Learner Tien and Botic Van De Zandschulp will square off in the qualifications of the BMW Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.

See updated oddsAs per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.68
Learner Tien -> 2.09

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Learner Tien vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp

There is no head to head record between Learner Tien and Botic Van De Zandschulp since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.

Learner Tien

Learner Tien

12 - 7win/loss

Hard
11-6
I Hard
0-0
Clay
1-1
Rank
69
High
66
LWWLLLLWWW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 13-8 11-6 2-2 0-0 0-0 0-0
2024 63-14 53-8 0-1 10-5 0-0 0-0
2023 30-10 20-10 0-0 10-0 0-0 0-0
2022 12-11 8-5 3-3 1-3 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 69, Tien reached the qualifications after beating Henri Squire 7-5 2-6 6-0.

In the qualifications, Tien defeated Squire (7-5 2-6 6-0). During the match, Tien scored 81 points vs Squire’s 69. Tien was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.

Talking about the service games, Tien recorded 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Learner Tien lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Tien put 54% of his first serves in, winning 75% (30/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (17/34) on the 2nd serve. Learner broke Squire 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).

Tien has a fantastic record in the last 4 years having won 74% of his matches (117-42). 1-1 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tien has an overall4-5 record in the last 4 years on clay.

Tien has an aggregate 12-7 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in Munich

Learner has never competed in this tournament before.

Munich
Tien's Record

Botic Van De Zandschulp

Botic Van De Zandschulp

8 - 10win/loss

Hard
7-6
I Hard
0-3
Clay
1-1
Rank
89
High
22
WLWLLWWLWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 9-11 7-6 2-2 0-3 0-0 0-0
2024 33-33 9-11 16-12 7-8 1-2 0-0
2023 27-25 10-9 4-6 12-7 1-3 0-0
2022 38-29 14-11 11-7 7-7 6-4 0-0
2021 53-23 17-5 24-10 9-5 3-3 0-0

Ranked no. 88, Botic reached the qualifications after defeating Max Hans Rehberg 6-3 6-1.

In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Hans Rehberg (6-3 6-1). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 56 points vs Hans Rehberg’s 35. Botic was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.

Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp was very effective on serve to win 84% (21/25) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Dutch broke Hans Rehberg 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).

The Dutch has an aggregate 8-10 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in Munich

Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2022 and 2023. See his history.

Munich
Van De Zandschulp's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament

L.Tien
B.Van Zandschulp
1h:42
1h:42
Time on court​
1h:09
1h:09
1h:42
1h:42
Last match​
1h:09
1h:09
1
1
Match played
1
1
26
26
Games Played​
16
16
3
3
Set played​​
2
2
81
81
Total points​
56
56
81
81
Avg point​
56
56
30
30
Winners
21
21
30
30
Avg Winners​
21
21
37%
37%
Ratio winners
38%
38%
-- Serve --
3
3
Aces
3
3
3
3
Avg Aces
3
3
4
4
Double Faults
2
2
4
4
Avg Double Faults
2
2
30/40
30/40
1st won total​
21/25
21/25
!
75%
75%
1st won %
!
84%
84%
17/34
17/34
2nd won total​
13/20
13/20
50%
50%
2nd won %
!
65%
65%
-- Break Points --
6/8
6/8
BP won
4/5
4/5
6/8
6/8
Avg BP won
4/5
4/5
!
75%
75%
Won
!
80%
80%
7
7
Conceded
1
1
7
7
Avg Conceded
1
1
4
4
Broken
0
0
4
4
Avg Broken
!
0
0
3
3
Saved
1
1

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Tien Van De Zandschulp
Match played 1 1
Tot Set 3 2
Tot Games 26 16
Pts 81-69 56-35
Total Points 150 91
Winners 30 21
%Winners 37% 38%

Both Tien and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Learner Tien dropped 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t lost a set so far. Tien has played 1 set more than Van De Zandschulp (3 vs 2). Therefore, Tien played 10 games more than Van De Zandschulp. The American scored 30 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Van De Zandschulp recorded 21 winners (38%).

Serve Performance

Serve Tien Van De Zandschulp
Aces 3 3
Avg per match 3 3
1st in 40/74 25/45
%1st in 54% 56%
1st pts 30/40 21/25
%1st pts 75% 84%
2nd pts 17/34 13/20
%2nd pts 50% 65%

Tien blasted 3 aces . Van De Zandschulp scored 3 aces . Tien won 75% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Tien Van De Zandschulp
Won 6 4
Converted 6/8 4/5
% Converted 75% 80%
Conceded 7 1
Saved 3 1
% Saved 43% 100%
Times Broken 4 0

The American broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Tien conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Botic was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.

Tien
Q1
Squire
Total
Score 7-5 2-6 6-0
Tot Set 3 3
Tot Games 26 26
pts 81-69 81-69
Total points 150 150
Winners 30 30
%Winners 37% 37%
SERVE
Aces 3 3
Double Faults 4 4
1st in 40/74 40/74
% 1st in 54% 54%
1st pts 30/40 30/40
% 1st pts 75% 75%
2nd pts 17/34 17/34
% 2nd pts 50% 50%
Breaks
Won 6 6
Converted 6/8 6/8
Converted % 75% 75%
Conceded 7 7
Saved 3/7 3
Saved % 43% 43%
Times Broken 4 4
Van De Zandschulp
Q1
Hans Rehberg
Total
Score 6-3 6-1
Tot Set 2 2
Tot Games 16 16
pts 56-35 56-35
Total points 91 91
Winners 21 21
%Winners 38% 38%
SERVE
Aces 3 3
Double Faults 2 2
1st in 25/45 25/45
% 1st in 56% 56%
1st pts 21/25 21/25
% 1st pts 84% 84%
2nd pts 13/20 13/20
% 2nd pts 65% 65%
Breaks
Won 4 4
Converted 4/5 4/5
Converted % 80% 80%
Conceded 1 1
Saved 1/1 1
Saved % 100% 100%
Times Broken 0 0

Upcoming matches in the draw