Vilius Gaubas and Oleg Prihodko will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Rome Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:30 am on COURT 3 BANCA DEL FUCINO. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Vilius Gaubas who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Vilius Gaubas is the pick to win this match.
Vilius Gaubas -> 1.32
Oleg Prihodko -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Vilius Gaubas vs. Oleg Prihodko
There is no head to head record between Vilius Gaubas and Oleg Prihodko since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Vilius Gaubas
11 - 10win/loss
149
144
LWLWWWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-12 | 1-3 | 12-5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 48-35 | 7-4 | 40-28 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-26 | 3-3 | 55-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-17 | 4-4 | 15-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 149, the Lithuanian got to the 2nd round after beating Khumoun Sultanov 3-6 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round against Sultanov, Vilius recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-2). During the match, Gaubas scored 95 points vs Sultanov’s 82. The Lithuanian was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gaubas managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Vilius Gaubas was extremely efficient on serve to win 71% (37/52) of his 1st serve and 57% (17/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Gaubas broke Sultanov 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Gaubas has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (140-94). 8-3 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gaubas has a composed120-68 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Menorca Challenger where he defeated Pol Martin Tiffon in the final 6-0 6-4.
The Lithuanian has a composed 11-10 win-loss record in 2025, 8-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome Challenger
Oleg Prihodko
10 - 11win/loss
345
309
LLWWWLLLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-13 | 0-3 | 3-3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2024 | 64-17 | 8-4 | 44-9 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 8-4 | 18-21 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-32 | 2-3 | 43-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-33 | 4-3 | 39-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 345, Oleg reached the 2nd round after defeating Tomasz Berkieta 7-6(2) 6-2, Samuel Vincent Ruggeri 7-5 6-1 and Oriol Roca Batalla 5-7 7-6(6) 6-3.
In the 1st round against Roca Batalla, The Ukrainian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-66 6-3). During the match Prihodko scored 131 points vs Roca Batalla’s 129. Oleg was exceptionally aggressive to blast 50 winners.
About the serving games, Prihodko blasted 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Oleg Prihodko lost the serve 3 times and he saved 14 break points. Furthermore, Prihodko put 54% of his first serves in, winning 69% (50/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (34/62) on the 2nd serve. Prihodko broke Roca Batalla 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
The Ukrainian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Nussloch.
The Ukrainian has a composed 10-11 win-loss record in 2025, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome Challenger
Oleg has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gaubas | Prihodko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 74 |
| Pts | 95-82 | 279-241 |
| Total Points | 177 | 520 |
| Winners | 37 | 108 |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% |
Gaubas played 1 match while Prihodko competed in 3 matches. Prihodko started his run from the qualifications while Gaubas had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Vilius Gaubas dropped 1 set, while Oleg Prihodko lost 1 set. Gaubas has played 4 set(s) less than Prihodko (3 vs 7). Therefore, Gaubas played 47 games less than Prihodko. Vilius scored 37 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Oleg fired 108 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gaubas | Prihodko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 52/82 | 146/247 |
| %1st in | 63% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 37/52 | 108/146 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 17/30 | 61/101 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 60% |
Gaubas recorded 5 aces . Prihodko blasted 13 aces (4.3 per match). Gaubas won 71% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Prihodko won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gaubas | Prihodko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 9 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 9/25 |
| % Converted | 50% | 36% |
| Conceded | 4 | 21 |
| Saved | 1 | 18 |
| % Saved | 25% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
The Lithuanian broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Gaubas dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. Prihodko broke his opponents 9 times with a 36% conversion rate. Prihodko conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gaubas | |||
| R1 Sultanov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 95-82 | 95-82 | |
| Total points | 177 | 177 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 52/82 | 52/82 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 37/52 | 37/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/30 | 17/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Prihodko | |||||
| Q1 Berkieta |
Q3 Vincent |
R1 Roca Batalla |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-2 | 7-5 6-1 | 5-7 7-66 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 19 | 34 | 74 | |
| pts | 72-59 | 76-53 | 131-129 | 279-241 | |
| Total points | 131 | 129 | 260 | 520 | |
| Winners | 32 | 26 | 50 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 34% | 38% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 6 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 40/66 | 34/47 | 72/134 | 146/247 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 72% | 54% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 32/40 | 26/34 | 50/72 | 108/146 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 76% | 69% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 11/13 | 34/62 | 61/101 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 85% | 55% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 4/9 | 3/10 | 9/25 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 44% | 30% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 | 17 | 21 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 0/0 | 14/17 | 18 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 82% | 182% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWWLWW
LLWWWLLLLL Tennis Scores in Rome Challenger
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Paul JubbJubb (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Lukas PokornyPokorny – Nick HardtHardt (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Lorenzo CarboniCarboni – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Jacopo VasamiVasami (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Gabriele PennafortiPennaforti (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (5-7 7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (3-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Sandro KoppKopp – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Remy BertolaBertola – Arthur BouquierBouquier (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Mika BrunoldBrunold (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Henri SquireSquire (7-5 2-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (5-7 7-6(6) 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Jacopo VasamiVasami (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Gabriele PennafortiPennaforti (6-3 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Mika BrunoldBrunold (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – Hady HabibHabib (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
