Jerome Kym and Borna Gojo will play each other in the qualifications of the Mutua Madrid Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 6. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Borna Gojo who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Borna Gojo is the pick to win this match.
Borna Gojo -> 1.4
Jerome Kym -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jerome Kym vs. Borna Gojo
There is no head to head record between Jerome Kym and Borna Gojo since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jerome Kym
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 59-20 | 14-4 | 37-11 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 133, the Swiss got to the qualifications after defeating Mackenzie Mcdonald 4-6 0-2 ret..
In the qualifications against Mcdonald, Kym had a free pass after Mcdonald retired on a 4-6 0-2 . scoreline.
Kym has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 67% of his matches (134-66). 1-1 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kym has an overall72-35 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Swiss has an overall 3-5 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Kym has never competed in this tournament before.
Borna Gojo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11-9 | 2-3 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 10-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-25 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-28 | 19-9 | 5-5 | 14-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-22 | 8-7 | 3-6 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 353, Gojo got to the qualifications after defeating Marton Fucsovics 2-6 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications against Fucsovics, The Croatian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Gojo scored 78 points vs Fucsovics’s 72. Gojo was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Gojo bagged 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Borna Gojo lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Gojo put 64% of his first serves in, winning 78% (40/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (12/29) on the 2nd serve. The Croatian broke Fucsovics 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
The Croatian has an aggregate 7-7 win-loss record in 2025, 5-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kym | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 12 | 25 |
| Pts | 39-50 | 78-72 |
| Total Points | 89 | 150 |
| Winners | 19 | 40 |
| %Winners | 49% | 51% |
Both Kym and Gojo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Jerome Kym surrendered 2 sets, while Borna Gojo lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Kym and Gojo have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Kym played 13 games less than Gojo. Jerome scored 19 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Gojo struck 40 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kym | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 8 |
| 1st in | 26/43 | 51/80 |
| %1st in | 60% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 40/51 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 5/17 | 12/29 |
| %2nd pts | 29% | 41% |
Kym bagged 4 aces . Gojo made 8 aces . Kym won 73% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 29% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kym | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 3 |
| Converted | 0/1 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 0% | 60% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Jerome hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Kym surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Croatian broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Borna conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kym | |||
| Q1 Mcdonald |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 0-2 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 39-50 | 39-50 | |
| Total points | 89 | 89 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 26/43 | 26/43 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 19/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/17 | 5/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 29% | 29% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/1 | 0/1 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Gojo | |||
| Q1 Fucsovics |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 78-72 | 78-72 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 51/80 | 51/80 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 40/51 | 40/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/29 | 12/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLWLL
LWWWLWWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Christian GarinGarin (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Kei NishikoriNishikori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Marin CilicCilic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (5-3) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Valentin RoyerRoyer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Flavio CobolliCobolli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Hugo DellienDellien (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Borna CoricCoric (1-0) – H2H and prediction
