Andres Martin and Alfredo Perez will face off in the 2nd round of the Mexico City Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on GRANDSTAND. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alfredo Perez who should win in 3 sets.
Alfredo Perez -> 1.86
Andres Martin -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Andres Martin vs. Alfredo Perez
There is no head to head record between Andres Martin and Alfredo Perez since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Andres Martin
21 - 8win/loss
264
264
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-28 | 32-18 | 9-4 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 19-16 | 14-11 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-17 | 14-11 | 1-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-8 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 449, Martin reached the 2nd round after beating Cannon Kingsley 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3, Ryan Seggerman 6-3 4-6 6-3 and Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar 6-1 6-0.
In the 1st round, Martin had a good straight sets win against Carlos Manuel Aguilar (6-1 6-0). During the match, Martin scored 56 points vs Carlos Manuel Aguilar’s 29. The American was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Martin made 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Andres Martin was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (22/30) of his 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Martin broke Carlos Manuel Aguilar 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Martin has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 61% of his matches (76-48). 7-2 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Martin has an aggregate8-5 record in the last 4 years on clay.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Kingston and M25 Calabasas.
Andres has a composed 21-7 win-loss record in 2025, 7-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mexico City Challenger
Andres has never competed in this tournament before.
Alfredo Perez
24 - 5win/loss
332
315
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-28 | 31-18 | 7-3 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-9 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-25 | 18-16 | 0-0 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-22 | 22-11 | 9-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-12 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 500, Perez reached the 2nd round after beating Stefan Dostanic 6-4 6-2, Tom Paris 6-2 6-4 and Juan Pablo Ficovich 7-6(2) 6-4.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Pablo Ficovich (7-62 6-4). During the match Perez scored 87 points vs Pablo Ficovich’s 79. Perez was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Perez struck 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Alfredo Perez was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (37/50) of his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Alfredo broke Pablo Ficovich twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Perez’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Huamantla.
The American has a compiled 23-5 win-loss record in 2025, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martin | Perez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 70 | 59 |
| Pts | 257-203 | 219-186 |
| Total Points | 460 | 405 |
| Winners | 102 | 89 |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% |
Both Martin and Perez played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Andres Martin conceded 2 sets while Alfredo Perez hasn’t dropped a set so far. Martin has played 2 sets more than Perez (8 vs 6). Therefore, Martin played 11 games more than Perez. Andres scored 102 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Alfredo recorded 89 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martin | Perez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 2.3 | 4.7 |
| 1st in | 138/223 | 122/208 |
| %1st in | 62% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 102/138 | 89/122 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 50/85 | 49/86 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 57% |
Martin made 7 aces (2.3 per match). Perez recorded 14 aces (4.7 per match). Martin won 74% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Perez won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martin | Perez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 8 |
| Converted | 12/23 | 8/21 |
| % Converted | 52% | 38% |
| Conceded | 14 | 7 |
| Saved | 12 | 6 |
| % Saved | 86% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Martin broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Martin surrendered his serve twice and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. Alfredo broke his opponents 8 times with a 38% conversion rate. Alfredo conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Martin | |||||
| Q1 Kingsley | Q3 Seggerman | R1 Carlos Manuel Aguilar | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-73 6-3 | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 28 | 13 | 70 | |
| pts | 104-88 | 97-86 | 56-29 | 257-203 | |
| Total points | 192 | 183 | 85 | 460 | |
| Winners | 37 | 43 | 22 | 102 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 44% | 39% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 5 | 2 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 48/92 | 60/89 | 30/42 | 138/223 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 67% | 71% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 37/48 | 43/60 | 22/30 | 102/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 72% | 73% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/44 | 15/29 | 7/12 | 50/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 52% | 58% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/8 | 5/7 | 12/23 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 50% | 71% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 | 3 | 14 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 7/9 | 3/3 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 78% | 100% | 93% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Perez | |||||
| Q1 Dostanic | Q3 Paris | R1 Pablo Ficovich | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | 23 | 59 | |
| pts | 67-58 | 65-49 | 87-79 | 219-186 | |
| Total points | 125 | 114 | 166 | 405 | |
| Winners | 30 | 22 | 37 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 34% | 43% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 6 | 6 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 45/77 | 27/52 | 50/79 | 122/208 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 52% | 63% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 30/45 | 22/27 | 37/50 | 89/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 81% | 74% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 16/25 | 15/29 | 49/86 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 64% | 52% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/9 | 2/7 | 8/21 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 33% | 29% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 0/0 | 3/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 75% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Mexico City Challenger
- Juan Alejandro HernandezAlejandro Hernandez – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Tom ParisParis (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Maxime CressyCressy (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-1 4-6 7-67) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Aidan MayoMayo (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (7-65 7-66) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Rodrigo AlujasAlujas (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (3-6 6-3 7-69) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Mateus AlvesAlves (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Aidan MayoMayo (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (7-6(6) 6-1) – See score progression
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-1 4-6 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias SotoSoto – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Hernandez SerranoHernandez Serrano – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction