Vilius Gaubas and Oleg Prihodko will fight against each other in the 2^nd round of the Rome Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:30 am on COURT 3 BANCA DEL FUCINO. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Vilius Gaubas who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Vilius Gaubas is the pick to win this match.
Vilius Gaubas -> 1.32
Oleg Prihodko -> 3.14

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Vilius Gaubas vs. Oleg Prihodko

There is no head to head record between Vilius Gaubas and Oleg Prihodko since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.

Vilius Gaubas

Ranked no. 149, the Lithuanian got to the 2^nd round after beating Khumoun Sultanov 3-6 6-4 6-2.

In the 1^st round against Sultanov, Vilius recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-2). During the match, Gaubas scored 95 points vs Sultanov’s 82. The Lithuanian was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.

Regarding the service games, Gaubas managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Vilius Gaubas was extremely efficient on serve to win 71% (37/52) of his 1st serve and 57% (17/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Gaubas broke Sultanov 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).

Gaubas has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (140-94). 8-3 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gaubas has a composed120-68 match record in the last 5 years on clay.

His best result of the current season was winning the title the Menorca Challenger where he defeated Pol Martin Tiffon in the final 6-0 6-4.

The Lithuanian has a composed 11-10 win-loss record in 2025, 8-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Rome Challenger

Oleg Prihodko

Ranked no. 345, Oleg reached the 2^nd round after defeating Tomasz Berkieta 7-6(2) 6-2, Samuel Vincent Ruggeri 7-5 6-1 and Oriol Roca Batalla 5-7 7-6(6) 6-3.

In the 1^st round against Roca Batalla, The Ukrainian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-6⁶ 6-3). During the match Prihodko scored 131 points vs Roca Batalla’s 129. Oleg was exceptionally aggressive to blast 50 winners.

About the serving games, Prihodko blasted 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Oleg Prihodko lost the serve 3 times and he saved 14 break points. Furthermore, Prihodko put 54% of his first serves in, winning 69% (50/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (34/62) on the 2nd serve. Prihodko broke Roca Batalla 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).

The Ukrainian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Nussloch.

The Ukrainian has a composed 10-11 win-loss record in 2025, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Rome Challenger

Oleg has never competed in this tournament before.

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Gaubas	Prihodko
Match played	1	3
Tot Set	3	7
Tot Games	27	74
Pts	95-82	279-241
Total Points	177	520
Winners	37	108
%Winners	39%	39%

Gaubas played 1 match while Prihodko competed in 3 matches. Prihodko started his run from the qualifications while Gaubas had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Vilius Gaubas dropped 1 set, while Oleg Prihodko lost 1 set. Gaubas has played 4 set(s) less than Prihodko (3 vs 7). Therefore, Gaubas played 47 games less than Prihodko. Vilius scored 37 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Oleg fired 108 winners (39%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Gaubas	Prihodko
Aces	5	13
Avg per match	5	4.3
1st in	52/82	146/247
%1st in	63%	59%
1st pts	37/52	108/146
%1st pts	71%	74%
2nd pts	17/30	61/101
%2nd pts	57%	60%

Gaubas recorded 5 aces . Prihodko blasted 13 aces (4.3 per match). Gaubas won 71% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Prihodko won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Gaubas	Prihodko
Won	4	9
Converted	4/8	9/25
% Converted	50%	36%
Conceded	4	21
Saved	1	18
% Saved	25%	86%
Times Broken	3	3

The Lithuanian broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Gaubas dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. Prihodko broke his opponents 9 times with a 36% conversion rate. Prihodko conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.

Gaubas
	R1 Sultanov	Total
Score	3-6 6-4 6-2
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	27	27
pts	95-82	95-82
Total points	177	177
Winners	37	37
%Winners	39%	39%
SERVE
Aces	5	5
Double Faults	1	1
1st in	52/82	52/82
% 1st in	63%	63%
1st pts	37/52	37/52
% 1st pts	71%	71%
2nd pts	17/30	17/30
% 2nd pts	57%	57%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/8	4/8
Converted %	50%	50%
Conceded	4	4
Saved	1/4	1
Saved %	25%	25%
Times Broken	3	3

Prihodko
	Q1 Berkieta	Q3 Vincent	R1 Roca Batalla	Total
Score	7-62 6-2	7-5 6-1	5-7 7-66 6-3
Tot Set	2	2	3	7
Tot Games	21	19	34	74
pts	72-59	76-53	131-129	279-241
Total points	131	129	260	520
Winners	32	26	50	108
%Winners	44%	34%	38%	39%
SERVE
Aces	1	6	6	13
Double Faults	3	1	5	9
1st in	40/66	34/47	72/134	146/247
% 1st in	61%	72%	54%	59%
1st pts	32/40	26/34	50/72	108/146
% 1st pts	80%	76%	69%	74%
2nd pts	16/26	11/13	34/62	61/101
% 2nd pts	62%	85%	55%	60%
Breaks
Won	2	4	3	9
Converted	2/6	4/9	3/10	9/25
Converted %	33%	44%	30%	36%
Conceded	4	0	17	21
Saved	4/4	0/0	14/17	18
Saved %	100%	–	82%	182%
Times Broken	0	0	3	3

Tennis Scores in Rome Challenger

• Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Paul JubbJubb (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Lukas PokornyPokorny – Nick HardtHardt (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
• Lorenzo CarboniCarboni – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
• Vilius GaubasGaubas – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Jacopo VasamiVasami (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Gabriele PennafortiPennaforti (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
• Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (5-7 7-6⁶ 6-3) – See score progression
• Matteo GiganteGigante – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (3-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
• Sandro KoppKopp – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Remy BertolaBertola – Arthur BouquierBouquier (7-6⁵ 6-1) – See score progression
• Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Hady HabibHabib – Mika BrunoldBrunold (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
• Timofey SkatovSkatov – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (7-6¹ 6-4) – See score progression
• Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
• Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Henri SquireSquire (7-5 2-6 7-6³) – See score progression
• Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (5-7 7-6(6) 6-3) – See score progression
• Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Jacopo VasamiVasami (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Gabriele PennafortiPennaforti (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
• Hady HabibHabib – Mika BrunoldBrunold (6-4 7-5) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Sandro KoppKopp – Hady HabibHabib (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Timofey SkatovSkatov – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction