Felix Corwin and Dan Martin will square off in the 1st round of the San Luis Potosi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 4:30 pm on GRANDSTAND. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Felix Corwin who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Felix Corwin is the pick to win this match.
Felix Corwin -> 1.52
Dan Martin -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Felix Corwin vs. Dan Martin
There is no head to head record between Felix Corwin and Dan Martin since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Felix Corwin
12 - 11win/loss
683
478
LWWWLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-26 | 4-7 | 23-15 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-23 | 10-7 | 17-11 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-13 | 8-3 | 15-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-14 | 9-5 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-30 | 24-20 | 2-3 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 520, Corwin reached the 1st round after defeating Guillermo Tunas 6-2 6-4 and Rafael De Alba 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Corwin has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (235-157). 10-6 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Corwin has a composed 66-43 record in the last years on clay.
Corwin’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Naples.
Felix has an overall 12-10 win-loss record in 2025, 10-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Luis Potosi Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Dan Martin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-32 | 10-14 | 11-9 | 12-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-32 | 14-15 | 9-11 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-13 | 0-7 | 5-1 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-7 | 14-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 740 (career-high), Dan got to the 1st round after defeating Benjamin Thomas George 6-2 7-6(12) and Vladyslav Orlov 6-1 4-6 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Canadian defeated Orlov (6-1 4-6 6-0). During the match Martin scored 78 points vs Orlov’s 59. Dan was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Martin recorded 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Dan Martin was exceptionally effective on serve to win 74% (28/38) of his 1st serve and 54% (21/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Canadian broke Orlov 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Martin started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
The Canadian has an aggregate 13-10 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Corwin | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 44 |
| Pts | 61-48 | 159-126 |
| Total Points | 109 | 285 |
| Winners | 25 | 54 |
| %Winners | 41% | 34% |
Corwin played 1 match while Martin competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Dan Martin surrendered 1 set while Felix Corwin hasn’t conceded a set so far. Corwin has played 3 set(s) less than Martin (2 vs 5). Therefore, Corwin played 26 games less than Martin. Felix scored 25 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Canadian made 54 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Corwin | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 32/54 | 79/148 |
| %1st in | 59% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | 54/79 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 11/22 | 36/69 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 52% |
Corwin managed to score 4 aces . Martin struck 6 aces (3 per match). Corwin won 78% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Martin won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Corwin | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 12/20 |
| % Converted | 50% | 60% |
| Conceded | 3 | 17 |
| Saved | 2 | 11 |
| % Saved | 67% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Felix dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Dan broke his opponents 12 times with a 60% conversion rate. Martin conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.
| Corwin | ||||
| Q1 Tunas |
Q3 De |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 27 | 45 | |
| pts | 61-48 | – | 61-48 | |
| Total points | 109 | 0 | 109 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | ||
| %Winners | 41% | 0% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | 32/54 | / | 32/54 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 0% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 25/32 | / | 25/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 0% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/22 | / | 11/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | ||
| Converted | 4/8 | / | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | ||
| Saved | 2/3 | 0/ | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | ||
| Martin | ||||
| Q1 Thomas |
Q3 Orlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-612 | 6-1 4-6 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 23 | 44 | |
| pts | 81-67 | 78-59 | 159-126 | |
| Total points | 148 | 137 | 285 | |
| Winners | 26 | 28 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 36% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 41/71 | 38/77 | 79/148 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 49% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 26/41 | 28/38 | 54/79 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 74% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 21/39 | 36/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 54% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 12 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/8 | 12/20 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 75% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 7 | 17 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 5/7 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 71% | 66% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWW
LLWWLWLWLL Tennis Scores in San Luis Potosi Challenger
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Rafael De AlbaDe Alba (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Miguel TobonTobon – Aidan MayoMayo (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Matias SotoSoto – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-3 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Alvin Nicholas TudoricaNicholas Tudorica (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tom ParisParis – Maxime CressyCressy (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-74 6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mateus AlvesAlves – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (7-65 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roberto Cid SuberviRoberto – Cannon KingsleyCannon (6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Rodrigo AlujasRodrigo – Neil OberleitnerNeil (7-6(5) 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Tristan MccormickMccormick (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Juan Hernandez SerranoHernandez Serrano (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Felix CorwinCorwin – Dan MartinMartin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Matias SotoSoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Roberto CidCid (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kiranpal PannuPannu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
