James Watt and Mark Whitehouse will play each other in the qualifications of the San Luis Potosi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 2:30 pm on GRANDSTAND. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mark Whitehouse who should win in 3 sets.
Mark Whitehouse -> 1.57
James Watt -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head James Watt vs. Mark Whitehouse
There is no head to head record between James Watt and Mark Whitehouse since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
James Watt
4 - 6win/loss
722
713
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 7-11 | 3-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2024 | 32-21 | 22-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 10-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 6-12 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 787, Watt got to the qualifications after beating Jesse Flores 6-1 7-6(5).
In the qualifications, James had a good straight sets win against Flores (6-1 7-65). During the match, Watt scored 67 points vs Flores’s 52. The Kiwi was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Watt bagged 7 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, James Watt was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 90% (27/30) of his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Watt broke Flores 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Watt has a winning record in the last 4 years having won 52% of his matches (45-41). 1-0 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Watt has a compiled1-0 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
James has a composed 3-6 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Luis Potosi Challenger
Watt has never competed in this tournament before.
Mark Whitehouse
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 4-4 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 18-17 | 8-7 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2023 | 13-26 | 7-14 | 0-2 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-1 |
2022 | 34-33 | 25-21 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 7-6 | 0-0 |
2021 | 12-18 | 7-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 894, Mark got to the qualifications after defeating Kosuke Ogura 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Mark had a good straight sets win against Ogura (6-2 6-2). During the match Whitehouse scored 71 points vs Ogura’s 49. Mark was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Whitehouse made 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Mark Whitehouse lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Whitehouse put 63% of his first serves in, winning 69% (24/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. Mark broke Ogura 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Mark has a composed 1-1 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Watt | Whitehouse |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 20 | 16 |
Pts | 67-52 | 71-49 |
Total Points | 119 | 120 |
Winners | 27 | 24 |
%Winners | 40% | 34% |
Both Watt and Whitehouse played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Watt and Whitehouse have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Watt played 4 games more than Whitehouse. James scored 27 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Whitehouse scored 24 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Watt | Whitehouse |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 4 |
Avg per match | 7 | 4 |
1st in | 30/57 | 35/56 |
%1st in | 53% | 63% |
1st pts | 27/30 | 24/35 |
%1st pts | 90% | 69% |
2nd pts | 15/27 | 9/21 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 43% |
Watt struck 7 aces . Whitehouse fired 4 aces . Watt won 90% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Whitehouse won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Watt | Whitehouse |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 6 |
Converted | 3/9 | 6/11 |
% Converted | 33% | 55% |
Conceded | 1 | 4 |
Saved | 0 | 2 |
% Saved | 0% | 50% |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
James broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Watt surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Mark broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Watt | |||
Q1 Flores | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 67-52 | 67-52 | |
Total points | 119 | 119 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 30/57 | 30/57 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 27/30 | 27/30 | |
% 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Whitehouse | |||
Q1 Ogura | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 71-49 | 71-49 | |
Total points | 120 | 120 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 35/56 | 35/56 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 24/35 | 24/35 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Juan Hernandez SerranoHernandez Serrano (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – Dan MartinMartin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felix CorwinCorwin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Alvin Nicholas TudoricaNicholas Tudorica (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Matias SotoSoto (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan MccormickMccormick – Juan Sebastian OsorioSebastian Osorio (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kiranpal PannuPannu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction