
Emilio Nava and Gabi Adrian Boitan will face off in the 2nd round of the Sarasota Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 3:00 pm on NICK BOLLETTIERI COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.25
Gabi Adrian Boitan -> 3.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Gabi Adrian Boitan
This will be the 2nd time that Emilio Nava and Gabi Adrian Boitan clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Nava (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they played, Nava won 7-6(4) 6-1 in the 1st round in the Cleveland Challenger back in 2024.
Emilio Nava
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 31-10 | 0-2 | 31-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 169, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Chris Rodesch 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Emilio had a good straight sets win against Rodesch (6-4 6-4). During the match, Nava scored 65 points vs Rodesch’s 52. Emilio was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nava blasted 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Emilio Nava was extremely efficient on serve to win 79% (26/33) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Emilio broke Rodesch 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Nava has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (210-143). 23-7 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nava has a compiled92-44 record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Asuncion Challenger where he defeated Thiago Moura Monteiro in the final 7-5 6-3 and the Concepcion Challenger where he defeated Nicolas Kicker in the final 6-1 7-6(3).
Nava has an aggregate 23-9 win-loss record in 2025, 23-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sarasota Challenger
Emilio has never competed in this tournament before.
Gabi Adrian Boitan


18 - 8win/loss
352
328

Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 19-10 | 10-6 | 8-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 54-29 | 2-4 | 49-22 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 45-20 | 2-2 | 36-10 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 9-10 | 7-7 | 0-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 17-7 | 12-4 | 4-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 370, Gabi reached the 2nd round after beating Strong Kirchheimer 6-3 6-2, Blaise Bicknell 6-4 3-6 6-1 and Tyler Zink 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Adrian had a good straight sets win against Zink (6-4 7-5). During the match Adrian scored 71 points vs Zink’s 64. Gabi was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Adrian scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Gabi Adrian Boitan lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Adrian put 69% of his first serves in, winning 70% (33/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. Gabi broke Zink 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
The Romanian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Quinta do Lago and M15 Alaminos.
Adrian has a compiled 18-8 win-loss record in 2025, 7-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sarasota Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Nava | Adrian |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
Tot Games | 20 | 65 |
Pts | 65-52 | 218-181 |
Total Points | 117 | 399 |
Winners | 26 | 85 |
%Winners | 40% | 39% |
Nava played 1 match while Adrian competed in 3 matches. Adrian started his run from the qualifications while Nava had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Gabi Adrian Boitan lost 1 set while Emilio Nava hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Nava has played 5 set(s) less than Adrian (2 vs 7). Therefore, Nava played 45 games less than Adrian. Emilio scored 26 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Gabi blasted 85 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Nava | Adrian |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 6 |
Avg per match | 9 | 2 |
1st in | 33/57 | 119/192 |
%1st in | 58% | 62% |
1st pts | 26/33 | 85/119 |
%1st pts | 79% | 71% |
2nd pts | 14/24 | 43/73 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 59% |
Nava bagged 9 aces . Adrian struck 6 aces (2 per match). Nava won 79% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Adrian won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Nava | Adrian |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 12 |
Converted | 3/4 | 12/32 |
% Converted | 75% | 38% |
Conceded | 1 | 14 |
Saved | 0 | 10 |
% Saved | 0% | 71% |
Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Nava broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Romanian broke his opponents 12 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Romanian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
Nava | |||
R1 Rodesch |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 65-52 | 65-52 | |
Total points | 117 | 117 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 33/57 | 33/57 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 26/33 | 26/33 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Adrian | |||||
Q1 Kirchheimer |
Q3 Bicknell |
R1 Zink |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 22 | 65 | |
pts | 64-45 | 83-72 | 71-64 | 218-181 | |
Total points | 109 | 155 | 135 | 399 | |
Winners | 24 | 28 | 33 | 85 | |
%Winners | 38% | 34% | 46% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 7 | 3 | 15 | |
1st in | 31/51 | 41/73 | 47/68 | 119/192 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 56% | 69% | 62% | |
1st pts | 24/31 | 28/41 | 33/47 | 85/119 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 68% | 70% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 13/20 | 21/32 | 9/21 | 43/73 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 66% | 43% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 4/11 | 4/11 | 12/32 | |
Converted % | 40% | 36% | 36% | 38% | |
Conceded | 5 | 2 | 7 | 14 | |
Saved | 5/5 | 0/2 | 5/7 | 10 | |
Saved % | 100% | 0% | 71% | 171% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Sarasota Challenger
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Charlie RobertsonRobertson (7-61 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Mathys ErhardErhard (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Mark LajalLajal (6-3 6-76 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre (6-0 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Emilio NavaNava (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (1-1) – H2H and prediction