Tom Paris and Dan Martin will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the San Luis Potosi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:30 pm on ESTADIO. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tom Paris who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tom Paris is the pick to win this match.
Tom Paris -> 1.48
Dan Martin -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tom Paris vs. Dan Martin
There is no head to head record between Tom Paris and Dan Martin since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Tom Paris
18 - 10win/loss
411
411
LWLLWLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 18-10 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2024 | 19-10 | 12-5 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 5-7 | 10-4 | 18-10 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2022 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 434 (career-high), Paris got to the 2nd round after beating Maxime Cressy 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Cressy (6-3 6-4). During the match, Paris scored 66 points vs Cressy’s 52. Tom was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Paris managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Tom Paris was quite effective on serve to win 76% (25/33) of his 1st serve and 69% (18/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tom broke Cressy twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Paris has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 62% of his matches (82-50). 2-2 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Paris has an aggregate12-8 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
Paris’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Oslo and M25 Nussloch.
Paris has a composed 18-9 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Luis Potosi Challenger
Paris has never competed in this tournament before.
Dan Martin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-11 | 8-7 | 7-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-32 | 14-15 | 9-11 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-13 | 0-7 | 5-1 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-7 | 14-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 740 (career-high), the Canadian reached the 2nd round after beating Benjamin Thomas George 6-2 7-6(12), Vladyslav Orlov 6-1 4-6 6-0 and Felix Corwin 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Dan had a good straight sets win against Corwin (6-1 6-4). During the match Martin scored 65 points vs Corwin’s 49. Martin was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Martin made 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Dan Martin was pretty efficient on serve to win 71% (29/41) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Martin broke Corwin 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Dan has a compiled 14-10 win-loss record in 2025, 5-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Paris | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 61 |
| Pts | 66-52 | 224-175 |
| Total Points | 118 | 399 |
| Winners | 25 | 83 |
| %Winners | 38% | 37% |
Paris played 1 match while Martin competed in 3 matches. Martin started his run from the qualifications while Paris had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Dan Martin dropped 1 set while Tom Paris hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Paris has played 5 set(s) less than Martin (2 vs 7). Therefore, Paris played 42 games less than Martin. Tom scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Dan managed to score 83 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Paris | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 3.3 |
| 1st in | 33/59 | 120/213 |
| %1st in | 56% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 25/33 | 83/120 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 18/26 | 49/93 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 53% |
Paris blasted 6 aces . Martin managed to score 10 aces (3.3 per match). Paris won 76% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Martin won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Paris | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 16 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 16/26 |
| % Converted | 33% | 62% |
| Conceded | 0 | 22 |
| Saved | 0 | 15 |
| % Saved | 0% | 68% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 7 |
Paris broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Tom had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Martin broke his opponents 16 times with a 62% conversion rate. Martin conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
| Paris | |||
| R1 Cressy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 66-52 | 66-52 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/59 | 33/59 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 25/33 | 25/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/26 | 18/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Martin | |||||
| Q1 Thomas |
Q3 Orlov |
R1 Corwin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-612 | 6-1 4-6 6-0 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 23 | 17 | 61 | |
| pts | 81-67 | 78-59 | 65-49 | 224-175 | |
| Total points | 148 | 137 | 114 | 399 | |
| Winners | 26 | 28 | 29 | 83 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 36% | 45% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 5 | 4 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 41/71 | 38/77 | 41/65 | 120/213 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 49% | 63% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 26/41 | 28/38 | 29/41 | 83/120 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 74% | 71% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 21/39 | 13/24 | 49/93 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 54% | 54% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 4 | 16 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/8 | 4/6 | 16/26 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 75% | 67% | 62% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 7 | 5 | 22 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 5/7 | 4/5 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 71% | 80% | 211% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLWWLL
LWWWWWLWLL Tennis Scores in San Luis Potosi Challenger
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Juan Alejandro HernandezAlejandro Hernandez (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Max WiskandtWiskandt – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (2-6 6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Rodrigo AlujasAlujas – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Kiranpal PannuPannu (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Rafael De AlbaDe Alba (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Tristan MccormickMccormick (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Dan MartinMartin – Felix CorwinCorwin (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Miguel TobonTobon – Aidan MayoMayo (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – James WattWatt (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Alvin Nicholas TudoricaNicholas Tudorica (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-74 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Mateus AlvesAlves – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Tom ParisParis – Maxime CressyCressy (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Tristan MccormickMccormick (6-4 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – James WattWatt (6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Kiranpal PannuPannu (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Dan MartinMartin – Felix CorwinCorwin (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Miguel TobonTobon – Aidan MayoMayo (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Juan Alejandro HernandezAlejandro Hernandez (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Luka PavlovicPavlovic (6-7(2) 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Rodrigo AlujasAlujas – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (7-6(5) 6-2) – See score progression
- Max WiskandtWiskandt – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (2-6 6-2 7-6(3)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto CidCid – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Matias SotoSoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
