Matteo Gigante and Kimmer Coppejans will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Rome Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kimmer Coppejans who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kimmer Coppejans is the pick to win this match.
Kimmer Coppejans -> 1.66
Matteo Gigante -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Matteo Gigante vs. Kimmer Coppejans
This will be the 2nd time that Matteo Gigante and Kimmer Coppejans clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Coppejans (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Coppejans won 5-7 6-3 6-3 in the 1st round in the Parma Challenger back in 2020.
Matteo Gigante
10 - 9win/loss
164
132
LWWWWWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 13-10 | 7-4 | 6-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-25 | 27-10 | 11-10 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-29 | 10-5 | 19-18 | 1-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-20 | 9-1 | 27-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-15 | 2-2 | 16-7 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 195, the Italian got to the 2nd round after defeating Lorenzo Giustino 3-6 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round against Giustino, Gigante recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-1 6-2). During the match, Gigante scored 88 points vs Giustino’s 68. Matteo was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gigante bagged 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Matteo Gigante was quite efficient on serve to win 73% (37/51) of his 1st serve and 53% (16/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Matteo broke Giustino 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Gigante has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (151-110). 2-2 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Gigante has a composed83-60 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Matteo has a composed 9-9 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome Challenger
Kimmer Coppejans
23 - 10win/loss
275
97
LLWWWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-11 | 14-6 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-8 | 22-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 280, Kimmer reached the 2nd round after beating Tiago Pereira 1-6 6-2 6-3, Norbert Gombos 3-6 6-4 6-1 and Dominic Stricker 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Stricker (6-2 6-2). During the match Coppejans scored 68 points vs Stricker’s 44. Coppejans was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Coppejans blasted 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Kimmer Coppejans was pretty efficient on serve to win 72% (21/29) of his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Belgian broke Stricker 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Kimmer’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger and the Murcia Challenger.
The Belgian has an overall 23-9 win-loss record in 2025, 9-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gigante | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 66 |
| Pts | 88-68 | 237-193 |
| Total Points | 156 | 430 |
| Winners | 37 | 78 |
| %Winners | 42% | 33% |
Gigante played 1 match while Coppejans competed in 3 matches. Coppejans started his run from the qualifications while Gigante had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Matteo Gigante lost 1 set, while Kimmer Coppejans surrendered 2 sets. Gigante has played 5 set(s) less than Coppejans (3 vs 8). Therefore, Gigante played 42 games less than Coppejans. Gigante scored 37 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Belgian made 78 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gigante | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 51/81 | 113/194 |
| %1st in | 63% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 37/51 | 78/113 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 16/30 | 50/81 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 62% |
Gigante fired 5 aces . Coppejans bagged 12 aces (4 per match). Gigante won 73% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gigante | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 13 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 13/29 |
| % Converted | 71% | 45% |
| Conceded | 5 | 16 |
| Saved | 3 | 10 |
| % Saved | 60% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
Matteo broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Gigante surrendered his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Belgian broke his opponents 13 times with a 45% conversion rate. Kimmer conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gigante | |||
| R1 Giustino |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 88-68 | 88-68 | |
| Total points | 156 | 156 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 51/81 | 51/81 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 37/51 | 37/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/30 | 16/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Coppejans | |||||
| Q1 Pereira |
Q3 Gombos |
R1 Stricker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 26 | 16 | 66 | |
| pts | 86-78 | 83-71 | 68-44 | 237-193 | |
| Total points | 164 | 154 | 112 | 430 | |
| Winners | 26 | 31 | 21 | 78 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 37% | 31% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 6 | 2 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 42/70 | 42/73 | 29/51 | 113/194 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 58% | 57% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 26/42 | 31/42 | 21/29 | 78/113 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 74% | 72% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 21/31 | 13/22 | 50/81 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 68% | 59% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 3/6 | 5/10 | 13/29 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 50% | 50% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 2 | 4 | 16 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 1/2 | 3/4 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 50% | 75% | 185% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLLWL
LLWWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Rome Challenger
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas PokornyPokorny – Nick HardtHardt (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (3-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Lorenzo CarboniCarboni – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Mika BrunoldBrunold (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Remy BertolaBertola – Arthur BouquierBouquier (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Sandro KoppKopp – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Paul JubbJubb (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Jacopo VasamiVasami (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Gabriele PennafortiPennaforti (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (5-7 7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Henri SquireSquire (7-5 2-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – Hady HabibHabib (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
