Linda Noskova and Suzan Lamens will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Open Capfinances Rouen Metropole for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:30 am on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Linda Noskova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Linda Noskova is the pick to win this match.
Linda Noskova -> 1.5
Suzan Lamens -> 2.59
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Linda Noskova vs. Suzan Lamens
There is no head to head record between Linda Noskova and Suzan Lamens since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Linda Noskova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 13-12 | 9-8 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-18 | 19-8 | 6-6 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-20 | 22-10 | 6-5 | 5-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-17 | 10-5 | 14-5 | 16-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-11 | 13-7 | 10-4 | 15-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 33, Linda reached the 2nd round after beating Bernarda Pera 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
In the 1st round against Pera, Noskova recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-65 6-4).During the match, Noskova scored less points (1) than Pera. In fact, the world no. 33 won 105 points vs Pera’s. That means that Noskova was more focused during the important points. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 54 winners.
Regarding the service games, Noskova scored 9 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Linda Noskova lost the serve 4 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Noskova put 65% of her first serves in, winning 71% (54/76) of the points behind her 1st serve and 34% (14/41) on the 2nd serve. Noskova broke Pera 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Noskova has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 66% of her matches (158-83). 1-0 on clay in 2025. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Noskova has a compiled37-24 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Czech’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Abu Dhabi.
Linda has a composed 11-9 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rouen
Noskova has never competed in this tournament before.
Suzan Lamens
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-12 | 8-7 | 6-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-27 | 15-11 | 19-10 | 11-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-31 | 7-7 | 33-19 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-27 | 13-9 | 24-11 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 48-27 | 21-9 | 22-14 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 69, Suzan got to the 2nd round after defeating Bianca Vanessa Andreescu 6-1 4-6 7-6(2).
In the 1st round, Lamens defeated Andreescu (6-1 4-6 7-62). During the match Lamens scored 108 points vs Andreescu’s 95. Suzan was extremely aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Lamens blasted 2 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Suzan Lamens was extremely effective on serve to win 71% (39/55) of her 1st serve and 56% (22/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. Lamens broke Andreescu 4 times after converting 36% of her break points (4/11).
The Dutch has an aggregate 13-9 win-loss record in 2025, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Noskova | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 30 |
| Pts | 105-106 | 108-95 |
| Total Points | 211 | 203 |
| Winners | 54 | 39 |
| %Winners | 51% | 36% |
Both Noskova and Lamens played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Linda Noskova dropped 1 set, while Suzan Lamens dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Noskova and Lamens have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Noskova played 3 games more than Lamens. Linda scored 54 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch scored 39 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Noskova | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 2 |
| 1st in | 76/117 | 55/94 |
| %1st in | 65% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 54/76 | 39/55 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 14/41 | 22/39 |
| %2nd pts | 34% | 56% |
Noskova made 9 aces . Lamens managed to score 2 aces . Noskova won 71% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 34% of the points. On the other side, Lamens won 71% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Noskova | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 57% | 36% |
| Conceded | 11 | 5 |
| Saved | 7 | 3 |
| % Saved | 64% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Linda broke her opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Linda surrendered her serve 4 times and she saved 64% of the break points that she conceded. Lamens broke her opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Suzan conceded her serve twice and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded.
| Noskova | |||
| R1 Pera |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 105-106 | 105-106 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 54 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 76/117 | 76/117 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 54/76 | 54/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/41 | 14/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 34% | 34% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Lamens | |||
| R1 Andreescu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 4-6 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 108-95 | 108-95 | |
| Total points | 203 | 203 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 55/94 | 55/94 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 39/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/39 | 22/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWLWLL
LWLLWWWWWL Tennis Scores in Rouen
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – Fiona FerroFerro (7-64 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Camilla RosatelloRosatello (6-0 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nik RazborsekRazborsek – Frane NincevicNincevic (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Marko MiladinovicMiladinovic (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Marko TepavacTepavac (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alen Rogic HadzalicRogic Hadzalic – Domagoj BiljeskoBiljesko (3-6 7-611 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joao Pedro SorgiPedro Sorgi – Antun VidakVidak (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nerman FaticFatic – Nicolo TurchettiTurchetti (4-6 7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Martins PodzusPodzus – Aldin SetkicSetkic (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Jordan Correia Passos Do CarmoCorreia Passos Do Carmo (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Suzan LamensLamens – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
