Marat Sharipov and Andre Ilagan will play each other in the qualifications of the Gwangju Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on SHOW COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marat Sharipov who should win in 3 sets.
Marat Sharipov -> 1.51
Andre Ilagan -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Marat Sharipov vs. Andre Ilagan
This will be the 2nd time that Marat Sharipov and Andre Ilagan clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Sharipov (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Sharipov won 6-3 6-4 in the qualifications in the Busan Challenger back in April 2025.
Marat Sharipov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 48-26 | 24-11 | 14-9 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-17 | 16-7 | 27-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 65-18 | 43-4 | 22-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-19 | 8-6 | 7-10 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-17 | 2-5 | 3-7 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 260, the Russian got to the qualifications after beating Hayden Jones 6-1 6-7(6) 6-3.
In the qualifications, Sharipov defeated Jones (6-1 6-76 6-3). During the match, Sharipov scored 98 points vs Jones’s 73. Marat was pretty aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sharipov scored 16 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Marat Sharipov was quite efficient on serve to win 80% (41/51) of his 1st serve and 51% (20/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Marat broke Jones 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Sharipov has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 67% of his matches (164-79). 16-5 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sharipov has a composed85-27 record in the last 6 years on hard.
Marat’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger,M25 Doha,the Manama Challenger,M25 Creteil and Balma.
The Russian has a compiled 22-8 win-loss record in 2025, 16-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
The Russian has never competed in this tournament before.
Andre Ilagan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-33 | 30-27 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-29 | 41-22 | 0-0 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-6 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-7 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 384, Ilagan got to the qualifications after defeating Christian Langmo 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Andre had a good straight sets win against Langmo (6-4 6-4). During the match Ilagan scored 78 points vs Langmo’s 69. The American was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilagan recorded 5 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Andre Ilagan lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Ilagan put 65% of his first serves in, winning 74% (34/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (10/25) on the 2nd serve. Ilagan broke Langmo 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Andre has an overall 12-10 win-loss record in 2025, 12-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sharipov | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 20 |
| Pts | 98-73 | 78-69 |
| Total Points | 171 | 147 |
| Winners | 41 | 34 |
| %Winners | 42% | 44% |
Both Sharipov and Ilagan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Marat Sharipov lost 1 set while Andre Ilagan hasn’t conceded a set so far. Sharipov has played 1 set more than Ilagan (3 vs 2). Therefore, Sharipov played 9 games more than Ilagan. Sharipov scored 41 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 34 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sharipov | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 16 | 5 |
| 1st in | 51/90 | 46/71 |
| %1st in | 57% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 41/51 | 34/46 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 20/39 | 10/25 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 40% |
Sharipov blasted 16 aces . Ilagan blasted 5 aces . Sharipov won 80% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Ilagan won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sharipov | Ilagan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 50% | 44% |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
The Russian broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Marat lost his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Andre broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sharipov | |||
| Q1 Jones | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-76 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 98-73 | 98-73 | |
| Total points | 171 | 171 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 16 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 51/90 | 51/90 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 41/51 | 41/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/39 | 20/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Ilagan | |||
| Q1 Langmo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 78-69 | 78-69 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 46/71 | 46/71 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 34/46 | 34/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/25 | 10/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yan BaiBai – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Hyeon ChungChung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Uisung ParkPark – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-0) – H2H and prediction