Emilio Nava and Chris Rodesch will face off in the final of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 12:00 pm on STADIUM COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.25
Chris Rodesch -> 3.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Chris Rodesch
This will be the 2nd time that Emilio Nava and Chris Rodesch fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Nava (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Nava won 6-4 6-4 in the 1st round in the Sarasota Challenger back in April 2025.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31-11 | 0-2 | 31-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 140, the American reached the final after defeating Christian Sigsgaard 6-4 6-4, Tung-Lin Wu 6-4 6-4, Murphy Cassone 6-2 6-3 and Mathys Erhard 6-2 6-4.
In the semifinal, Nava had a good straight sets win against Erhard (6-2 6-4). During the match, Nava scored 56 points vs Erhard’s 40. Nava was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nava bagged 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Emilio Nava was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (23/29) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Emilio was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Erhard 4 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nava hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Nava has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (218-143). 31-7 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Nava has a composed100-44 record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Asuncion Challenger where he defeated Thiago Moura Monteiro in the final 7-5 6-3 and the Concepcion Challenger where he defeated Nicolas Kicker in the final 6-1 7-6(3) and the Sarasota Challenger where he defeated Liam Draxl in the final 6-2 7-6(2).
The American has a compiled 31-9 win-loss record in 2025, 31-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Nava has never competed in this tournament before.
Chris Rodesch
21 - 9win/loss
178
177
LWWWWWLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-10 | 10-4 | 5-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 45-11 | 19-2 | 18-4 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-11 | 5-1 | 12-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239, Rodesch reached the final after beating Juan Carlos Prado Angelo 6-4 6-1, Dmitry Popko 6-3 7-6(5), Andres Andrade 6-4 7-5 and Andrea Collarini 6-2 1-6 6-4.
In the semifinal, Chris defeated Collarini (6-2 1-6 6-4). During the match Rodesch scored 83 points vs Collarini’s 81. Rodesch was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Rodesch fired 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Chris Rodesch lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Rodesch put 63% of his first serves in, winning 74% (37/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 34% (10/29) on the 2nd serve. The Luxembourger broke Collarini 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Rodesch has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Chris’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Loule.
The Luxembourger has an aggregate 20-9 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Rodesch |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 75 | 86 |
| Pts | 261-203 | 305-262 |
| Total Points | 464 | 567 |
| Winners | 100 | 125 |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% |
Both Nava and Rodesch played 4 matches. At the moment, Chris Rodesch surrendered 1 set while Emilio Nava hasn’t lost a set so far. Nava has played 1 set(s) less than Rodesch (8 vs 9). Therefore, Nava played 11 games less than Rodesch. Emilio scored 100 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Rodesch struck 125 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Rodesch |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 27 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 6.8 | 3 |
| 1st in | 132/217 | 162/254 |
| %1st in | 61% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 100/132 | 125/162 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 49/85 | 44/92 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 48% |
Nava fired 27 aces (6.8 per match). Rodesch blasted 12 aces (3 per match). Nava won 76% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Rodesch won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Rodesch |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 15 | 15 |
| Converted | 15/29 | 15/37 |
| % Converted | 52% | 41% |
| Conceded | 8 | 22 |
| Saved | 4 | 14 |
| % Saved | 50% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 8 |
Nava broke his opponents 15 times with a 52% conversion rate. Emilio surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Luxembourger broke his opponents 15 times with a 41% conversion rate. Rodesch conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | ||||||
| R1 Sigsgaard |
R2 Wu |
1/4 Cassone |
1/2 Erhard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | 17 | 18 | 75 | |
| pts | 74-60 | 69-56 | 62-47 | 56-40 | 261-203 | |
| Total points | 134 | 125 | 109 | 96 | 464 | |
| Winners | 29 | 28 | 20 | 23 | 100 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% | 32% | 41% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 12 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 36/55 | 35/59 | 32/55 | 29/48 | 132/217 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 59% | 58% | 60% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 29/36 | 28/35 | 20/32 | 23/29 | 100/132 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 80% | 63% | 79% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 13/24 | 13/23 | 11/19 | 49/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 54% | 57% | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 3/9 | 6/8 | 4/4 | 15/29 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 33% | 75% | 100% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/1 | 4/6 | 0/1 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | 67% | 0% | 17% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
| Rodesch | ||||||
| R1 Carlos Prado Angelo |
R2 Popko |
1/4 Andrade |
1/2 Collarini |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-3 7-65 | 6-4 7-5 | 6-2 1-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 22 | 22 | 25 | 86 | |
| pts | 61-39 | 78-70 | 83-72 | 83-81 | 305-262 | |
| Total points | 100 | 148 | 155 | 164 | 567 | |
| Winners | 28 | 30 | 30 | 37 | 125 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 38% | 36% | 45% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 30/50 | 42/63 | 40/62 | 50/79 | 162/254 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 67% | 65% | 63% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 28/30 | 30/42 | 30/40 | 37/50 | 125/162 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 71% | 75% | 74% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/20 | 11/21 | 15/22 | 10/29 | 44/92 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 52% | 68% | 34% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/8 | 3/11 | 4/11 | 15/37 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 50% | 27% | 36% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 22 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 5/9 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 60% | 80% | 56% | 66% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWWWWW
LWWWWWLLWW Tennis Scores in Tallahassee Challenger
- Liam Draxl/Cleeve HarperDraxl/Cleeve Harper – James Cerretani/George GoldhoffCerretani/George Goldhoff (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio NavaNava – Chris RodeschRodesch (1-0) – H2H and prediction
