Miguel Tobon and Patrick Zahraj will play each other in the 2nd round of the San Luis Potosi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on ESTADIO. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Zahraj who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Zahraj is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Zahraj -> 1.21
Miguel Tobon -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Miguel Tobon vs. Patrick Zahraj
There is no head to head record between Miguel Tobon and Patrick Zahraj since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Miguel Tobon
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6-7 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 5-6 | 3-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the Colombian got to the 2nd round after defeating Elmar Ejupovic 6-1 3-6 7-6(2), Isaiah Strode 6-0 5-0 ret. and Aidan Mayo 7-5 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Colombian had a good straight sets win against Mayo (7-5 6-1). During the match, Tobon scored 73 points vs Mayo’s 58. Tobon was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tobon bagged 2 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Miguel Tobon lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Tobon put 56% of his first serves in, winning 71% (30/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (15/33) on the 2nd serve. The Colombian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Mayo 5 times.
Tobon has a negative win-loss record in the last 2 years having won 45% of his matches (10-12). 4-4 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tobon has a compiled6-8 win-loss record in the last 2 years on clay.
Miguel has a composed 5-6 win-loss record in 2025, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Luis Potosi Challenger
The Colombian has never competed in this tournament before.
Patrick Zahraj
19 - 12win/loss
276
272
LWLLWLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-31 | 9-5 | 17-15 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 28-16 | 4-3 | 15-10 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 276, Zahraj got to the 2nd round after defeating Alvin Nicholas Tudorica 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Nicholas Tudorica (6-3 6-1). During the match Zahraj scored 69 points vs Nicholas Tudorica’s 50. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Zahraj struck 2 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Patrick Zahraj lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Zahraj put 56% of his first serves in, winning 74% (25/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (10/27) on the 2nd serve. Patrick broke Nicholas Tudorica 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
The German’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Pau Challenger.
Patrick has an overall 19-11 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tobon | Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 59 | 16 |
| Pts | 216-161 | 69-50 |
| Total Points | 377 | 119 |
| Winners | 80 | 25 |
| %Winners | 37% | 36% |
Tobon played 3 matches while Zahraj competed in 1 match. Tobon started his run from the qualifications while Zahraj had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Miguel Tobon surrendered 1 set while Patrick Zahraj hasn’t conceded a set so far. Tobon has played 6 sets more than Zahraj (8 vs 2). Therefore, Tobon played 43 games more than Zahraj. The Colombian scored 80 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Patrick bagged 25 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tobon | Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1.7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 104/204 | 34/61 |
| %1st in | 51% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 80/104 | 25/34 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 54/100 | 10/27 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 37% |
Tobon struck 5 aces (1.7 per match). Zahraj bagged 2 aces . Tobon won 77% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Zahraj won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tobon | Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 6 |
| Converted | 13/21 | 6/13 |
| % Converted | 62% | 46% |
| Conceded | 13 | 9 |
| Saved | 9 | 7 |
| % Saved | 69% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
The Colombian broke his opponents 13 times with a 62% conversion rate. Tobon dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tobon | |||||
| Q1 Ejupovic |
Q3 Strode |
R1 Mayo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 3-6 7-62 | 6-0 5-0 ret. | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 11 | 19 | 59 | |
| pts | 92-78 | 51-25 | 73-58 | 216-161 | |
| Total points | 170 | 76 | 131 | 377 | |
| Winners | 37 | 13 | 30 | 80 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 25% | 41% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 7 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 44/88 | 18/41 | 42/75 | 104/204 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 44% | 56% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 37/44 | 13/18 | 30/42 | 80/104 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 72% | 71% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/44 | 14/23 | 15/33 | 54/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 61% | 45% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 5/8 | 5/5 | 13/21 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 63% | 100% | 62% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 | 8 | 13 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 2/2 | 6/8 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 100% | 75% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
| Zahraj | |||||
| R1 Nicholas |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |||
| pts | 69-50 | 69-50 | |||
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |||
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |||
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |||
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |||
| 1st in | 34/61 | 34/61 | |||
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |||
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 25/34 | |||
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |||
| 2nd pts | 10/27 | 10/27 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |||
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |||
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |||
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |||
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |||
| Saved % | 78% | 26% | |||
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |||
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLLLLW
LWLLWLWWWL Tennis Scores in San Luis Potosi Challenger
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Tristan MccormickMccormick (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Dan MartinMartin – Felix CorwinCorwin (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Miguel TobonTobon – Aidan MayoMayo (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Luka PavlovicPavlovic (6-72 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – James WattWatt (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Juan Alejandro HernandezAlejandro Hernandez (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Max WiskandtWiskandt – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (2-6 6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Rodrigo AlujasAlujas – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Kiranpal PannuPannu (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Rafael De AlbaDe Alba (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Mateus AlvesAlves – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Tom ParisParis – Maxime CressyCressy (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Alvin Nicholas TudoricaNicholas Tudorica (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-74 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Tristan MccormickMccormick (6-4 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – James WattWatt (6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Kiranpal PannuPannu (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Dan MartinMartin – Felix CorwinCorwin (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Miguel TobonTobon – Aidan MayoMayo (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Juan Alejandro HernandezAlejandro Hernandez (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Luka PavlovicPavlovic (6-7(2) 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Rodrigo AlujasAlujas – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (7-6(5) 6-2) – See score progression
- Max WiskandtWiskandt – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (2-6 6-2 7-6(3)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto CidCid – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Matias SotoSoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
