
Mitchell Krueger and Geoffrey Blancaneaux will face off in the 2nd round of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on STADIUM COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mitchell Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.55
Geoffrey Blancaneaux -> 2.33
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Geoffrey Blancaneaux
There is no head to head record between Mitchell Krueger and Geoffrey Blancaneaux since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Mitchell Krueger


10 - 10win/loss
150
135

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 10-12 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 42-31 | 30-17 | 9-7 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 141, Mitchell reached the 2nd round after beating Facundo Mena 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Mitchell had a good straight sets win against Mena (6-3 6-4). During the match, Krueger scored 82 points vs Mena’s 67. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Krueger scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Mitchell Krueger lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 58% of his first serves in, winning 67% (26/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the 2nd serve. Mitchell broke Mena 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Krueger has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (273-265). 4-2 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Krueger has a composed 46-51 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The American has an overall 9-10 win-loss record in 2025, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Geoffrey Blancaneaux


12 - 13win/loss
276
134

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 12-13 | 0-3 | 10-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 24-33 | 6-5 | 13-19 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-37 | 7-10 | 14-18 | 8-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-38 | 17-10 | 14-15 | 8-10 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 26-31 | 8-6 | 17-19 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 285, the French player got to the 2nd round after defeating Filip Cristian Jianu 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Geoffrey had a good straight sets win against Cristian Jianu (6-4 6-4). During the match Blancaneaux scored 68 points vs Cristian Jianu’s 59. The French player was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Blancaneaux recorded 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Geoffrey Blancaneaux lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Blancaneaux put 61% of his first serves in, winning 67% (26/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Cristian Jianu 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Brazzaville Challenger where he beat Calvin Hemery in the final 6-3 6-4.
The French player has a composed 12-12 win-loss record in 2025, 10-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Krueger | Blancaneaux |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 20 |
Pts | 82-67 | 68-59 |
Total Points | 149 | 127 |
Winners | 26 | 26 |
%Winners | 32% | 38% |
Both Krueger and Blancaneaux played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Krueger and Blancaneaux have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Krueger played 1 game less than Blancaneaux. Krueger scored 26 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Blancaneaux recorded 26 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Krueger | Blancaneaux |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 2 |
Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
1st in | 39/67 | 39/64 |
%1st in | 58% | 61% |
1st pts | 26/39 | 26/39 |
%1st pts | 67% | 67% |
2nd pts | 16/28 | 14/25 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 56% |
Krueger managed to score 1 ace . Blancaneaux also managed to score 2 aces . Krueger won 67% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Blancaneaux won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Krueger | Blancaneaux |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 4 |
Converted | 5/11 | 4/7 |
% Converted | 45% | 57% |
Conceded | 9 | 5 |
Saved | 7 | 3 |
% Saved | 78% | 60% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Krueger broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Mitchell lost his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Geoffrey broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Blancaneaux conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
Krueger | |||
R1 Mena |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 82-67 | 82-67 | |
Total points | 149 | 149 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 32% | 32% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 39/67 | 39/67 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 16/28 | 16/28 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Blancaneaux | |||
R1 Cristian |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 68-59 | 68-59 | |
Total points | 127 | 127 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 39/64 | 39/64 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 14/25 | 14/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Tallahassee Challenger
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Juan Carlos Prado AngeloCarlos Prado Angelo (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Christian SigsgaardSigsgaard (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre (6-4 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannes Ingildsen/David StevensonIngildsen/David Stevenson – Joshua Charlton/Patrick HarperCharlton/Patrick Harper (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (6-4 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Karl PolingPoling (6-2 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Facundo MenaMena (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Chris Rodesch/Tung-Lin WuRodesch/Tung-Lin Wu – Geoffrey Blancaneaux/Mathys ErhardBlancaneaux/Mathys Erhard (6-3 4-6 10-3) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Christian SigsgaardSigsgaard (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Karl PolingPoling (6-2 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre (6-4 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (6-4 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Chris RodeschRodesch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Andrea CollariniCollarini (0-0) – H2H and prediction