer 55% of the points she played.
Gauff has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 70% of her matches (245-106). 3-1 on clay in 2025. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Gauff has an overall64-27 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
Her best result of the season was conquering the title in Australia where she overcame Iga Swiatek in the final 6-4 6-4.
Gauff has a compiled 16-6 win-loss record in 2025, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Belinda Bencic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-17 | 31-12 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-13 | 24-10 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-18 | 13-9 | 13-4 | 10-2 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-20 | 22-9 | 5-5 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 42, Belinda got to the 4th round after defeating Zeynep Sonmez 6-0 6-2, Clara Tauson 7-5 7-5 and Beatriz Haddad Maia 6-3 4-6 7-6(2).
In the 3rd round, Belinda defeated Haddad Maia (6-3 4-6 7-62). During the match Bencic scored 108 points vs Haddad Maia’s 102. Bencic was very aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Bencic fired 4 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Belinda Bencic lost the serve 6 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Bencic put 72% of her first serves in, winning 64% (47/74) of the points behind her 1st serve and 34% (10/29) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Haddad Maia 7 times after converting 41% of her break points (7/17).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Bencic has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points she played.
Her best result of the current year was winning the title in Abu Dhabi where she overcame Ashlyn Krueger in the final 4-6 6-1 6-1.
Belinda has a composed 21-7 win-loss record in 2025, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Previously, her best result was reaching the semifinal in 2019. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gauff | Bencic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 43 | 70 |
| Pts | 155-128 | 238-198 |
| Total Points | 283 | 436 |
| Winners | 48 | 107 |
| %Winners | 31% | 45% |
Gauff played 2 matches while Bencic competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Cori Gauff lost 1 set, while Belinda Bencic dropped 1 set. Gauff has played 2 set(s) less than Bencic (5 vs 7). Therefore, Gauff played 27 games less than Bencic. The American scored 48 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Bencic made 107 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gauff | Bencic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2.7 |
| 1st in | 69/131 | 159/226 |
| %1st in | 53% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 48/69 | 107/159 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 26/62 | 31/67 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 46% |
Gauff recorded 4 aces (2 per match). Bencic bagged 8 aces (2.7 per match). Gauff won 70% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Bencic won 67% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gauff | Bencic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 16 |
| Converted | 12/23 | 16/27 |
| % Converted | 52% | 59% |
| Conceded | 17 | 23 |
| Saved | 8 | 15 |
| % Saved | 47% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 9 | 8 |
Cori broke her opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Cori lost her serve 9 times and she saved 47% of the break points that she conceded. The Swiss broke her opponents 16 times with a 59% conversion rate. Bencic conceded her serve 8 times and she saved 65% of the break points that she conceded.
| Gauff | ||||
| R2 Yastremska |
R3 Li |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 0-6 6-2 7-5 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 17 | 43 | |
| pts | 94-86 | 61-42 | 155-128 | |
| Total points | 180 | 103 | 283 | |
| Winners | 26 | 22 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 36% | 31% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 39/81 | 30/50 | 69/131 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 60% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 26/39 | 22/30 | 48/69 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 73% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/42 | 10/20 | 26/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 50% | 42% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 7/14 | 5/9 | 12/23 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 56% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 3 | 17 | |
| Saved | 7/14 | 1/3 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 33% | 42% | |
| Times Broken | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
| Bencic | |||||
| R1 Sonmez |
R2 Tauson |
R3 Haddad Maia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | 7-5 7-5 | 6-3 4-6 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 24 | 32 | 70 | |
| pts | 55-29 | 75-67 | 108-102 | 238-198 | |
| Total points | 84 | 142 | 210 | 436 | |
| Winners | 21 | 39 | 47 | 107 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 52% | 44% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 30/44 | 55/79 | 74/103 | 159/226 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 70% | 72% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 21/30 | 39/55 | 47/74 | 107/159 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 71% | 64% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 13/24 | 10/29 | 31/67 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 54% | 34% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 7 | 16 | |
| Converted | 6/7 | 3/3 | 7/17 | 16/27 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 100% | 41% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 13 | 23 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 6/7 | 7/13 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 86% | 54% | 104% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWWWLW
WWWWWWLWWL Tennis Scores in Madrid
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Jessica PegulaPegula (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (6-0 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Rebeka MasarovaMasarova (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Elise MertensMertens (3-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Sofia KeninKenin (3-6 6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Donna VekicVekic – Emma NavarroNavarro (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Cori GauffGauff – Ann LiLi (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Mirra AndreevaAndreeva – Magdalena FrechFrech (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Diana ShnaiderShnaider – Anastasija SevastovaSevastova (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Linda NoskovaNoskova (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Yuliia StarodubtsevaStarodubtseva – Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova (2-6 7-62 6-0) – See score progression
- Madison KeysKeys – Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya (7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Belinda BencicBencic – Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia (6-3 4-6 7-62) – See score progression
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Elise MertensMertens (3-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Rebeka MasarovaMasarova (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (6-0 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Sofia KeninKenin (3-6 6-4 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Jessica PegulaPegula (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Darya KasatkinaKasatkina (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Elena RybakinaRybakina – Elina SvitolinaSvitolina (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Peyton StearnsStearns (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Belinda BencicBencic – Cori GauffGauff (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Madison KeysKeys – Donna VekicVekic (3-1) – H2H and prediction
