Daniil Glinka and Maximus Jones will clash against each other in the quarter of the Abidjan 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:00 pm on CENTRAL KAYDAN. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Glinka who should win in 3 sets.
Daniil Glinka -> 1.53
Maximus Jones -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniil Glinka vs. Maximus Jones
There is no head to head record between Daniil Glinka and Maximus Jones since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Daniil Glinka
19 - 6win/loss
393
390
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 24-10 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 422, the Estonian reached the quarter after beating Benoit Paire 6-4 5-7 6-4 and Taha Baadi 7-5 7-6(1).
In the 2nd round, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Baadi (7-5 7-61). During the match, Glinka scored 93 points vs Baadi’s 82. Glinka was very aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Glinka blasted 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Daniil Glinka was quite efficient on serve to win 72% (42/58) of his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Glinka broke Baadi twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Estonian has lost 1 set in this tournament to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Glinka has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 55% of his matches (195-160). 2-0 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Glinka has a compiled87-81 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Daniil’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Trento and M25 Trimbach.
Daniil has an aggregate 19-6 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Abidjan 1 Challenger
Daniil has never competed in this tournament before.
Maximus Jones
16 - 9win/loss
419
419
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 22-12 | 16-8 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 21-26 | 21-22 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 28-20 | 27-19 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 43-46 | 35-36 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 618, the Thai reached the quarter after defeating Kwami Stanislas Dussey 6-1 6-0, S D Prajwal Dev 7-6(3) 7-6(6), Kris Van Wyk 7-5 2-6 7-6(4) and Clement Chidekh 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The Thai had a good straight sets win against Chidekh (6-3 6-2). During the match Jones scored 61 points vs Chidekh’s 41. Jones was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Jones managed to score 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Maximus Jones was very effective on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Maximus broke Chidekh 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Thai started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
The Thai’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Brazzaville Challenger.
The Thai has an overall 16-9 win-loss record in 2025, 10-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Glinka | Jones |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 5 | 9 |
Tot Games | 57 | 89 |
Pts | 195-179 | 303-247 |
Total Points | 374 | 550 |
Winners | 82 | 140 |
%Winners | 42% | 46% |
Glinka played 2 matches while Jones competed in 4 matches. Jones started his run from the qualifications while Glinka had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Daniil Glinka lost 1 set, while Maximus Jones surrendered 1 set. Glinka has played 4 set(s) less than Jones (5 vs 9). Therefore, Glinka played 32 games less than Jones. Glinka scored 82 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Thai scored 140 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Glinka | Jones |
---|---|---|
Aces | 13 | 26 |
Avg per match | 6.5 | 6.5 |
1st in | 115/212 | 181/281 |
%1st in | 54% | 64% |
1st pts | 82/115 | 140/181 |
%1st pts | 71% | 77% |
2nd pts | 51/97 | 57/100 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 57% |
Glinka scored 13 aces (6.5 per match). Jones bagged 26 aces (6.5 per match). Glinka won 71% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Jones won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Glinka | Jones |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 11 |
Converted | 7/10 | 11/21 |
% Converted | 70% | 52% |
Conceded | 26 | 17 |
Saved | 21 | 13 |
% Saved | 81% | 76% |
Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
The Estonian broke his opponents 7 times with a 70% conversion rate. Glinka lost his serve 5 times and he saved 81% of the break points that he conceded. Maximus broke his opponents 11 times with a 52% conversion rate. The Thai conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
Glinka | ||||
R1 Paire | R2 Baadi | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | 7-5 7-61 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 25 | 57 | |
pts | 102-97 | 93-82 | 195-179 | |
Total points | 199 | 175 | 374 | |
Winners | 40 | 42 | 82 | |
%Winners | 39% | 45% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 7 | 6 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
1st in | 57/121 | 58/91 | 115/212 | |
% 1st in | 47% | 64% | 54% | |
1st pts | 40/57 | 42/58 | 82/115 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 72% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 32/64 | 19/33 | 51/97 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 58% | 53% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 2/4 | 7/10 | |
Converted % | 83% | 50% | 70% | |
Conceded | 18 | 8 | 26 | |
Saved | 14/18 | 7/8 | 21 | |
Saved % | 78% | 88% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 5 |
Jones | ||||||
Q1 Stanislas | Q3 D Prajwal Dev | R1 Van | R2 Chidekh | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-0 | 7-63 7-66 | 7-5 2-6 7-64 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 13 | 26 | 33 | 17 | 89 | |
pts | 55-20 | 84-78 | 103-108 | 61-41 | 303-247 | |
Total points | 75 | 162 | 211 | 102 | 550 | |
Winners | 18 | 43 | 51 | 28 | 140 | |
%Winners | 33% | 51% | 50% | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 2 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 26 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |
1st in | 22/37 | 52/85 | 72/107 | 35/52 | 181/281 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 61% | 67% | 67% | 64% | |
1st pts | 18/22 | 43/52 | 51/72 | 28/35 | 140/181 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 83% | 71% | 80% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 11/15 | 18/33 | 18/35 | 10/17 | 57/100 | |
% 2nd pts | 73% | 55% | 51% | 59% | 57% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 1/3 | 2/6 | 3/4 | 11/21 | |
Converted % | 63% | 33% | 33% | 75% | 52% | |
Conceded | 2 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 17 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 3/4 | 7/10 | 1/1 | 13 | |
Saved % | 100% | 75% | 70% | 100% | 173% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
Tennis Scores in Abidjan 1 Challenger
- Anthony Genov/Tom HandsGenov/Tom Hands – Robin Bertrand/Eliakim CoulibalyBertrand/Eliakim Coulibaly (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Florent BaxBax (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tibo ColsonColson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction