Learner Tien and Botic Van De Zandschulp will square off in the qualifications of the BMW Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.68
Learner Tien -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Learner Tien vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
There is no head to head record between Learner Tien and Botic Van De Zandschulp since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Learner Tien
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 13-8 | 11-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 63-14 | 53-8 | 0-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-10 | 20-10 | 0-0 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 8-5 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 69, Tien reached the qualifications after beating Henri Squire 7-5 2-6 6-0.
In the qualifications, Tien defeated Squire (7-5 2-6 6-0). During the match, Tien scored 81 points vs Squire’s 69. Tien was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tien recorded 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Learner Tien lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Tien put 54% of his first serves in, winning 75% (30/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (17/34) on the 2nd serve. Learner broke Squire 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Tien has a fantastic record in the last 4 years having won 74% of his matches (117-42). 1-1 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tien has an overall4-5 record in the last 4 years on clay.
Tien has an aggregate 12-7 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Munich
Learner has never competed in this tournament before.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
8 - 10win/loss
89
22
LWLWLLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9-12 | 7-6 | 2-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 88, Botic reached the qualifications after defeating Max Hans Rehberg 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Hans Rehberg (6-3 6-1). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 56 points vs Hans Rehberg’s 35. Botic was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp was very effective on serve to win 84% (21/25) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Dutch broke Hans Rehberg 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
The Dutch has an aggregate 8-10 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Munich
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2022 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tien | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 16 |
| Pts | 81-69 | 56-35 |
| Total Points | 150 | 91 |
| Winners | 30 | 21 |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% |
Both Tien and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Learner Tien dropped 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t lost a set so far. Tien has played 1 set more than Van De Zandschulp (3 vs 2). Therefore, Tien played 10 games more than Van De Zandschulp. The American scored 30 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Van De Zandschulp recorded 21 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tien | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 40/74 | 25/45 |
| %1st in | 54% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 21/25 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 17/34 | 13/20 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 65% |
Tien blasted 3 aces . Van De Zandschulp scored 3 aces . Tien won 75% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tien | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/8 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 75% | 80% |
| Conceded | 7 | 1 |
| Saved | 3 | 1 |
| % Saved | 43% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Tien conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Botic was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Tien | |||
| Q1 Squire |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 2-6 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 81-69 | 81-69 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/74 | 40/74 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 30/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/34 | 17/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| Q1 Hans Rehberg |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 56-35 | 56-35 | |
| Total points | 91 | 91 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 25/45 | 25/45 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 21/25 | 21/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLLWWW
LWLWLLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Alexandre MullerMuller (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Marcos GironGiron (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Nicolas JarryJarry (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Billy HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (0-0) – H2H and prediction
